Skip to main content

Collective Perception of Environmental Features in a Robot Swarm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Swarm Intelligence (ANTS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9882))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In order to be effective, collective decision-making strategies need to be not only fast and accurate, but sufficiently general to be ported and reused across different problem domains. In this paper, we propose a novel problem scenario, collective perception, and use it to compare three different strategies: the DMMD, DMVD, and DC strategies. The robots are required to explore their environment, estimate the frequency of certain features, and collectively perceive which feature is the most frequent. We implemented the collective perception scenario in a swarm robotics system composed of 20 e-pucks and performed robot experiments with all considered strategies. Additionally, we also deepened our study by means of physics-based simulations. The results of our performance comparison in the collective perception scenario are in agreement with previous results for a different problem domain and support the generality of the considered strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The DMVD strategy was originally named the weighted voter model.

  2. 2.

    Refer to [14, 15] for a detailed description of the DMMD and DMVD strategies.

  3. 3.

    See http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/supp/IridiaSupp2016-002/ for videos of the experiments.

References

  1. Campo, A., Garnier, S., Dédriche, O., Zekkri, M., Dorigo, M.: Self-organized discrimination of resources. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19888 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorigo, M., et al.: Swarm robotics. Scholarpedia 9(1), 1463 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, S.C., Pratt, S.C.: Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. B 276(1673), 3655–3661 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutiérrez, M., et al.: Open e-puck range & bearing miniaturized board for local communication in swarm robotics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2009, pp. 3111–3116 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kernbach, S., et al.: Re-embodiment of honeybee aggregation behavior in an artificial micro-robotic system. Adapt. Behav. 17(3), 237–259 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kornienko, S., et al.: Cognitive micro-agents: individual and collective perception in microrobotic swarm. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2005 Workshop on Agents in Real-Time and Dynamic Environments, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 33–42 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mermoud, G., et al.: Aggregation-mediated collective perception and action in a group of miniature robots. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2010, pp. 599–606. IFAAMAS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mondada, F., et al.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, pp. 59–65. IPCB (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montes de Oca, M., et al.: Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making. Swarm Intell. 5, 305–327 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinciroli, C., et al.: ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems. Swarm Intell. 6(4), 271–295 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmickl, T., Möslinger, C., Crailsheim, K.: Collective perception in a robot swarm. In: Şahin, E., Spears, W.M., Winfield, A.F.T. (eds.) SAB 2006 Ws 2007. LNCS, vol. 4433, pp. 144–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Tarapore, D., et al.: Abnormality detection in multiagent systems inspired by the adaptive immune system. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2013, pp. 23–30. IFAAMAS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valentini, G., et al.: Efficient decision-making in a self-organizing robot swarm: on the speed versus accuracy trade-off. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp. 1305–1314. IFAAMAS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Collective decision with 100 Kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 30(3), 553–580 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valentini, G., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Self-organized collective decision making: the weighted voter model. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2014, pp. 45–52. IFAAMAS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank A. Reina, L. Garattoni, and A. Antoun for their assistance during the development of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gabriele Valentini or Marco Dorigo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Valentini, G., Brambilla, D., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M. (2016). Collective Perception of Environmental Features in a Robot Swarm. In: Dorigo, M., et al. Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44426-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44427-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics