Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have provided learners unprecedented opportunities to access university level education. As a form of largely free and self-paced education, MOOCs are less formal than credit-bearing university courses. It is often the case that MOOCs do not count toward a formal university qualification, and that majority learners enter MOOCs for various purposes other than specifically gaining a certificate. As a result, assessment and critical thinking, valued by universities as important learning outcomes are thought to be less relevant to MOOCs learners or designers. In the last couple of years, however, a few universities have started to design credit-bearing MOOCs as part of university programs. The aim is to encourage quality learning and outcomes that satisfy formal university assessment criteria. MOOCs designed to target particular groups of professionals for career advancement are also emerging. Both trends require a rethink of the relevance of assessment and critical thinking in MOOCs. This paper provides a case study of a MOOC targeted at health professionals, which demonstrates how self- and peer-assessment are designed to encourage critical thinking, and includes a discussion on future directions and constraints of this work-in-progress. The paper proposes that critical thinking is relevant for learning in MOOCs and that carefully designed assessment tasks are essential for developing MOOCs’ learners’ critical thinking.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Jordan, K.: Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(1) (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
Chen, Z., Alcorn, B., Christensen, G., Eriksson, N., Koller, D., Emanuel, E.J.: Who’s Benefiting from MOOCs, and Why. Harvard Business Review, 22 September 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why. Accessed 29 Oct 2015
Kumar, S., Mishra, A.K.: MOOCs: a new pedagogy of online digital learning. Int. J. Sci. Innov. Res. Stud. 3(4), 8–15 (2015)
Kop, R.: The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: learning experiences during a massive open online course. Int. Rev. Res. Online Distrib. Learn. 12(3) 20–38 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
Bates, T.: What’s right and what’s wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs (Web log post). Online Learning and distance education resources, 5 August 2012. http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., Mustain, P.: Learning in MOOCs: motivations & self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet High. Educ. 29, 40–48 (2016)
Chauhan, A.: Massive open online courses (MOOCS): emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Digit. Educ. Rev. 25, 7–17 (2014)
Gardiner, L.F.: Redesigning Higher Education: producing dramatic gains in student learning. Report seven. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports 23–229 (1994)
Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., Pilli, O.: Assessment in massive open online courses. Electron. J. e-Learn. 13(4), 207–216 (2015)
Suen, H.K.: Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15(3) (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1680. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
Mason, M.: Critical thinking and learning. Educ. Philos. Theor. 39(4), 339–349 (2007)
Bermingham, M.: Cleaning up ‘critical thinking’: its four formidable features. Creat. Educ. 6, 421–427 (2015)
Fife, J.D.: Cognitive process in critical thinking. ASHE-High. Educ. Rep. 17(2), 25–49 (1988). doi:10.1002/aehe.3640170207
Athanasou, J., Lamprianou, I.: A teacher’s guide to assessment, p. 3. Soc. Sci. Press, Sydney (2002)
Falchikov, N.: Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement, pp. 139–141. RoutledgeFalmer, London (2005)
Boud, D.: Enhancing Learning through Self Assessment, pp. 14–25. Kogan Page, London (1995)
Burbach, M.E., Matkin, G.S., Fritz, S.M.: Teaching critical thinking in an introductory leadership course utilizing active learning strategies: a confirmatory study. Coll. Stud. J. 38(3), 482 (2004)
Vigentini, L., Zhao, C.: Evaluating the ‘Student’ experience in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 161–164. ACM, April 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, C., Bhalla, S., Halliday, L., Travaglia, J., Kennedy, J. (2017). Exploring the Role of Assessment in Developing Learners’ Critical Thinking in Massive Open Online Courses. In: Delgado Kloos, C., Jermann, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Seaton, D., White, S. (eds) Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus. EMOOCs 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10254. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59043-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59044-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)