Skip to main content

SMEDL: Combining Synchronous and Asynchronous Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Runtime Verification (RV 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10012))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Two major approaches have emerged in runtime verification, based on synchronous and asynchronous monitoring. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages and is applicable in different situations. In this paper, we explore a hybrid approach, where low-level properties are checked synchronously, while higher-level ones are checked asynchronously. We present a tool for constructing and deploying monitors based on an architecture specification. Monitor logic and patterns of communication between monitors are specified in a language SMEDL. The language and the tool are illustrated using a case study of a robotic simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://gitlab.precise.seas.upenn.edu/tengz/SMEDLTool.

References

  1. Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: A brief account of runtime verification. J. Logic Algebraic Program. 78(5), 293–303 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Francalanza, A.: A theory of monitors. In: Jacobs, B., Löding, C. (eds.) FOSSACS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9634, pp. 145–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49630-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Francalanza, A., Gauci, A., Pace, G.J.: Distributed system contract monitoring. J. Logic Algebraic Program. 82(5–7), 186–215 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, M., Kannan, S., Lee, I., Sokolsky, O., Viswanathan, M.: Java-MaC: a run-time assurance approach for Java programs. Formal Methods Syst. Des. 24(2), 129–155 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou, W., Sokolsky, O., Loo, B.T., Lee, I.: DMaC: distributed monitoring and checking. In: Bensalem, S., Peled, D.A. (eds.) RV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5779, pp. 184–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04694-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Meredith, P.O., Jin, D., Griffith, D., Chen, F., Roşu, G.: An overview of the MOP runtime verification framework. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 14(3), 249–289 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo, Q., Zhang, Y., Lee, C., Jin, D., Meredith, P.O.N., Şerbănuţă, T.F., Roşu, G.: RV-Monitor: efficient parametric runtime verification with simultaneous properties. In: Bonakdarpour, B., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) RV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8734, pp. 285–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J.-M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Akşit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). doi:10.1007/BFb0053381

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Z., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Xi, H., Yang, Z.: Parametric runtime verification of C programs. In: Chechik, M., Raskin, J.-F. (eds.) TACAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9636, pp. 299–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49674-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo, C., Pace, G.J., Abela, P.: Compensation-aware runtime monitoring. In: Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Finkbeiner, B., Havelund, K., Lee, I., Pace, G., Roşu, G., Sokolsky, O., Tillmann, N. (eds.) RV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6418, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sen, K., Vardhan, A., Agha, G., Rosu, G.: Efficient decentralized monitoring of safety in distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 418–427. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nazarpour, H., Falcone, Y., Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., Combaz, J.: Monitoring multi-threaded component-based systems. Technical report TR-2015-5, Verimag Research Report (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barringer, H., Rydeheard, D., Havelund, K.: Rule systems for run-time monitoring: from Eagle to RuleR. J. Logic Comput. 20(3), 675–706 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, T., Gebhard, P., Sokolsky, O.: Semantics of SMEDL monitor objects. Technical report MS-CIS-16-02, University of Pennsylvania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, T., Gebhard, P., Sokolsky, O.: Architecture description language for SMEDL. Technical report MS-CIS-16-06, University of Pennsylvania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Videla, A., Williams, J.J.: RabbitMQ in Action. Manning, Shelter Island (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teng Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, T., Gebhard, P., Sokolsky, O. (2016). SMEDL: Combining Synchronous and Asynchronous Monitoring. In: Falcone, Y., Sánchez, C. (eds) Runtime Verification. RV 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46982-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46982-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46982-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics