Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bio-Inspired Materials: Contribution of Biology to Energy Efficiency of Buildings

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ecomaterials

Abstract

This chapter systematically analyzes the existing literature on bio-inspired materials used in architecture, construction, and building design. Imitating nature accounts for an effective strategy for designing innovative buildings. Integrating this biomimicry strategy into the design process generates benefits for both designers and the natural environment, as bio-inspired designs can contribute to sustainability. Mimicking nature, various biomimetic approaches have produced environmentally friendly, innovative, smart, or intelligent materials for buildings. This literature review demonstrates that researchers and designers are significantly inspired by animals’, plants’, or microorganisms’ innovative biological systems (functions, structures, and processes) in order to design bio-inspired materials for increasing energy efficiency of the buildings. However, the range of innovative bio-inspired materials is not broad, and most of the published research seems to be about one-off cases. The chapter first introduces the systematic literature research methodology used for analyzing the current knowledge of architectural bio-inspired materials. Current research on bio-inspired materials used in architectural and building science is reviewed, and a new classification scheme for clustering relevant data is presented. These innovative materials serve different functions in buildings. This classification scheme enables a new synthesis of existing knowledge based on the multi-functionality of currently developed bio-inspired building. The chapter concludes by substantiating the argument that “there is no systematic and general workflow for data mining innovative building design/construction concepts from biological processes.” Overall, then, this research suggests that there is a need for a bio-architectural workflow assisting scientists and designers to find the relevant organisms in nature as the source of inspiration for innovative design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wahl DC (2006) Bionics vs. biomimicry: from control of nature to sustainable participation in nature. Paper presented at the Design and nature III: comparing design in nature with science and engineering, Vol 8. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  2. Papanek V (1974) Design for the real world: human ecology and social change. Paladin, St Albans

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel S (1998) Cats’ paws and catapults: mechanical worlds of nature and people/Steven Vogel illustrated by Kathryn K. Davis with the author, 1st edn. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pele M, Cimpeanu C (2012) Biotechnology: an introduction. WIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benyus JM (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature, 1st edn. Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Badarnah Kadri L (2012) Towards the LIVING envelope: biomimetics for building envelope adaptation. In: Architectural engineering + technology. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology. Zutphen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gamage A, Hyde R (2012) A model based on biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design. Archit Sci Rev 55(3):224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazzoleni I (2013) In: Price S (ed) Architecture follows nature: biomimetic principles for innovative design/Ilaria Mazzoleni in collaboration with Shauna Price. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlyn M (2011) Biomimicry in architecture. Riba Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zari MP (2010) Biomimetic design for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Archit Sci Rev 53(2):172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peters S (2011) In: ProQuest (ed) Material revolution: sustainable multi-purpose materials for design and architecture. Springer, Basel/London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abderrazak El A et al (2010) Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago. Nature 466(7302):100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber P et al (2011) Biomimetics: materials, structures and processes: examples, ideas and case studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans J, Benefield P (2001) Systematic reviews of educational research: does the medical model fit? British Educational Research Journal 27(5):527–541

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blessinger K, Olle M (2004) Content analysis of the leading general academic databases. Libr Collect Acquis Tech Serv 28(3):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lombard M, Jones MT (2007) Identifying the (tele)presence literature. Psychnol J 5(2):197–206

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chadegani A et al (2013) A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Soc Sci 9(5):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD, Ayvazyan L (2013) Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases. J Korean Med Sci 28(9):1270–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X (2010) Google Scholar’s dramatic coverage improvement five years after debut 1 1 The author is grateful to Alice Chen of Duke University for editing this paper. Ser Rev 36(4):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walters WH (2007) Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field. Inf Process Manag 43(4):1121–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Imhof B, Gruber PE (2015) Built to grow – blending architecture and biology. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gorb SN, Gorb EV (2016) Insect-inspired architecture: insects and other arthropods as a source for creative design in architecture. In: Knippers J, Nickel KG, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 57–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Oxman N (2010) Structuring materiality: design fabrication of heterogeneous materials. Archit Des 80(4):78–85

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oxman N (2011) Variable property rapid prototyping: inspired by nature, where form is characterized by heterogeneous compositions. Virtual Phys Prototyping 6(1):3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xing Y et al (2017) Exploring design principles of biological and living building envelopes: what can we learn from plant cell walls? Intell Build Int, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2017.1394808

  26. Memmott P, Hyde R, O’Rourke T (2009) Biomimetic theory and building technology: use of Aboriginal and scientific knowledge of spinifex grass. Archit Sci Rev 52(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oxman N et al (2013) Biological Computation for Digital Design and Fabrication. Paper presented at the Computation & Performance: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  28. Altun DA, Örgülü B (2014) Towards a different architecture in cooperation with nanotechnology and genetic science: new approaches for the present and the future. Archit Res 4(1B):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hu M (2016) Performance driven structural design biomimicry in architecture. In: 105th ACSA annual meeting, at Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  30. Amziane S, Collet F (2017) Bio-aggregates based building materials: state-of-the-art report of the RILEM Technical Committee 236-BBM. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Montana-Hoyos C, Fiorentino C (2016) Bio-utilization, bio-inspiration, and bio-affiliation in design for sustainability: biotechnology, biomimicry, and biophilic design. Int J Design Object 10(3):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mekonnen T et al (2013) Progress in bio-based plastics and plasticizing modifications. J Mater Chem 1(43):13379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Boussetoua H et al (2017) Mechanical and hygrothermal characterisation of cork concrete composite: experimental and modelling study. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 1:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asha AB, Sharif A, Hoque ME (2017) Interface interaction of jute fiber reinforced PLA biocomposites for potential applications. In: Green biocomposites. Springer, Cham, pp 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aït Oumeziane Y et al (2017) Influence of hysteresis on the transient hygrothermal response of a hemp concrete wall. J Build Perform Simul 10(3):256–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vukusic P, Sambles JR (2003) Photonic structures in biology. Nature 424(6950):852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Klang K et al (2017) Plants and animals as source of inspiration for energy dissipation in load bearing systems and facades. In: Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction, biologically-inspired systems. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lienhard J et al (2011) Flectofin: a hingeless flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinspir Biomim 6(4):045001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lienhard J et al (2009) Abstraction of plant movements for deployable structures in architecture. Paper presented at the In Proc. of the 6th Plant Biomechanics Conf. Cayenne, French Guyana, Franc

    Google Scholar 

  40. Poppinga S et al (2010) Plant movements as concept generators for deployable systems in architecture. In: A Carpi, CA Brebbia (Eds.) Design and Nature V. Wit Press, pp 403–409

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ota T, Enoki S (2010) Material design of a biomimetic composite material used for a wooden building joint structure. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 138:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kolednik O et al (2011) Bioinspired design criteria for damage-resistant materials with periodically varying microstructure. Adv Funct Mater 21(19):3634–3641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Trask RS, Bond IP (2010) Bioinspired engineering study of Plantae vascules for self-healing composite structures. J R Soc Interface 7(47):921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Honey KT, Pagani GA (2013) Bio inspired energy: biomimicry innovations for energy sustainability. In: Complex systems summer school proceedings. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tao P et al (2015) Bioinspired engineering of thermal materials. Adv Mater 27(3):428–463

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang W et al (2009) Novel photoanode structure templated from butterfly wing scales. Chem Mater 21(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang C, McAdams DA, Grunlan JC (2016) Nano/micro-manufacturing of bioinspired materials: a review of methods to mimic natural structures. Adv Mater 28(30):6292–6321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu X et al (2010) Replication of butterfly wing in TiO2 with ordered mesopores assembled inside for light harvesting. Mater Lett 64(24):2745–2747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen J et al (2012) Bioinspired Au/TiO2 photocatalyst derived from butterfly wing (Papilio Paris). J Colloid Interface Sci 370(1):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou H, Fan T, Zhang D (2011) Biotemplated Materials for Sustainable Energy and Environment: Current Status and Challenges. ChemSusChem, 4(10):1344–1387 

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stegmaier T, Linke M, Planck H (2009) Bionics in textiles: flexible and translucent thermal insulations for solar thermal applications. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 367(1894):1749–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jia H et al (2017) Design and optimization of a photo-thermal energy conversion model based on polar bear hair. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 159:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang T et al (2013) Synthesis and thermal conductivities of the biomorphic Al2O3 fibers derived from silk template. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 10(2):285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vanaga R, Blumberga A (2015) First steps to develop biomimicry ideas. Energy Procedia 72:307–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Han ZW et al (2016) Antireflective surface inspired from biology: a review. Biosurf Biotribol 2(4):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Han Y, Taylor JE, Pisello AL (2015) Toward mitigating urban heat island effects: investigating the thermal-energy impact of bio-inspired retro-reflective building envelopes in dense urban settings. Energy Build 102:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Alston M (2015) Natures buildings as trees: biologically inspired glass as an energy system. Opt Photon J 5(136):136–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shaikh PH et al (2014) A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Reyssat E, Mahadevan L (2009) Hygromorphs: from pine cones to biomimetic bilayers. J R Soc Interface 6(39):951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Randall ME et al (2013) Self-shaping composites with programmable bioinspired microstructures. Nat Commun 4:1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Holstov A, Bridgens B, Farmer G (2015) Hygromorphic materials for sustainable responsive architecture. Constr Build Mater 98:570–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jayaguru C (2016) Health monitoring of concrete specimens using smart aggregates. i-Manag J Struct Eng 5(3):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lim YY, Soh CK (2014) Electro-mechanical impedance (EMI)-based incipient crack monitoring and critical crack identification of beam structures. Res Nondestruct Eval 25(2):82–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Loh K J, Ryu D, Lee B M (2015) Bio-inspired sensors for structural health monitoring. In: F Pacheco Torgal et al (eds) Biotechnologies and Biomimetics for Civil Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 255–274

