Skip to main content

Longitudinal Genotype-Phenotype Association Study via Temporal Structure Auto-learning Predictive Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2017)

Abstract

With rapid progress in high-throughput genotyping and neuroimaging, imaging genetics has gained significant attention in the research of complex brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The genotype-phenotype association study using imaging genetic data has the potential to reveal genetic basis and biological mechanism of brain structure and function. AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, thus, it is crucial to look into the relations between SNPs and longitudinal variations of neuroimaging phenotypes. Although some machine learning models were newly presented to capture the longitudinal patterns in genotype-phenotype association study, most of them required fixed longitudinal structures of prediction tasks and could not automatically learn the interrelations among longitudinal prediction tasks. To address this challenge, we proposed a novel temporal structure auto-learning model to automatically uncover longitudinal genotype-phenotype interrelations and utilized such interrelated structures to enhance phenotype prediction in the meantime. We conducted longitudinal phenotype prediction experiments on the ADNI cohort including 3,123 SNPs and two types of imaging markers, VBM and FreeSurfer. Empirical results demonstrated advantages of our proposed model over the counterparts. Moreover, available literature was identified for our top selected SNPs, which demonstrated the rationality of our prediction results. An executable program is available online at https://github.com/littleq1991/sparse_lowRank_regression.

H. Huang—This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation [IIS 1302675 to H.H., IIS 1344152 to H.H., DBI 1356628 to H.H., IIS 1619308 to H.H., IIS 1633753 to H.H.] at UTA and [IIS 1622526 to L.S.] at IU; and by the National Institutes of Health [R01 LM011360 to L.S. and A.S., U01 AG024904 to Michael Weiner and A.S., RC2 AG036535 to Michael Weiner and A.S., R01 AG19771 to A.S., P30 AG10133 to A.S., UL1 TR001108 to Anantha Shekhar] and [R01 AG049371 to H.H.] at UTA.

ADNI—Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khachaturian, Z.S.: Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Neurol. 42(11), 1097–1105 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, A., Iliffe, S.: Alzheimer’s disease. BMJ 338, b158 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wenk, G.L., et al.: Neuropathologic changes in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Clin. Psychiatry 64, 7–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Association, A., et al.: 2016 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 12(4), 459–509 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrella, J.R., Coleman, R.E., Doraiswamy, P.M.: Neuroimaging and early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a look to the future 1. Radiology 226(2), 315–336 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hariri, A.R., Drabant, E.M., Weinberger, D.R.: Imaging genetics: perspectives from studies of genetically driven variation in serotonin function and corticolimbic affective processing. Biol. Psychiatry 59(10), 888–897 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Potkin, S.G., Guffanti, G., et al.: Hippocampal atrophy as a quantitative trait in a genome-wide association study identifying novel susceptibility genes for Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 4(8), e6501 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Potkin, S.G., Turner, J.A., et al.: Genome-wide strategies for discovering genetic influences on cognition and cognitive disorders: methodological considerations. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 14(4–5), 391–418 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harold, D., Abraham, R., et al.: Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 41(10), 1088–1093 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bis, J.C., DeCarli, C., et al.: Common variants at 12q14 and 12q24 are associated with hippocampal volume. Nat. Genet. 44(5), 545–551 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen, L., Kim, S., et al.: Whole genome association study of brain-wide imaging phenotypes for identifying quantitative trait loci in MCI and AD: a study of the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage 53(3), 1051–1063 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., Risacher, S., Saykin, A.J., Shen, L.: ADNI: joint classification and regression for identifying ad-sensitive and cognition-relevant imaging biomarkers. In: The 14th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 115–123 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., Kim, S., Nho, K., Risacher, S.L., Saykin, A.J., Shen, L.: Identifying quantitative trait loci via group-sparse multitask regression and feature selection: an imaging genetics study of the ADNI cohort. Bioinformatics 28(2), 229–237 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., Risacher, S.L., Saykin, A.J., Shen, L.: ADNI: identifying disease sensitive and quantitative trait relevant biomarkers from multi-dimensional heterogeneous imaging genetics data via sparse multi-modal multi-task learning. Bioinformatics 28(12), i127–i136 (2012). [20th Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB)]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashford, J.W., Schmitt, F.A.: Modeling the time-course of Alzheimer dementia. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 3(1), 20–28 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabatti, C., Service, S.K., et al.: Genome-wide association analysis of metabolic traits in a birth cohort from a founder population. Nat. Genet. 41(1), 35–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S., Sohn, K.A., et al.: A multivariate regression approach to association analysis of a quantitative trait network. Bioinformatics 25(12), i204–i212 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., et al.: From phenotype to genotype: an association study of longitudinal phenotypic markers to Alzheimer’s disease relevant SNPs. Bioinformatics 28(18), i619–i625 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H., Nie, F., et al.: High-order multi-task feature learning to identify longitudinal phenotypic markers for Alzheimer’s disease progression prediction. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1277–1285 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nie, F., Huang, H., Ding, C.H.: Low-rank matrix recovery via efficient Schatten p-norm minimization. In: AAAI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Obozinski, G., Taskar, B., Jordan, M.: Multi-task feature selection. Technical report, Statistics Department, UC Berkeley (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Candès, E.J.: The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. C. R. Math. 346(9), 589–592 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Cai, T.T., Zhang, A.: Sharp RIP bound for sparse signal and low-rank matrix recovery. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 35(1), 74–93 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bentler, P., Lee, S.Y.: Matrix derivatives with chain rule and rules for simple, Hadamard, and Kronecker products. J. Math. Psychol. 17(3), 255–262 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1970)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Bezdek, J.C., Hathaway, R.J.: Convergence of alternating optimization. Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 11(4), 351–368 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ji, S., Ye, J.: An accelerated gradient method for trace norm minimization. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 457–464. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Evgeniou, A., Pontil, M.: Multi-task feature learning. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 19, 41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saykin, A.J., Shen, L., et al.: Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative biomarkers as quantitative phenotypes: genetics core aims, progress, and plans. Alzheimers Dement. 6(3), 265–273 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertram, L., McQueen, M.B., et al.: Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat. Genet. 39(1), 17–23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y., Willer, C.J., et al.: MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet. Epidemiol 34(8), 816–834 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ashburner, J., Friston, K.J.: Voxel-based morphometry–the methods. Neuroimage 11(6 Pt 1), 805–821 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fischl, B., Salat, D.H., et al.: Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33(3), 341–355 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pereira, J.B., Cavallin, L., et al.: Influence of age, disease onset and ApoE4 on visual medial temporal lobe atrophy cut-offs. J. Intern. Med. 275(3), 317–330 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Andrawis, J.P., Hwang, K.S., et al.: Effects of ApoE4 and maternal history of dementia on hippocampal atrophy. Neurobiol. Aging 33(5), 856–866 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Risacher, S.L., Kim, S., Shen, L., et al.: The role of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype in early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI). Front Aging Neurosci. 5, 11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ma, J., Yu, J.T., Tan, L.: MS4A cluster in alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 51, 1240–1248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, X. et al. (2017). Longitudinal Genotype-Phenotype Association Study via Temporal Structure Auto-learning Predictive Model. In: Sahinalp, S. (eds) Research in Computational Molecular Biology. RECOMB 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10229. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56970-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56970-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56969-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56970-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics