Abstract
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a family of statistical techniques that has become very popular in marketing. Its ability to model latent variables, to take various forms of measurement error into account, and to test entire theories makes it useful for a plethora of research questions. It does not come as a surprise that some of the most cited scholarly articles in the marketing domain are about SEM (e.g., Bagozzi and Yi 1988; Fornell and Larcker 1981), and that SEM is covered by two contributions within this volume. The need for two contributions arises from the SEM family tree having two major branches (Reinartz et al. 2009): covariance-based SEM (which is presented in Chap. 11) and variance-based SEM, which is presented in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This assumption should be relaxed in the case of non-recursive models (Dijkstra and Henseler 2015a).
- 2.
For an application of the NFI, see Ziggers and Henseler (2016).
- 3.
Interestingly, the methodological literature on factor models hardly mentions what to do if the test rejects a factor model. Some researchers suggest considering a composite model as an alternative, because it is less restrictive (Henseler et al. 2014) and not subject to factor indeterminacy (Rigdon 2012). Others suggest allowing small deviations without principally questioning the factor model (see Asparouhov et al. 2015).
- 4.
The AVE must be calculated based on consistent loadings, otherwise the assessment of convergent and discriminant validity based on the AVE is meaningless.
References
Albers, S.: PLS and success factor studies in marketing. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 409–425. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., Lalive, R.: On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadership Quart. 21, 1086–1120 (2010)
Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., Morin, A.J.S.: Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: comments on Stromeyer et al. J. Manag. 41, 1561–1577 (2015)
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16, 74–94 (1988)
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., Singh, S.: On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs: two extensions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 8, 125–140 (1991)
Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Rigdon, E.E.: Predictive validity and formative measurement in structural equation modeling: embracing practical relevance. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy (2013)
Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588–606 (1980)
Bentler, P.M., Huang, W.: On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: reactions to Rigdon’s rethinking of PLS. Long Range Plan. 47, 138–145 (2014)
Bollen, K.A., Diamantopoulos, A.: In defense of causal–formative indicators: a minority report. Psychol. Methods. (2017). In print
Bollen, K.A., Stine, R.A.: Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 21, 205–229 (1992)
Buckler, F., Hennig-Thurau, T.: Identifying hidden structures in marketing’s structural models through universal structure modeling. An explorative Bayesian neural network complement to LISREL and PLS. Mark. J. Res. Manag. 4, 47–66 (2008)
Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Psychology Press, Hove (2013)
Chin, W.W.: Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 83–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Chin, W.W., Frye, T.A.: PLS graph-version 3.0: Soft Modeling Inc. (2003)
Coelho, P.S., Henseler, J.: Creating customer loyalty through service customization. Eur. J. Mark. 46, 331–356 (2012)
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1988)
Cohen, J.: The earth is round (p<.05). Am. Psychol. 49, 997–1003 (1994)
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., Kaiser, S.: Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 434–449 (2012)
Dijkstra, T.K.: Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold’s basic design and partial least squares. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 23–46. Heidelberg, Springer (2010)
Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites. Qual. Quant. 45, 1505–1518 (2011)
Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Assessing and testing the goodness-of-fit of PLS path models. Paper presented at the 3rd VOC Conference, Leiden (2014)
Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 81, 10–23 (2015a)
Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quart. 39, 297–316 (2015b)
Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., Amato, S.: PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 23–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Fornell, C.: A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. J. Mark. 56(1), 6–21 (1992)
Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J., Bryant, B.E.: The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. J. Mark. 60(4), 7–18 (1996)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., Ringle, C.M.: The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Plan. 45, 320–340 (2012a)
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Mena, J.A.: An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 414–433 (2012b)
Hennig-Thurau, T., Groth, M., Paul, M., Gremler, D.D.: Are all smiles created equal? How emotional contagion and emotional labor affect service relationships. J. Mark. 70(3), 58–73 (2006)
Henseler, J.: On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Comput. Stat. 25, 107–120 (2010)
Henseler, J.: PLS-MGA: a non-parametric approach to partial least squares-based multi-group analysis. In: Gaul, W.A., Geyer-Schulz, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Kunze, J. (eds.) Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, and Optimization (Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization), pp. 495–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2012a)
Henseler, J.: Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 402–413 (2012b)
Henseler, J.: Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? On the interplay of marketing and design research. Inaugural lecture, University of Twente (2015)
Henseler, J.: Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modelling. J. Adv. 46(1), 178–192 (2017)
Henseler, J., Chin, W.W.: A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. 17, 82–109 (2010)
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K.: ADANCO 2.0. Composite Modeling, Kleve (2015)
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., et al.: Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods. 17, 182–209 (2014)
Henseler, J., Fassott, G.: Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 713–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Henseler, J., Fassott, G., Dijkstra, T.K., Wilson, B.: Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 99–112 (2012a)
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., Ray, P.A.: Using PLS path modeling in new tech-nology research: updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 2–20 (2016)
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: basic concepts and recent issues. In: Okazaki, S. (ed.) Handbook of Research in International Advertising, pp. 252–276. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2012b)
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2015)
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N. (eds.) Advances in International Marketing, vol. 20, pp. 277–320. Emerald, Bingley (2009)
Henseler, J., Sarstedt, M.: Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput. Stat. 28, 565–580 (2013)
Höök, K., Löwgren, J.: Strong concepts: intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 23 (2012)
Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.M.: Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods. 3(4), 424–453 (1998)
Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6, 1–55 (1999)
Hulland, J.: Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, 195–204 (1999)
Hwang, H., Takane, Y.: Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika. 69, 81–99 (2004)
Jean, R.-J., Sinhovies, R.R., Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. Int. Mark. Rev. 33, 405–431 (2016)
Johnson, M.D., Herrmann, A., Huber, F.: The evolution of loyalty intentions. J. Mark. 70(2), 122–132 (2006)
Kaufmann, L., Gaeckler, J.: A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 21, 259–272 (2015)
Kettenring, J.R.: Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika. 58, 433 (1971)
Krijnen, W.P., Dijkstra, T.K., Gill, R.D.: Conditions for factor (in)determinacy in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 63, 359–367 (1998)
Lohmöller, J.-B.: The PLS program system: latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 23, 125–127 (1988)
Lohmöller, J.-B.: Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica, Heidelberg (1989)
McDonald, R.P.: Path analysis with composite variables. Multivar. Behav. Res. 31, 239–270 (1996)
McDonald, R.P.: Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1999)
Nitzl, C., Roldán, J.L., Cepeda, G.: Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 1849–1864 (2016)
Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)
Peng, D.X., Lai, F.: Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J. Oper. Manag. 30, 467–480 (2012)
Rego, L.L.: The relationship market structure-market efficiency from a customer satisfaction perspective. Adv. Consum. Res. 25, 132–138 (1998)
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., Henseler, J.: An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int. J. Res. Mark. 26, 332–344 (2009)
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P.E., Savalei, V.: When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol. Methods. 17, 354–373 (2012)
Rigdon, E.E.: Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simple methods. Long Range Plan. 45, 341–358 (2012)
Rigdon, E.E.: Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: breaking chains and forging ahead. Long Range Plan. 47, 161–167 (2014)
Rigdon, E.E., Becker, J.-M., Rai, A., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Dijkstra, T.K.: Conflating antecedents and formative indicators: a comment on Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas. Inf. Syst. Res. 25, 780–784 (2014)
Rindskopf, D.: Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika. 49, 37–47 (1984)
Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: the importance-performance map analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 11, 1865–1886 (2016)
Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Straub, D.W.: Editor’s comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quart. 36, 3–14 (2012)
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS, Bönningstedt (2015). http://www.smartpls.com
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A.: SmartPLS 2.0 (2005) www.smartpls.de
Roemer, E.: A tutorial on the use of PLS path modeling in longitudinal studies. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 1901–1921 (2016)
Sahmer, K., Hanafi, M., Qannari, M.: Assessing unidimensionality within the PLS path modeling framework. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C., Nürnberger, A., Gaul, W. (eds.) From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering, pp. 222–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M.: Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv. Int. Mark. 22, 195–218. Emerald, Bingley (2011)
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Henseler, J., Hair, J.F.: On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: a commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Plan. 47, 154–160 (2014)
Sijtsma, K.: On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 74, 107–120 (2009)
Smith, J.B., Barclay, D.W.: The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. J. Mark. 61(1), 3–21 (1997)
Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S.: PLS FAC-SEM: an illustrated step-by-step guideline to obtain a unique insight in factorial data. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116 (2016)
Streukens, S., Wetzels, M., Daryanto, A., De Ruyter, K.: Analyzing factorial data using PLS: application in an online complaining context. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 567–587. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Tenenhaus, M.: Component-based structural equation modelling. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 19, 871–886 (2008)
Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., Esposito Vinzi, V.: A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. In proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting. 1, 739–742 (2004)
Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y.-M., Lauro, C.: PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48, 159–205 (2005)
Tenenhaus, A., Tenenhaus, M.: Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika. 76, 257–284 (2011)
Turkyilmaz, A., Oztekin, A., Zaim, S., Fahrettin Demirel, O.: Universal structure modeling approach to customer satisfaction index. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 113, 932–949 (2013)
Ulaga, W., Eggert, A.: Value-based differentiation in business relationships: gaining and sustaining key supplier status. J. Mark. 70(1), 119–136 (2006)
Voorhees, C.M., Brady, M.K., Calantone, R., Ramirez, E.: Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44, 119–134 (2016)
Wold, H.O.A.: Causal flows with latent variables: partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modelling. Eur. Econ. Rev. 5, 67–86 (1974)
Wold, H.O.A.: Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In: Jöreskog, K.G., Wold, H.O.A. (eds.) Systems Under Indirect Observation, vol. 2, pp. 1–54. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)
Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., Chen, Q.: Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37, 197–206 (2010)
Ziggers, G.-W., Henseler, J.: The reinforcing effect of a firm’s customer orientation and supply-base orientation on performance. Ind. Mark. Manag. 52, 18–26 (2016)
Acknowledgments
Major parts of this paper are taken from Henseler et al. (2016). The author acknowledges a financial interest in ADANCO and its distributor, Composite Modeling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henseler, J. (2017). Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. In: Leeflang, P., Wieringa, J., Bijmolt, T., Pauwels, K. (eds) Advanced Methods for Modeling Markets. International Series in Quantitative Marketing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53469-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53469-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53467-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53469-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)