    Google Scholar 

  65. Knippers J, Nickel KG, Speck T (2016) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures, vol 8. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  66. Eurich L, Schott R, Wagner A, Roth-Nebelsick A (2016) Fundamentals of heat and mass transport in frost-resistant plant tissues. In: Knippers J, Nickel KG, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  67. Betz O et al (2016) Adaptive stiffness and joint-free kinematics: actively actuated rod-shaped structures in plants and animals and their biomimetic potential in architecture and engineering. In: Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction. Springer, Cham, pp 135–167

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chen S-Y, Chiu M-L (2007) Designing smart skins for adaptive environments: a fuzzy logic approach to smart house design. Comput Aided Des Appl 4(6):751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Maragkoudaki A (2013) No-Mech Kinetic Responsive Architecture: Kinetic Responsive Architecture with No Mechanical Parts. 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE). IEEE, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  70. Le Duigou A et al (2017) Natural fibres actuators for smart bio-inspired hygromorph biocomposites. Smart Mater Struct 26(12):125009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Reichert S, Menges A, Correa D (2015) Meteorosensitive architecture: biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. Comput Aided Des 60:50–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Berardi U (2010) Dielectric electroactive polymer applications in buildings. Intell Build Int 2(3):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sung D (2016) Smart geometries for smart materials: taming thermobimetals to behave. J Archit Educ 70(1):96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Lopez M et al (2015) Active materials for adaptive architectural envelopes based on plant adaptation principles. J Facade Des Eng 3:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gebeshuber I et al (2010) Bacilli, green algae, diatoms and red blood cells-how nanobiotechnological research inspires architecture Bio-Inspired Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology. Nova Science Publishers, pp 207–244  

    Google Scholar 

  76. Nessim MA (2015) Biomimetic architecture as a new approach for energy efficient buildings through smart building materials. J Green Build 10(4):73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gil-Lopez T, Gimenez-Molina C (2013) Influence of double glazing with a circulating water chamber on the thermal energy savings in buildings. Energy Build 56:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Carbonari A et al (2012) Experimental estimation of the solar properties of a switchable liquid shading system for glazed facades. Energy & Buildings 45(299–310)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Xu YL, He J (2017) Smart civil structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  80. Carolyn D (1994) Matrix cracking repair and filling using active and passive modes for smart timed release of chemicals from fibers into cement matrices. Smart Mater Struct 3(2):118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang Y (2003) The concept and development of smart structures technologies for long-span cable-supported bridges. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 21(3–4):315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Seifan M, Samani A, Berenjian A (2016) Bioconcrete: next generation of self-healing concrete. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(6):2591–2602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kumar VR et al (2011) An overview of techniques based on biomimetics for sustainable development of concrete. Curr Sci 101(6):741–747

    Google Scholar 

  84. Han B, Zhang L, Ou J (2017) Future developments and challenges of smart and multifunctional concrete. In: Smart and multifunctional concrete toward sustainable infrastructures. Springer, Singapore, pp 391–400

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  85. Nosonovsky M, Rohatgi PK (2011) Thermodynamic principles of self-healing metallic materials. In: Biomimetics in materials science. Springer, New York, pp 25–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  86. Seo J, Kyoung-Hwan K (2017) Analytical investigation of the cyclic behavior of smart recentering T-stub components with superelastic SMA bolts. Metals 7(10):386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Braconi A, Morelli F, Salvatore W (2012) Development, design and experimental validation of a steel self-centering device (SSCD) for seismic protection of buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 10(6):1915–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Kaluvan S, Park C-Y, Choi S-B (2016) Bio-inspired device: a novel smart MR spring featuring tendril structure. Smart Mater Struct 25(1):01LT01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ripley R L, Bhushan B (2016) Bioarchitecture: bioinspired art and architecture–a perspective. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 374(2073):20160192

    Google Scholar 

  90. Hensel M (2006) (Synthetic) life architectures: ramifications and potentials of a literal biological paradigm for architectural design. Archit Des 76(2):18–25

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  91. Armstrong R (2014) Designing with protocells: applications of a novel technical platform. Life 4(3):457–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Goreau TJ (2012) Marine electrolysis for building materials and environmental restoration. In: Electrolysis. INTECH, Rijeka, Croatia

    Google Scholar 

  93. Deplazes A, Huppenbauer M (2009) Synthetic organisms and living machines. Syst Synth Biol 3(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Reap J, Baumeister D, Bras B (2005) Holism, biomimicry and sustainable engineering. In ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 423–431

    Google Scholar 

  95. Martín-Palma R J, Lakhtakia A (2013) Engineered biomimicry for harvesting solar energy: a bird's eye view. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials, 4(2):83–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture and Design, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Marzieh Imani, Michael Donn & Zahra Balador

Authors
  1. Marzieh Imani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Donn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Balador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzieh Imani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Instituto de Ingeniería Civil, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico

    Leticia Myriam Torres Martínez

  2. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León , Monterrey, Mexico

    Oxana Vasilievna Kharissova

  3. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León , Monterrey, Mexico

    Boris Ildusovich Kharisov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Imani, M., Donn, M., Balador, Z. (2018). Bio-Inspired Materials: Contribution of Biology to Energy Efficiency of Buildings. In: Martínez, L., Kharissova, O., Kharisov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ecomaterials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_136-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_136-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48281-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48281-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation