Abstract
Electric vehicles are currently seen as the most promising approach for the mobility sector to do it’s bit for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Although, there are still impediments to adoption, which may partly be overcome by a fast charging infrastructure that enables long-haul trips with battery electric vehicles (BEV). The presented work aims at weighing up user specific parameters of a charging infrastructure (range, charging time, network density, location) to understand public acceptance and reflect advice for planning a needs-based fast-charging network. Using an online questionnaire, 176 participants (users and non-users of BEVs) were addressed in a choice-based conjoint approach. Charging time emerged to be the most influential factor, followed by driving range and charging locations. Significant differences were found between BEV-users and non-users, with BEV-users putting more emphasis on the charging locations and less on the range.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)—03/08/17: Paris Agreement. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf
Bundesregierung - 03/08/17: Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität. https://www.bmbf.de/files/nationaler_entwicklungsplan_elektromobilitaet.pdf
Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt – 03/08/17: Personenkraftwagen am 1. Januar 2016 nach ausgewählten Merkmalen. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt. http://www.kba.de/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Bestand/Umwelt/2016_b_umwelt_dusl.html?nn=663524
Jarass, J., Frenzel, I., Trommer, S.: Early Adopter der Elektromobilitaet in Deutschland - Wer sie sind und wie sie fahren. Internationales Verkehrswesen 66(2), 70–72 (2014)
Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P.: Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33(3), 686–705 (2011)
Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012)
Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Kasugai, K., Schwalm, M.: Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability, pp. 628–639. Springer (2014)
Halbey, J., Kowalewski, S., Ziefle, M.: Going on a road-trip with my electric car—acceptance criteria for long-distance-use of electric vehicles. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability—Interactive Experience Design, pp. 473–484. Springer (2015)
Vassileva, I., Madlener. R.: Perceptions and adoption of EVs for private use and policy lessons learned. In: Veneri, O. (ed.) Technologies and Applications for Smart Charging of Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles, pp. 283–300. Springer, Cham (2017)
Frischknecht, R., Flury, K.: Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16(7), 691–695 (2011)
Kley, F., Lerch, C., Dallinger, D.: New business models for electric cars—a holistic approach. Energy Policy 39(6), 3392–3403 (2011)
Sourkounis, C., Bingchang, N., Broy, A.: Pollution of high power charging electric vehicles in urban distribution grids. In: Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE), 7th International Conference-Workshop, pp. 33–39. IEEE (2011)
Rauh, N., Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: User experience with electric vehicles while driving in a critical range situation—a qualitative approach. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 9(7), 734–739 (2015)
Franke, T., GĂ¼nther, M., Trantow, M., Rauh, N., Krems, J.F.: The range comfort zone of electric vehicle users—concept and assessment. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, Vienna (2014)
GonzĂ¡lez, J., Alvaro, R., Gamallo, C., Fuentes, M., Fraile-Ardanuy, J., Knapen, L., Janssens, D.: Determining electric vehicle charging point locations considering drivers’ daily activities. Procedia Comput. Sci. 32, 647–654 (2014)
Shahraki, N., Cai, H., Turkay, M., Xu, M.: Optimal locations of electric public charging stations using real world vehicle travel patterns. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 41, 165–176 (2015)
Bernardo, V., Borrell, J.R., Perdiguero, J.: Fast charging stations: simulating entry and location in a game of strategic interaction. Energy Econ. 60, 293–305 (2016)
Javid, R.J., Nejat, A.: A comprehensive model of regional electric vehicle adoption and penetration. Transp. Policy 54, 30–42 (2017)
Jabeen, F., Smith, B., Olaru, D., Greaves, S.: Electric vehicles adoption: environmental enthusiast bias in discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 51, 290–303 (2017). Sydney
Rauh, N., Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety. Hum. Factors 57(1), 177–187 (2014)
Zaunbrecher, B.S., Beul-Leusmann, S., Ziefle, M.: Laypeople’s perspectives on electromobility—a focus group study. internet of things. In: Giaffreda, R., CagĂ¡novĂ¡, D., Li, Y., Riggio, R., Voisard, A. (eds.) IoT Infrastructures, pp. 144–149. Springer, Cham (2014)
Schmalfub, F., MĂ¼hl, K., Krems, J.F.: Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 46, 47–69 (2017)
Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., van Heek, J., Ziefle, M.: Fast-charging station here, please! User criteria for electric vehicle fast-charging locations. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 40, 119–129 (2016)
Duncan, L.R., Tukey, J.W.: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1(1), 1–27 (1964)
Orme, B.: Interpreting the Results of Conjoint Analysis, Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, pp. 77–89. Research Publications LLC, Madison (2010)
Parasuraman, A.: Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J. Serv. Res. 2(4), 307–320 (2000)
Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., Ziefle, M.: Well worth a detour? - Users’ preferences regarding the attributes of fast-charging infrastructure for electromobility. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pp. 937–950. Springer, Cham (2017)
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology (Project SLAM, reference no. 01 MX 13007F). The authors thank all participants for their patience and openness to share opinions on a novel technology. Furthermore, authors owe gratitude to Dr. Sylvia Kowalewski for highly valuable research input.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Halbey, J., Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., Ziefle, M. (2018). Range Makes All the Difference? Weighing up Range, Charging Time and Fast-Charging Network Density as Key Drivers for the Acceptance of Battery Electric Vehicles. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_90
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_90
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)