Skip to main content

The Immortal Life of Ethics? The Alienation of Body Tissue, Ethics and the Informed Consent Procedure Within Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioethics Beyond Altruism

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the creation, in 2007, of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as an ethical alternative to human embryonic stem cells . In so doing, we raise a series of questions around the social, ethical and legal issues associated with iPSC. Drawing on empirical research, we explore results from an in-depth study into participant motivations for donating tissue for the generation of patient-specific iPSCs, and discuss participant attitudes and understanding of ethical issues surrounding iPSC research. We suggest that current ethical and informed consent practices and guidelines are not adequate for emerging biotechnologies, such as iPSCs, and argue that new methods of communicating informed consent to research participants are required.

When people ask – I say, Yeah, that’s right, my mother [’s] name was Henrietta Lacks, she died in 1951, Johns Hopkins took her cells and them cells are still living today, still multiplying, still growin and spreadin if you don’t keep em frozen. Science calls her HeLa… But I always thought it was strange, if our mother cells done so much for medicine, how come her family can’t afford to see no doctors? Don’t make no sense. People got rich off my mother without us even knowin about them taking her cells, now we don’t get a dime.

Deborah, daughter of Henrietta Lacks (Skloot 2010: 9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalto-Setälä, K., Conklin, B. R., & Lo, B. (2009). Obtaining consent for future research with induced pluripotent cells: Opportunities and challenges. PLoS Biology, 7(2), e42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollschweiler, E., Apitzsch, J., Obliers, R., Koerfer, A., Mönig, S. P., Metzger, R., et al. (2008). Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery, 248(2), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccini, L. (2009). Developing an instrument to measure informed consent comprehension in non-cognitively impaired adults, Unpublished Doctor of Public Health thesis, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski, D. (2008). Stem cells: 5 things to know before jumping on the iPS bandwagon. Nature News, 452(7186), 406–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley, G. Q., Hyun, I., Apperley, J. F., Barker, R. A., Benvenisty, N., Bredenoord, A. L., … & Heslop, H. E. (2016). Setting global standards for stem cell research and clinical translation: The 2016 ISSCR guidelines. Stem Cell Reports, 6(6), 787–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, I., Bollinger, J., Mathews, D. J., Neumann, N. M., Rattani, A., & Sugarman, J. (2014). Patients’ attitudes toward the donation of biological materials for the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 14, 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S., Lilford, R., & Hewison, J. (1998). The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. British Medical Journal, 317(7167), 1209–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, H. (2011). Unit 731. North Clarendon: Tuttle Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gymrek, M., McGuire, A. L., Golan, D., Halperin, E., & Erlich, Y. (2013). Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science, 339(6117), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, A. (2010). Indian tribe wins fight to limit research of its DNA. New York Times. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/us/22dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

  • Hoffner, B., Bauer-Wu, S., Hitchcock-Bryan, S., Powell, M., Wolanski, A., & Joffe, S. (2012). Entering a clinical trial: Is it right for you? A randomized study of the clinical trials video and its impact on the informed consent process. Cancer, 118(7), 1877–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S., Lebacqz, K., & Zoloth, L. (2001). The Human embryonic stem cell debate: Science, ethics, and public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpin, I. A. (2006). The uncanny embryos: Legal limits to the human and reproduction without women. Sydney Law Review, 28(4), 599–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., Capps, B. J., Sum, M. Y., Kuswanto, C. N., & Sim, K. (2014). Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: A systematic review. Clincial Genetics, 86, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. (2014). Disease modeling and cell based therapy with iPSC: Future therapeutic option with fast and safe application. Blood Research, 49(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, H. (2007). Culturing life: How cells becomes technologies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D. J., Rice, P., & Cuschieri, A. (1993). Factors affecting quality of informed consent. British Medical Journal, 306, 885–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. X., Nah, S. A., & Low, Y. (2014). Informed consent for emergency surgery-how much do parents truly remember? Journal of Pedartic Surgery, 49(5), 795–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, G. P., Hull, S. C., & Isasi, R. (2015). The DISCUSS project: Revised points to consider for the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from previously collected research specimens. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 4(2), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, G. P., Hull, S. C., Lowenthal, J., Rao, M., & Isasi, R. (2013). The DISCUSS project: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines from previously collected research biospecimens and informed consent: Points to consider. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 2(10), 727–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, J., Lipnick, S., Rao, M., & Hull, S. C. (2012). Specimen collection for induced pluripotent stem cell research: Harmonizing the approach to informed consent. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 1(5), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2008). Medical progress depends on animal models-doesn’t it? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(2), 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascalzoni, D., Dove, E. S., Rubinstein, Y., Dawkins, H. J., Kole, A., McCormack, P., … & Knoppers, B. M. (2015). International charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(6), 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, T., Liang, H., Chen, C., Fenwick, E., Rees, G., Wong, R., et al. (2016a). An Interactive multimedia approach to improving informed consent for induced pluripotent stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell, 18(3), 307–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, T., Chen, C., De Smit, E., Fenwick, E., Kearns, L., Mackey, D., et al. (2016b). Participant understanding and recall of improving informed consent for induced pluripotent stem cell biobanking. Cell and Tissue Banking. doi:10.1007/s10561-016-9563-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, F. J., Goldmann, J., Loser, P., & Loring, J. F. (2010). A call to standardize teratoma assays used to define human pluripotent cell lines. Cell Stem Cell, 6(5), 412–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. B. (2002). Japanese doctors’ experimentation in wartime China. The Lancet, 360, s5–s6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbotham, M. C., Astin, J., Greene, K., & Cummings, S. R. (2013). Interactive informed consent: Randomized comparison with paper consents. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. E., Prictor, M. J., McLaughlin, K. J. and Hill, S. J. (2008). Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 1(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003717.

  • Savage, R. (2001). Animal research: The need for a middle ground. British Medical Journal, 322(7281), 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidelman, W. (1988). Mengele medicus: Medicine’s nazi heritage. Milbank Quarterly, 66(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepucha, K. R., Fagerlin, A., Couper, M. P., Levin, C. A., Singer, E., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2010). How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey. Medical Decision Making, 30, 77S–84S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, A. N., Daly, M. K., & Legutko, P. (2012). Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 38(1), 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si-Tayeb, K., Noto, F. K., Sepac, A., Sedlic, F., Bosnjak, Z. J., Lough, J. W., et al. (2010). Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by simple transient transfection of plasmid DNA encoding reprogramming factors. BMC Developmental Biology, 10(1), 1. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-10-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J. M. (2010). A brief review of the Belmont report. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 29(4), 173–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skloot, R. (2010). The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Sydney: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonne, S. C., Andrews, J. O., Gentilin, S. M., Oppenheimer, S., Obeid, J., Brady, K., … and Magruder, K. (2013). Development and pilot testing of a video-assisted informed consent process. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 36(1), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J. (2008). Human stem cell ethics: Beyond the embryo. Cell Stem Cell, 2(6), 529–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synnot, A., Ryan, R., Prictor, M., Fetherstonhaugh, D., & Parker, B. (2014). Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD003717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Moscucci, M., Brennan-Martinez, C. M., & Levine, R. (2009). Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: A comparison with standard information. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(20), 1907–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., et al. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5), 861–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, N. T., Huy, N. T., Thoa le, T. B., Long, N. P., Trang, N. T., Hirayama, K. (2015). Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93, 186H–198H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Scott, C., Caulfield, T., Borgelt, E., & Illes, J. (2012). Erratum: Personal medicine-the new banking crisis. Nature Biotechnology, 30(5), 466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S., Waknitz, M., Swiergiel, J., Marshall, V., et al. (2008). Embryonic stem cell line derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282, 1145–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutton, R. (2014). Genomics and the reimagining of personalized medicine. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C., & Mitchell, R. (2006). Tissue economies: Blood organs and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, D. (2006). One-time general consent for research on biological samples. British Medical Journal, 332(7540), 544–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., … & Slukvin, I. I. (2007). Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 318(5858), 1917–1920.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Grant (1059369), the Bright Focus Foundation, Retina Australia, the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia and the Clifford Craig Medical Research Trust . Alex Hewitt is also funded by a NHMRC Fellowship. Alice Pébay is supported by an Australia Research Council Future Fellowship. This study was led by Alex Hewitt and Alice Pébay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casimir MacGregor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacGregor, C., McCaughey, T., Munsie, M., Pébay, A., Hewitt, A. (2017). The Immortal Life of Ethics? The Alienation of Body Tissue, Ethics and the Informed Consent Procedure Within Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Bioethics Beyond Altruism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55532-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55531-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55532-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics