Abstract
Place is a core component of human spatial knowledge and therefore a central topic in GI Science. People use externalizations of mental spatial representations to communicate about space. Textual descriptions and graphical descriptions are the two main modes of communication. In this paper a distinction of three scales of spatial descriptions is assumed and textual and graphical descriptions are collected and analyzed in order to investigate the differences between the spatial descriptions. Thereby the focus lies on the properties and perspectives of the descriptions. It is found that within the textual descriptions people tend to not consistently use one perspective, but switch perspectives and predominantly apply the route perspective. For the graphical descriptions there has been no clear categorization of description perspectives. However, there are differences in the properties of these descriptions that indicate different perspectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Taylor and Tversky distinguish three frames of reference: (1) relative, where the origin of the coordinate system is one of the participants, the speaker or the addressee, (2) intrinsic, where the origin of the coordinate system is a specific object, and (3) extrinsic, where the origin of the coordinate system is external to the scene.
- 2.
The two different terms of reference are (1) LRFBÂ =Â left, right, front, back, and (2) NSWEÂ =Â north, south, west, east.
- 3.
A branch is defined here as an alternative path through the region. A description with two branches thereby consists of two integrated route descriptions.
- 4.
A circuit is defined here as a route description through a region with the destination equals the origin.
References
Anacta VJ, Schwering A, Li R (2014) Determining hierarchy of landmarks in spatial descriptions. In: Eighth international conference on geographic information science, Vienna, Austria
Bryant DJ, Tversky B (1999) Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(1):137–156
Buhler K (1982) The deictic field of language and deictic words. In: Jarvella RJ, Klein W (eds) Speech, place, and action. Wiley, New York, pp 9–30
Carlson-Radvansky LA, Irwin DE (1994) Reference frame activation during spatial term assignment. J Mem Lang 33(5):646–671
Ehrich V, Koster C (1983) Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Process 6(2):169–195
Emmorey K, Tversky B, Taylor HA (2000) Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spat Cogn Comput 2(3):157–180
Freundschuh SM, Egenhofer MJ (1997) Human conceptions of spaces: implications for geographic information systems. Trans GIS 2(4):361–375
Galea LAM, Kimura D (1993) Sex differences in route-learning. Pers Individ Differ 14(1):53–65
Hund AM, Schmettow M, Noordzij ML (2012) The impact of culture and recipient perspective on direction giving in the service of wayfinding. J Environ Psychol 32(4):327–336
Kato Y, Takeuchi Y (2003) Individual differences in wayfinding strategies. J Environ Psychol 23(2):171–188
Lawton CA (1996) Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. J Environ Psychol 16(2):137–145
Lawton CA, Kallai J (2002) Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: a cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles 47(9):389–401
Levelt WJM (1982) Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms. In: Jarvella RJ, Klein W (eds) Speech, place, and action. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, pp 251–268
Levelt WJM (1984) Some perceptual limitations on talking about space. In: van Doorn AJ, van de Grind WA, Koenderink JJ (eds) Limits in perception. VNU Science Press, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp 323–358
Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Levinson SC (1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom P et al (eds) Language and space. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 109–156
Montello DR (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Proceedings COSIT ’93. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 312–321
Münzer S, Hölscher C (2011) Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zu räumlichen Strategien. Diagnostica 57(3):111–125
Pazzaglia F, Beni R De (2001) Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. Eur J Cogn Psychol 13(4):493–508
Richter K-F, Winter S (2014) Landmarks: GIScience for intelligent services. Springer
Schwering A, Li R, Anacta VJ (2013) Orientation information in different forms of route instructions. In: Proceedings of the 16th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Leuven, Belgium
Shanon B (1979) Where questions. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, La Jolla, California, pp 73–75
Sholl MJ et al (2000) The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment. J Environ Psychol 20(1):17–28
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992a) Descriptions and depictions of environments. Mem Cogn 20(5):483–496
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992b) Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J Mem Lang 31(2):261–292
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. J Mem Lang 35(3):371–391
Tversky B, Lee PU, Mainwaring S (1999) Why do speakers mix perspectives? Spat Cogn Comput 1(4):399–412
Vasardani M et al (2013) From descriptions to depictions: a conceptual framework. In: Tenbrink T et al (eds) Spatial information theory: 11th international conference, COSIT 2013. Springer, pp 299–319
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Löwen, H., Schwering, A., Krukar, J., Winter, S. (2017). Perspectives in Externalizations of Mental Spatial Representations. In: Bregt, A., Sarjakoski, T., van Lammeren, R., Rip, F. (eds) Societal Geo-innovation. AGILE 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56759-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56759-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56758-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56759-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)