Skip to main content

Range Makes All the Difference? Weighing up Range, Charging Time and Fast-Charging Network Density as Key Drivers for the Acceptance of Battery Electric Vehicles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 597))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Electric vehicles are currently seen as the most promising approach for the mobility sector to do it’s bit for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Although, there are still impediments to adoption, which may partly be overcome by a fast charging infrastructure that enables long-haul trips with battery electric vehicles (BEV). The presented work aims at weighing up user specific parameters of a charging infrastructure (range, charging time, network density, location) to understand public acceptance and reflect advice for planning a needs-based fast-charging network. Using an online questionnaire, 176 participants (users and non-users of BEVs) were addressed in a choice-based conjoint approach. Charging time emerged to be the most influential factor, followed by driving range and charging locations. Significant differences were found between BEV-users and non-users, with BEV-users putting more emphasis on the charging locations and less on the range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)—03/08/17: Paris Agreement. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

  2. Bundesregierung - 03/08/17: Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität. https://www.bmbf.de/files/nationaler_entwicklungsplan_elektromobilitaet.pdf

  3. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt – 03/08/17: Personenkraftwagen am 1. Januar 2016 nach ausgewählten Merkmalen. Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt. http://www.kba.de/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Bestand/Umwelt/2016_b_umwelt_dusl.html?nn=663524

  4. Jarass, J., Frenzel, I., Trommer, S.: Early Adopter der Elektromobilitaet in Deutschland - Wer sie sind und wie sie fahren. Internationales Verkehrswesen 66(2), 70–72 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P.: Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33(3), 686–705 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziefle, M., Beul-Leusmann, S., Kasugai, K., Schwalm, M.: Public perception and acceptance of electric vehicles: exploring users’ perceived benefits and drawbacks. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability, pp. 628–639. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Halbey, J., Kowalewski, S., Ziefle, M.: Going on a road-trip with my electric car—acceptance criteria for long-distance-use of electric vehicles. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability—Interactive Experience Design, pp. 473–484. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vassileva, I., Madlener. R.: Perceptions and adoption of EVs for private use and policy lessons learned. In: Veneri, O. (ed.) Technologies and Applications for Smart Charging of Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles, pp. 283–300. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Frischknecht, R., Flury, K.: Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16(7), 691–695 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kley, F., Lerch, C., Dallinger, D.: New business models for electric cars—a holistic approach. Energy Policy 39(6), 3392–3403 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sourkounis, C., Bingchang, N., Broy, A.: Pollution of high power charging electric vehicles in urban distribution grids. In: Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE), 7th International Conference-Workshop, pp. 33–39. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rauh, N., Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: User experience with electric vehicles while driving in a critical range situation—a qualitative approach. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 9(7), 734–739 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franke, T., GĂ¼nther, M., Trantow, M., Rauh, N., Krems, J.F.: The range comfort zone of electric vehicle users—concept and assessment. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, Vienna (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. GonzĂ¡lez, J., Alvaro, R., Gamallo, C., Fuentes, M., Fraile-Ardanuy, J., Knapen, L., Janssens, D.: Determining electric vehicle charging point locations considering drivers’ daily activities. Procedia Comput. Sci. 32, 647–654 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shahraki, N., Cai, H., Turkay, M., Xu, M.: Optimal locations of electric public charging stations using real world vehicle travel patterns. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 41, 165–176 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernardo, V., Borrell, J.R., Perdiguero, J.: Fast charging stations: simulating entry and location in a game of strategic interaction. Energy Econ. 60, 293–305 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Javid, R.J., Nejat, A.: A comprehensive model of regional electric vehicle adoption and penetration. Transp. Policy 54, 30–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jabeen, F., Smith, B., Olaru, D., Greaves, S.: Electric vehicles adoption: environmental enthusiast bias in discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 51, 290–303 (2017). Sydney

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rauh, N., Franke, T., Krems, J.F.: Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety. Hum. Factors 57(1), 177–187 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zaunbrecher, B.S., Beul-Leusmann, S., Ziefle, M.: Laypeople’s perspectives on electromobility—a focus group study. internet of things. In: Giaffreda, R., CagĂ¡novĂ¡, D., Li, Y., Riggio, R., Voisard, A. (eds.) IoT Infrastructures, pp. 144–149. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schmalfub, F., MĂ¼hl, K., Krems, J.F.: Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 46, 47–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., van Heek, J., Ziefle, M.: Fast-charging station here, please! User criteria for electric vehicle fast-charging locations. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 40, 119–129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duncan, L.R., Tukey, J.W.: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1(1), 1–27 (1964)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Orme, B.: Interpreting the Results of Conjoint Analysis, Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, pp. 77–89. Research Publications LLC, Madison (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parasuraman, A.: Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J. Serv. Res. 2(4), 307–320 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., Ziefle, M.: Well worth a detour? - Users’ preferences regarding the attributes of fast-charging infrastructure for electromobility. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pp. 937–950. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology (Project SLAM, reference no. 01 MX 13007F). The authors thank all participants for their patience and openness to share opinions on a novel technology. Furthermore, authors owe gratitude to Dr. Sylvia Kowalewski for highly valuable research input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Philipsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Halbey, J., Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., Ziefle, M. (2018). Range Makes All the Difference? Weighing up Range, Charging Time and Fast-Charging Network Density as Key Drivers for the Acceptance of Battery Electric Vehicles. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_90

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics