We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Reflections on Patrick Baert’s The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual | SpringerLink

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflections on Patrick Baert’s The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual

Simon Susen

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • First Online:
The Sociology of Intellectuals

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this chapter, Simon Susen provides an in-depth review of Patrick Baert’s The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015), focusing on the theoretical dimensions underpinning the analysis developed in this book. The chapter is divided into two parts. In the first part, Susen gives a detailed, and largely sympathetic, overview of Baert’s approach, drawing attention to its main conceptual and methodological contributions to the sociological study of intellectuals. In the second part, Susen grapples with the limitations and shortcomings of Baert’s approach, especially with respect to its plea for a paradigm shift from a ‘vocabulary of intentions’ to a ‘vocabulary of effects’ in the sociology of intellectuals. The chapter concludes with a brief reflection on the role that intellectuals may play in shaping the development of society.

An abridged version of this chapter was presented on 19th June 2015 at the 14th Annual Conference of the International Social Theory Consortium (on Reconstructing Social Theory, History and Practice), which took place between 17th and 19th June 2015 at the University of Cambridge, UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearne, Jeremy and Oliver Bennett (eds.) (2007) Intellectuals and Cultural Policy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, Steffen (2002) ‘Netzwerke als Kapital. Zur unterschätzten Bedeutung des sozialen Kapitals für die gesellschaftliche Reproduktion’, in Jörg Ebrecht and Frank Hillebrandt (eds.) Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis: Erklärungskraft – Anwendung – Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., Ron Eyerman, Bernard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser, and Piotr Sztompka (2004) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David (1980) Marxism and Existentialism. The Political Philosophy of Satire and Merleau-Ponty, Belfast: Blackstaff Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athique, Adrian (2013) Digital Media and Society: An Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (1998a) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (1998b) ‘The Spread of Reason: Habermas’s Critical Theory’, in Patrick Baert, Social Theory in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (2003) ‘Pragmatism versus Sociological Hermeneutics’, Current Perspectives in Social Theory 22: 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (2005a) Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (2005b) ‘Critical Theory’, in Patrick Baert, Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 106–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick (2015) The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Joel Isaac (2011) ‘Intellectuals and Society: Sociological and Historical Perspectives’, in Gerard Delanty and Stephen P. Turner (eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick, Sokratis M. Koniordos, Giovanna Procacci, and Carlo Ruzza (eds.) (2010) Conflict, Citizenship and Civil Society, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Alan Shipman (2005) ‘University under Siege? Trust and Accountability in the Contemporary Academy’, European Societies 7(1): 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Alan Shipman (2012) ‘Transformation of the Intellectual’, in Fernando Domínguez Rubio and Patrick Baert (eds.) The Politics of Knowledge, London: Routledge, pp. 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Filipe Carreira da Silva (2010 [1998]-a) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond, 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Filipe Carreira da Silva (2010 [1998]-b) ‘The Spread of Reason: Habermas’s Critical Theory and Beyond’, in Patrick Baert and Filipe Carreira da Silva, Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond, 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Filipe Carreira da Silva (2013) ‘Pragmatism Defended: A Reply to Simon Susen’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 14(1): 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Bryan S. Turner (2004) ‘New Pragmatism and Old Europe: Introduction to the Debate between Pragmatist Philosophy and European Social and Political Theory’, European Journal of Social Theory 7(3): 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, Patrick and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) (2007) Pragmatism and European Social Theory, Oxford: Bardwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, Claudio, Giancarlo Corsi, and Elena Esposito (1997) GLU. Glossar zu Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Gregory (1977) Truth Beyond Relativism: Karl Mannheim’s Sociology of Knowledge, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautista, Juan José (1987) ‘Realidad, práctica social y construcción del conocimiento: en torno del problema del compromiso intelectual’, Revista Mexicana de Sociología XLIX(1): 109–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym, Nancy K. (2014 [2010]) Personal Connections in the Digital Age, 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley-Murray, Jon (2000) ‘Value and Capital in Bourdieu and Marx’, in Nicholas Brown and Imre Szeman (eds.) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker Lorca, Arnulf (2014) Mestizo International Law. A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, Raphael (2006) ‘Der Beobachter im Milieu. Anmerkungen zum Verhältnis zwischen Bourdieu und Luhmann’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31(1): 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W. and Rosa Llamas (eds.) (2013) The Routledge Companion to Digital Consumption, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Tony (2007) Critical Trajectories: Culture, Society, Intellectuals, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Stephen D. (1991) The Development of Legitimating Ideas. Intellectuals and Politicians in Post-War Western Germany, New York: Garland Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri (1945 [1907]) L’évolution créatrice, Genève: Albert Skira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, Henri (2007 [1907]) Creative Evolution, with an introduction by Keith Ansell Pearson, edited by Keith Ansell Pearson, Michael Kolkman, and Michael Vaughan, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Ronald (1968) America in the Sixties: An Intellectual History, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethell, Leslie (ed.) (1996) Ideas and Ideologies in Twentieth-Century Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, Albrecth and Stefan Martens (eds.) (2004) Les intellectuels et l’occupation, Paris: Éditions Autrement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhoite, Uttam Bajirao (1987) Sociology of Indian Intellectuals, Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. J. (2000) ‘The Philosophy of Historiography?’, History and Theory 39(2): 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (1999) ‘Practical Reason and Cultural Constraint: Agency in Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice’, in Richard Shusterman (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, Cornelia (1991) Habitus und Kontext. Ein kritischer Beitrag zur Sozialtheorie Bourdieus, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, Cornelia (2005) ‘Eine Welt-Gesellschaft. Operative Gesellschaftskonzepte in den Sozialtheorien Luhmanns und Bourdieus’, in Catherine Colliot-Thélène, Etienne François, and Gunter Gebauer (eds.) Pierre Bourdieu: Deutsch-französische Perspektiven, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (1990) ‘Sociologie critique et sociologie de la critique’, Politix 10–11: 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (1998) ‘Critique sociale et sens moral. Pour une sociologie du jugement’, in Tetsuji Yamamoto (ed.) Philosophical Designs for a Socio-Cultural Transformation: Beyond Violence and the Modern Era, Tokyo; Boulder, Colo.: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Culturelles; Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 248–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (1999–2000) ‘Une sociologie sans société ?’, Le genre humain, Hiver-Printemps: 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc (2008) Rendre la réalité inacceptable. À propos de “La production de l’idéologie dominante”, Paris: Demopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti, Anna (1985) Sartre et « Les Temps Modernes ». Une entreprise intellectuelle, Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti, Anna (1988 [1985]) The Intellectual Enterprise. Sartre and ‘Les Temps Modernes’, trans. Richard McCleary, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1972) Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Précédé de Trois études d’ethnologie kabyle, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1975) ‘L’ontologie politique de Martin Heidegger’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 5–6: 109–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1977 [1972]) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1979a) La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1979b) ‘Les trois états du capital culturel’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 30: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1982) ‘La production et la reproduction de la langue légitime’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques, Paris: Fayard, pp. 23–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) ‘Le hit-parade des intellectuels français ou qui sera juge de la légitimité des juges?’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 52–53: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1988) L’ontologie politique de Martin Heidegger, Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) ‘Droit et passe-droit. Le champ des pouvoirs territoriaux et la mise en œuvre des règlements’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 81–82: 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993a) The Field of Cultural Production, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993b) ‘Concluding Remarks: For a Sociogenetic Understanding of Intellectual Works’, in Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993c) ‘À propos de Sartre…’, French Cultural Studies 4(3): 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993 [1984]-a) ‘Are Intellectuals Out of Play?’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Sociology in Question, London: Sage, pp. 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993 [1984]-b) ‘How Can “Free-Floating Intellectuals” Be Set Free?’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Sociology in Question, London: Sage, pp. 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993 [1984]-c) ‘Culture and Politics’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Sociology in Question, London: Sage, pp. 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1993 [1984]-d) ‘The Racism of “Intelligence”’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Sociology in Question, London: Sage, pp. 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (2002) ‘Wittgenstein, le sociologisme & la science sociale’, in Jacques Bouveresse, Sandra Laugier, and Jean-Jacques Rosat (eds.) Wittgenstein, dernières pensées, Marseille: Fondation Hugot du Collège de France, Agone, pp. 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (2004) Esquisse pour une auto-analyse, Paris: Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Luc Boltanski (2008 [1976]) La production de l’idéologie dominante, Paris: Demopolis / Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Terry Eagleton (1992) ‘Doxa and Common Life’, New Left Review 191: 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron (1964) Les héritiers : les étudiants et la culture, Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron (1970) La reproduction. Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement, Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourg, Julian (ed.) (2004) After the Deluge: New Perspectives on the Intellectual and Cultural History of Postwar France, Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouveresse, Jacques (1995) ‘Règles, dispositions et habitus’, Critique LI(579–580): 573–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozóki, András (ed.) (1999) Intellectuals and Politics in Central Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Nicholas and Imre Szeman (eds.) (2000) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Craig and Simon Susen (2014) ‘Austerity and Its Antitheses: Practical Negations of Capitalist Legitimacy’, South Atlantic Quarterly 113(2): 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brym, Robert J. (1980) Intellectuals and Politics, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael (2005) ‘2004 ASA Presidential Address: For Public Sociology’, American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael [et al.] (2000) Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael, William Gamson, Charlotte Ryan, Stephen Pfohl, Diane Vaughan, Charles Derber, and Juliet Schor (2004) ‘Public Sociologies: A Symposium from Boston College’, Social Problems 51(1): 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda, Hubert (ed.) (2011) The Digital Wunderkammer: 10 Chapters on the Iconic Turn, Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burguière, André (2009 [2006]) The Annales School: An Intellectual History, trans. Jane Marie Todd, foreword by Timothy Tackett, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahm, Eric (1996 [1994]) The Dreyfus Affair in French Society and Politics, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, Charles (1987) ‘The Making of a Method: A Historical Reinterpretation of the Early Parsons’, American Sociological Review 52(4): 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, Charles (1992) ‘Reputation and Predecessor Selection: Parsons and the Institutionalists’, American Sociological Review 57(4): 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celikates, Robin (2009) Kritik als soziale Praxis. Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebel d’Appolonia, Ariane (1991) Histoire politique des intellectuels en France (1944–1954). Tome 1 : Des lendemains qui déchantent, Paris: Complexe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, John (1990) ‘Making Distinctions: The Eye of the Beholder’, in Richard Harker, Cheleen Mahar, and Chris Wilkes (eds.) An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory, London: Macmillan, pp. 132–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Solal, Annie (2005 [1987/1985]) Jean-Paul Sartre. A Life, trans. Anna Cancogni, edited by Norman Macafee, New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan (2006) Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies. A Global Theory of Intellectual Change, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Ciaran (1997) ‘Epistemological Vigilance and the Project of a Sociology of Knowledge’, Social Epistemology 11(2): 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré (1990) ‘Positioning the Discursive Production of Selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, Régis (1979) Le pouvoir intellectuel en France, Paris: Ramsay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, Régis (1981 [1979]) Teachers, Writers, Celebrities. The Intellectuals of Modern France, introduction by Francis Mulhern, trans. David Macey, London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Sandra McGee and Ronald H. Dolkart (eds.) (1993) The Argentine Right. Its History and Intellectual Origins, 1910 to the Present, Wilmington, Del.: SR Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, David (2005) Sartre, London: Haus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreßen, Wolfgang (ed.) (1971) Intellektuelle: Konterrevolutionäre oder Proleten? Berlin: Wagenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1966/1951 [1897]) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1982 [1895]) The Rules of Sociological Method, trans. W. D. Halls, First American Edition, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (2010 [1924]) Sociology and Philosophy, trans. David Francis Pocock, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry (1989) Raymond Williams: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Iain (2015) ‘The Role of Intellectuals in the State-Society Nexus’, South African Journal of Science 111(5–6): 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekirch, Arthur Alphonse (1963) American Intellectual History, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, John and Lizzie Eldridge (1994) Raymond Williams: Making Connections, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliæson, Sven and Ragnvald Kalleberg (2008) Academics as Public Intellectuals, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai (2006) ‘Public Intellectuals. An Endangered Species?’, in Amitai Etzioni and Alyssa Bowditch (eds.) Public Intellectuals. An Endangered Species? Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai and Alyssa Bowditch (eds.) (2006) Public Intellectuals. An Endangered Species? Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, Ron (1994) Between Culture and Politics: Intellectuals in Modern Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, Ron, Jeffrey C. Alexander, and Elizabeth Butler Breese (eds.) (2011) Narrating Trauma. On the Impact of Collective Suffering, Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani, Jean-Louis (1999) ‘Les règles du champ’, in Bernard Lahire (ed.) Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu : dettes et critiques, Paris: La Découverte & Syros, pp. 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Michael P. (2001) Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Christian and Andreas Hess (eds.) (2014) Knowledge for Whom? Public Sociology in the Making, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, Marion (2009) Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Bridget (1997) Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickel, Scott and Neil Gross (2005) ‘A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements’, American Sociological Review 70(2): 204–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, Philippe (2005) ‘Contre le totémisme intellectuel’, in Gérard Mauger (ed.) Rencontres avec Pierre Bourdieu, Broissieux, Bellecombe-en-Bauges: Éditions du Croquant, pp. 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Peter (1993 [1992]) Niklas Luhmann – beobachtet. Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie, 2nd Edition, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis (1992) The End of History and the Last Man, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (2005) The Intellectual. The Positive Power of Negative Thinking, Thriplow: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (2009) The Sociology of Intellectual Life. The Career of the Mind in and around the Academy, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, Frank (2004) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Confronting 21st-Century Philistinism, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, Frank (2006 [2004]) Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone? Including ‘A Reply to Furedi’s Critics’, 2nd Edition, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, Ingrid (ed.) (2001a) La naissance du phénomène Sartre. Raisons d’un succès, 1938–1945, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, Ingrid (2001b) Sartre, Vichy et les intellectuels, Paris: Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, Andrew, David Marsh, and Tony Tant (eds.) (1999) Marxism and Social Science, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartman, David (2002) ‘Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Change: Explication, Application, and Critique’, Sociological Theory 20(2): 421–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, Claude (2001) ‘La sociologie de l’accord. Justification contre déterminisme et domination’, Politix 54: 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, Gunter (2000) ‘Habitus, Intentionality, and Social Rules: A Controversy between Searle and Bourdieu’, SubStance 29(3): 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gella, Aleksander (ed.) (1976) The Intelligentsia and the Intellectuals. Theory, Method and Case-Study, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving (1971 [1959]) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, Jeffrey C. (1998) Civility and Subversion. The Intellectual in Democratic Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin Ward (1985) Against Fragmentation. The Origins of Marxism and the Sociology of Intellectuals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward (1996) The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages. Their Religious, Institutional, and Intellectual Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenhagen, Martin (1986) Propheten, Rebellen und Minister: Intellektuelle in der Politik, München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Neil (2002) ‘Becoming a Pragmatist Philosopher: Status, Self-Concept, and Intellectual Choice’, American Sociological Review 67(1): 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Neil (2008) Richard Rorty. The Making of an American Philosopher, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald, Michel and Hans Manfred Bock (eds.) (2002) Le milieu intellectuel de gauche en Allemagne, sa presse et ses réseaux (1890–1960), Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1982) ‘A Reply to my Critics’, in John B. Thompson and David Held (eds.) Habermas: Critical Debates, London: Macmillan, pp. 219–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1984 [1976]) ‘What is Universal Pragmatics?’, in Jürgen Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-a) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-b) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-c) ‘Intermediate Reflections: Social Action, Purposive Activity, and Communication’, in Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 273–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-d) ‘The Concept of the Lifeworld and the Hermeneutic Idealism of Interpretive Sociology’, in Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-e) ‘The Uncoupling of System and Lifeworld’, in Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 153–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]-f) ‘Marx and the Thesis of Internal Colonization’, in Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 332–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1985]-a) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1985]-b) ‘Excursus on Luhmann’s Appropriation of the Philosophy of the Subject through Systems Theory’, in Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 368–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1988 [1967/1970]) On the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1998 [1976, 1981, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1996]) On the Pragmatics of Communication, edited by Maeve Cooke, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2001) Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte Vernunft, Stuttgart: Reclam, Ditzingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2004) ‘Freiheit und Determinismus’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52(6): 871–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Alois (1991) ‘Vorwort’, in Cornelia Bohn, Habitus und Kontext. Ein kritischer Beitrag zur Sozialtheorie Bourdieus, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Philip (2011) ‘Simulation and Dissimulation’, Journal of War and Culture Studies 3(3): 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, David Paul (2008) The Americanization of Social Science: Intellectuals and Public Responsibility in the Postwar United States, Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuschek, Sven, Therese Hörnigk, and Christine Malende (eds.) (2000) Schriftsteller als Intellektuelle: Politik und Literatur im Kalten Krieg, Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, Rom (1993 [1979]) Social Being, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove (1998) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, Rom, Fathali M. Moghaddam, Tracey Pilkerton Cairnie, Daniel Rothbart, and Steven R. Sabat (2009) ‘Recent Advances in Positioning Theory’, Theory & Psychology 19(1): 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, Brian and James Walter (eds.) (1988) Intellectual Movements and Australian Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herf, Jeffrey (1984) Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, Andrew (2007 [1992]) Political Ideologies: An Introduction, 4th Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, John (1999) Raymond Williams: Literature, Marxism and Cultural Materialism, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, Arthur (1981) French New Left. An Intellectual History from Sartre to Gorz, Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric (1994) Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991, London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeveler, J. David (1991) Watch on the Right: Conservative Intellectuals in the Reagan Era, Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John (2002) ‘The Narrowing of Marxism’, in Ana C. Dinerstein and Mike Neary (eds.) The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Reality of Capitalist Work, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John (2005) ‘No’, Historical Materialism 13(4): 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John (2005 [2002]) Change the World without Taking Power. The Meaning of Revolution Today, New Edition, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John (2007) ‘Twelve Theses on Changing the World without Taking Power’, in Phil Hearse (ed.) Take the Power to Change the World: Globalisation and the Debate on Power, London: Socialist Resistance Books, pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John (2010) Crack Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, John and Simon Susen (2013) ‘Change the World by Cracking Capitalism? A Critical Encounter between John Holloway and Simon Susen’, Sociological Analysis 7(1): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel (1984) ‘Die zerrissene Welt der symbolischen Formen. Zum kultursoziologischen Werk Pierre Bourdieus’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 36(1): 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, David (2003) Left Illusions. An Intellectual Odyssey, edited, with an Introduction by, Jamie Glazov, Dallas: Spence Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks, Chris (1999) Baudrillard and the Millennium, Duxford: Icon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, David (2013) ‘Bourdieu, Language and “Determinism”: A Reply to Simon Susen’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim (1986) Evolution and Social Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachec, Nancy (2015) Europe’s Intellectuals and the Cold War. The European Society of Culture, Post-War Politics and International Relations, London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Ronald N. and Eleanor R. Townsley (2011) The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Russell (2000 [1897]) The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of Academe, New Edition, New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Jeremy (ed.) (1992) Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century France: Mandarins and Samurais, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Jeremy and A. Kemp-Welch (eds.) (1997) Intellectuals in Politics. From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Paul (2004) Raymond Williams’s Sociology of Culture: A Critical Reconstruction, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, Tony (1992) Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1944–1956, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julliard, Jacques and Michel Winock (2009 [1996]) Dictionnaire des intellectuels français : les personnes, les lieux, les moments, nouvelle édition, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, Barbara, Zane Berzina, Walter Scheiffele, Wim Westerveld, and Carola Zwick (eds.) (2013) The Digital Turn: Design in the Era of Interactive Technologies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurt, Joseph (2004) ‘Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002). Eine Soziologie der symbolischen Güter’, in Martin Ludwig Hofmann, Tobias F. Korta, and Sibylle Niekisch (eds.) Culture Club. Klassiker der Kulturtheorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1979 [1798]) The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. Mary J. Gregor, New York, N.Y.: Abaris Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (2003 [1785]) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Arnulf Zweig, edited by Thomas E. Hill, Jr. and Arnulf Zweig, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (2009 [1784]) An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Alice Yaeger (1986) Reproductions of Banality. Fascism, Literature, and French Intellectual Life, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsenti, Bruno (2012 [2006]) ‘Sociology Face to Face with Pragmatism: Action, Concept, and Person’, trans. Simon Susen, Journal of Classical Sociology 12(3–4): 398–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, Niilo (2000) ‘The Sociologist as Moraliste: Pierre Bourdieu’s Practice of Theory and the French Intellectual Tradition’, SubStance 29(3): 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, Niilo (2010) Radicalism in French Culture. A Sociology of French Theory in the 1960s, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas (2007) ‘Reappraising the Postmodern: Novelties, Mapping and Historical Narratives’, in Pelagia Goulimari (ed.) Postmodernism. What Moment? Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 102–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Michael (2004) The Cultural and Intellectual Rebuilding of France after the Second World War, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, David, Colin Loader, and Volker Meja (2008) Karl Mannheim and the Legacy of Max Weber: Retrieving a Research Programme, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khilnani, Sunil (1993) Arguing Revolution: The Intellectual Left in Postwar France, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Lawrence P. and Iván Szelényi (2004) Theories of the New Class: Intellectuals and Power, Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneer, Georg (2004) ‘Differenzierung bei Luhmann und Bourdieu. Ein Theorievergleich’, in Armin Nassehi and Gerd Nollmann (eds.) Bourdieu und Luhmann. Ein Theorievergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, Hans-Herbert (1997) ‘Alienation as Epistemological Source: Reflexivity and Social Background after Mannheim and Bourdieu’, Social Epistemology 11(2): 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, Hans-Herbert (2013) ‘Unavoidable Idealizations and the Reality of Symbolic Power’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnl, Reinhard (1983) Formen bürgerlicher Herrschaft: Liberalismus, Faschismus, Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnl, Reinhard (1990 [1979]) Faschismustheorien. Ein Leitfaden, Aktualisierte Neuauflage, Heilbronn: Distel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, Scott (1993) ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change’, in Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, Steph (2004) ‘Rules of Engagement: Habitus, Power and Resistance’, The Sociological Review 52(s2): 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leak, Andrew N. (2006) Jean-Paul Sartre, London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, Charles C. (ed.) (1991) Intellectuals and Politics: Social Theory in a Changing World, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, Ralph (1979) Brecht as Thinker: Studies in Literary Marxism and Existentialism, Normal, Ill.: Applied Literature Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LiPuma, Edward (1993) ‘Culture and the Concept of Culture in a Theory of Practice’, in Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Brian (1997) Left Out: Pragmatism, Exceptionalism, and the Poverty of American Marxism, 1890–1922, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Imogen (2013) Women Intellectuals in Post-68 France: Petitions and Polemics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, Brian (1989) Karl Mannheim and the Contemporary Sociology of Knowledge, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1995 [1984]) Social Systems, trans. John Bednarz, Jr., with Dirk Baecker, foreword by Eva M. Knodt, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (2002) Einführung in die Systemtheorie, Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, György (1951) Existentialismus oder Marxismus? Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Heather (2000) The Burden of Bad Ideas: How Modern Intellectuals Misshape Our Society, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, Ian (1980) The Renaissance Notion of Woman. A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahar, Cheleen (1990) ‘Pierre Bourdieu: The Intellectual Project’, in Richard Harker, Cheleen Mahar, and Chris Wilkes (eds.) An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 26–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maigret, Éric (2002) ‘Pierre Bourdieu, la culture populaire et le long remords de la sociologie de la distinction culturelle’, Esprit 283: 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, Yogendra K. (1979) North Indian Intellectuals: An Attitudinal Profile, Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1991 [1936/1929]) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, trans. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils, New Edition, Preface by Louis Wirth, Preface to the New Edition by Bryan S. Turner, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1997 [1940/1935]) Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure, trans. Edward Shils, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1997 [1951]) Freedom, Power and Democratic Planning, with a note by Ernest K. Branstedt [i.e. Bramstedt] and Hans Gerth, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1997 [1952]) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Paul Kecskemeti, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1997 [1980/1922–1924]) Structures of Thinking, text and translation edited and introduced by David Kettler, Volker Meja and Nico Stehr, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro and Shierry Webar Nicholsen, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (1997 [1986/1925]) Conservatism: A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge, edited and introduced by David Kettler, Volker Meja, and Nico Stehr, trans. David Kettler and Volker Meja, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl (2001 [1930]) Sociology as Political Education, edited and translated by David Kettler and Colin Loader, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl and K. H. Wolff (1971) From Karl Mannheim, edited with an introduction by Kurt H. Wolff, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, William Leon (ed.) (1997) Sartre’s Life, Times, and ‘Vision du Monde’, New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George Herbert (1967 [1934]) Mind, Self, and Society, edited and with an introduction by Charles W. Morris, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, Sarah Katherine (2010) Conservative Intellectuals and Richard Nixon: Rethinking the Rise of the Right, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesny, Anne (1998) The Appropriation of Social Science Knowledge by ‘Lay People’: The Development of a Lay Sociological Imagination? PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Andrew John (2003) ‘Pierre Bourdieu and the Perils of Allodoxia: Nationalism, Globalism and the Geopolitics of Intellectual Exchange’, Cultural Studies 17(3/4): 553–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Nicola (1999) In the Shadow of the State: Intellectuals and the Quest for National Identity in Twentieth-Century Spanish America, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Andrew (2002) Re-Imagining Cultural Studies: The Promise of Cultural Materialism, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Andrew (ed.) (2010) Tenses of Imagination: Raymond Williams on Science Fiction, Utopia and Dystopia, Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, John (2002) ‘Can Social Systems be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s Social Theory’, The Sociological Review 50(2): 278–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, Barbara A. (2007) Intellectuals and the Public Good: Creativity and Civil Courage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, Raj P. (ed.) (1987) The Mythmakers. Intellectuals and the Intelligentsia in Perspective, New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, Christina and Judith de Guzman (2011) ‘Intergroup Positioning in the Political Sphere: Contesting the Social Meaning of a Peace Agreement’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41(1): 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Marcus and Patrick Baert (2015) Conflict in the Academy. A Study in the Sociology of Intellectuals, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Roy (2005) ‘Cognitive Habitus and Collective Intelligence: Concepts for the Explanation of Inequality of Educational Opportunity’, Journal of Education Policy 20(1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassehi, Armin and Gerd Nollmann (eds.) (2004a) Bourdieu und Luhmann. Ein Theorievergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassehi, Armin and Gerd Nollmann (2004b) ‘Einleitung. Wozu ein Theorievergleich?’, in Armin Nassehi and Gerd Nollmann (eds.) Bourdieu und Luhmann. Ein Theorievergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, Nicholas (1995) Being Digital, London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nollmann, Gerd (2004) ‘Luhmann, Bourdieu und die Soziologie des Sinnverstehens. Zur Theorie und Empirie sozial geregelten Verstehens’, in Armin Nassehi and Gerd Nollmann (eds.) Bourdieu und Luhmann. Ein Theorievergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 118–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novack, George Edward (1966) Existentialism versus Marxism: Conflicting Views on Humanism, Delacorte Press: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Patrick (1977) The Saviours. An Intellectual History of the Left in Australia, Richmond, VIC: Drummond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odajnyk, Walter (1965) Marxism and Existentialism, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, Pascale and Jean-François Sirinelli (1992) Les intellectuels en France. De l’affaire Dreyfus à nos jours, Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osamu, Nishitani (2002) ‘Repenser la « fin de l’Histoire » – La Modernité et l’Histoire’, in Henri Meschonnic and Shiguehiko Hasumi (eds.) La modernité après le post-moderne, Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose, pp. 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbeck, Lisa and Nancy Nersessian (2010) ‘Forms of Positioning in Interdisciplinary Science Practice and their Epistemic Effects’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(2): 136–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, James M. (2000 [1981]) ‘Culture as a Fundamental Dimension of Experience: A Discussion of Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Human Habitus’, in Derek Robbins (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu. Volume I, London: Sage, pp. 302–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1978) Action Theory and the Human Condition, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott (1991) The Early Essays, edited and with an introduction by Charles Camic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passeron, Jean-Claude (2000 [1986]) ‘Theories of Socio-Cultural Reproduction’, in Derek Robbins (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu. Volume I, London: Sage, pp. 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, Andreas L. (2001) ‘International Law After Postmodernism: Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law?’, Leiden Journal of International Law 14(4): 727–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecourt, Juan (2007) ‘El intelectual y el campo cultural. Una variación sobre Bourdieu’, Revista Internacional de Sociología 65(47): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecourt, Juan (2008) Los intelectuales y la transición política. Un estudio del campo de las revistas políticas en España, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, Dick (1995) ‘Knowledge, Politics and Anti-Politics: Toward a Critical Appraisal of Bourdieu’s Concept of Intellectual Autonomy’, Theory and Society 24(1): 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picò, Josep and Juan Pecourt (2013) Los intelectuales nunca mueren. Una aproximación socio-histórica (1900–2000), Barcelona: RBA Libros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Louis (1991) ‘La doxa intellectuelle’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 90: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (1985) Virtue, Commerce, and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. (2003 [2001]) Public Intellectuals. A Study of Decline, Revised Edition, with a new preface and epilogue, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiniou, Yvon (1996) ‘Des classes à l’idéologie : déterminisme, matérialisme et émancipation chez P. Bourdieu’, Actuel Marx 20, Deuxième Semestre: 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinbach, Anson (1997) In the Shadow of Catastrophe: German Intellectuals between Apocalypse and Enlightenment, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauche, Gerhard Albin (1970) Contemporary Philosophical Alternatives and the Crisis of Truth. A Critical Study of Positivism, Existentialism and Marxism, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Herbert (1949) Existentialism, Marxism, and Anarchism. Chains of Freedom, London: Freedom Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmling, Gunter Werner (1975) The Sociology of Karl Mannheim. With a Bibliographical Guide to the Sociology of Knowledge, Ideological Analysis, and Social Planning, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, Helmut Harald (1982) Der Intellektuelle und die Politik: Beiträge zur politisch-literarischen Intellektualität von Schiller bis Handke, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, Philip (ed.) (1969) On Intellectuals: Theoretical Studies, Case Studies, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, Al and Jack Trout (2001 [1981]) Positioning. The Battle for Your Mind, 20th Anniversary Edition, New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, Brian (1993) ‘Heteronomy and Autonomy in Bourdieu’s Les Règles de l’Art’, French Cultural Studies 4(3): 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, Fritz (2000 [1990]) ‘The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge’, in Derek Robbins (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu. Volume III, London: Sage, pp. 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Derek (2000) Bourdieu and Culture, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Derek (2010) ‘Review Essay: The Foundations of Social Theoretical Discourse. Simon Susen, The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press, 2007’, Journal of Classical Sociology 10(1): 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Derek (2013) ‘Response to Simon Susen’s “Bourdieusian Reflections on Language: Unavoidable Conditions of the Real Speech Situation”’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1982) Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1991a) Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1991b) Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (1998) Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard (2009 [1979]) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 30th-Anniversary Edition, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Hartmut (2016) Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung, Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, Diane (1993) ‘Publish or Perish. The épuration of French Intellectuals’, Journal of European Studies 3(1): 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnel, Pille, Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Piret Viires, and Marin Laak (eds.) (2013) The Digital Turn: User’s Practices and Cultural Transformations, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, Nicolaas A. (2006) Alexander von Humboldt. A Metabiography, Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saake, Irmhild (2004) ‘Theorien der Empirie. Zur Spiegelbildlichkeit der Bourdieuschen Theorie der Praxis and der Luhmannschen Systemtheorie’, in Armin Nassehi and Gerd Nollmann (eds.) Bourdieu und Luhmann. Ein Theorievergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabour, M’hammed (2001) The Ontology and Status of Intellectuals in Arab Academia and Society, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri, Ahmad (1992) Max Weber’s Sociology of Intellectuals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. (1994) Representations of the Intellectual. The 1993 Reith Lectures, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, J. H. M. (1987) Renaissance and Revolt: Essays in the Intellectual and Social History of Early Modern France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvan, Jacques L. (1967) The Scandalous Ghost. Sartre’s Existentialism as Related to Vitalism, Humanism, Mysticism, Marxism, Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanos, Sandrine (2013) The Aesthetics of Hate: Far-Right Intellectuals, Antisemitism, and Gender in 1930s France, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (1943) L’être et le néant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (1946) L’existentialisme est un humanisme, Paris: Nagel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (2003 [1958/1943]) Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, trans. Hazel E. Barnes, introduction by Mary Warnock, with a new preface by Richard Eyre, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (2007 [1946]) Existentialism and Humanism, New Edition, translation and introduction by Philip Mairet, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul (2008 [1974/1972]) Between Existentialism and Marxism, trans. John Matthews, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul, Paul Auster, and Lydia Davis (1978 [1977/1976]) Sartre in the Seventies. Interviews and Essays, trans. Paul Auster and Lynda Davis, London: Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de (1978 [1916]) Course in General Linguistics, trans. Wade Baskin, Revised Edition, London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de (1995 [1916]) Cours de linguistique générale, Paris: Payot & Rivages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuch, Erwin K. (1974) Kulturintelligenz als Machtfaktor? Intellektuelle zwischen Geist und Politik, Zürich: Fromm Druckhaus A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidle, Robert (2010) ‘Positioning Theory and Terrorist Networks’, Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(1): 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwengel, Hermann (2003) ‘Epilog. Der Eingriff des Intellektuellen’, in Boike Rehbein, Gernot Saalmann, and Hermann Schwengel (eds.) Pierre Bourdieus Theorie des Sozialen: Probleme und Perspektiven, Konstanz: UVK, pp. 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Mark J. (2009 [2004]) Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, Steven (1994) ‘The End of Sociological Theory’, in Steven Seidman (ed.) The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonds, A. P. (1978) Karl Mannheim’s Sociology of Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintomer, Yves (2005) ‘Intellektuelle Kritik zwischen Korporatismus des Universellen und Öffentlichkeit’, in Catherine Colliot-Thélène, Etienne François, and Gunter Gebauer (eds.) Pierre Bourdieu: Deutsch-französische Perspektiven, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintomer, Yves (2011) ‘Intellectual Critique and the Public Sphere: Between the Corporatism of the Universal and the Realpolitik of Reason’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London: Anthem Press, pp. 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirinelli, Jean-François (1988) Génération intellectuelle. Khâgneux et normaliens dans l’entre-deux-guerres, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin (1969) ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory 8(1): 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin (1978) The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 volumes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Bradley, Nicci (2010) ‘The Positioning Diamond. A Trans-Disciplinary Framework for Discourse Analysis’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(1): 79–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, Helen (ed.) (2002) The Public Intellectual, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, Thomas (2009) Intellectuals and Society, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotts, Frederic (2008) The Shameful Peace. How French Artists and Intellectuals Survived the Nazi Occupation, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Nick (1995) Culture, Ideology and Socialism: Raymond Williams and E.P. Thompson, Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2007) The Foundations of the Social: Between Critical Theory and Reflexive Sociology, Oxford: Bardwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2008a) ‘Poder y anti-poder (I-III)’, Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural 10(1): 49–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2008b) ‘Poder y anti-poder (IV-V)’, Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural 10(2): 133–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2009) ‘Between Emancipation and Domination: Habermasian Reflections on the Empowerment and Disempowerment of the Human Subject’, Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy 20: 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2010) ‘Remarks on the Concept of Critique in Habermasian Thought’, Journal of Global Ethics 6(2): 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2011a) ‘Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie or kritische Gesellschaftspraxis? Robin Celikates, Kritik als soziale Praxis. Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie (Frankfurt am Main, Campus Verlag, 2009)’, Archives Européennes de Sociologie / European Journal of Sociology 52(3): 447–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2011b) ‘Bourdieu and Adorno on the Transformation of Culture in Modern Society: Towards a Critical Theory of Cultural Production’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London: Anthem Press, pp. 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2011c) ‘Afterword: Concluding Reflections on the Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London: Anthem Press, pp. 367–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2011d) ‘Critical Notes on Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere’, Sociological Analysis 5(1): 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2011e) ‘Epistemological Tensions in Bourdieu’s Conception of Social Science’, Theory of Science 33(1): 43–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2012a) ‘“Open Marxism” against and beyond the “Great Enclosure”? Reflections on How (Not) to Crack Capitalism’, Journal of Classical Sociology 12(2): 281–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2012b) ‘Une sociologie pragmatique de la critique est-elle possible? Quelques réflexions sur De la critique de Luc Boltanski’, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 110(4): 685–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2013a) ‘Comments on Patrick Baert and Filipe Carreira da Silva’s Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond—Towards a “Hermeneutics-Inspired Pragmatism”?’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 14(1): 80–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2013b) ‘Introduction: Bourdieu and Language’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2013c) ‘Bourdieusian Reflections on Language: Unavoidable Conditions of the Real Speech Situation’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 199–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2013d) ‘A Reply to My Critics: The Critical Spirit of Bourdieusian Language’, Social Epistemology 27(3–4): 323–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2014a) ‘15 Theses on Power’, Philosophy and Society 25(3): 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2014b) ‘The Place of Space in Social and Cultural Theory’, in Anthony Elliott (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Social and Cultural Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2014c) ‘Reflections on Ideology: Lessons from Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski’, Thesis Eleven 124(1): 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2014 [2012]) ‘Is There Such a Thing as a “Pragmatic Sociology of Critique”? Reflections on Luc Boltanski’s On Critique’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, trans. Simon Susen, London: Anthem Press, pp. 173–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2014 [2015]) ‘Towards a Dialogue Between Pierre Bourdieu’s “Critical Sociology” and Luc Boltanski’s “Pragmatic Sociology of Critique”’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’, trans. Simon Susen, London: Anthem Press, pp. 313–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2015a) The ‘Postmodern Turn’ in the Social Sciences, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2015b) ‘Emancipation’, in Michael T. Gibbons, Diana Coole, Elisabeth Ellis, and Kennan Ferguson (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, Vol. 3, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1024–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2015c) ‘Une réconciliation entre Pierre Bourdieu et Luc Boltanski est-elle possible ? Pour un dialogue entre la sociologie critique et la sociologie pragmatique de la critique’, in Bruno Frère (ed.) Le tournant de la théorie critique, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, pp. 151–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2016a) Pierre Bourdieu et la distinction sociale. Un essai philosophique, Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2016b) ‘Towards a Critical Sociology of Dominant Ideologies: An Unexpected Reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski’, Cultural Sociology 10(2): 195–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2016c) ‘Further Reflections on the “Postmodern Turn” in the Social Sciences: A Reply to William Outhwaite’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 29(4): 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2016d) ‘Scattered Remarks on the Concept of Engagement: A Socio-Philosophical Approach’, Philosophy and Society 27(2): 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2016e) ‘Reconstructing the Self: A Goffmanian Perspective’, in Harry F. Dahms and Eric R. Lybeck (eds.) Reconstructing Social Theory, History and Practice, Book Series: Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 35, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 111–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2017a) ‘Hermeneutic Bourdieu’, in Lisa Adkins, Caragh Brosnan, and Steven Threadgold (eds.) Bourdieusian Prospects, London: Routledge, pp. 132–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2017b) ‘No Exit from Brexit?’, in William Outhwaite (ed.) Brexit: Sociological Responses, London: Anthem Press, pp. 153–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2017c) ‘Between Crisis and Critique: The Fragile Foundations of Social Life à la Rodrigo Cordero’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 18(1): 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2017d) ‘Following the Footprints of the “Postmodern Turn”: A Reply to Gregor McLennan’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 4(1): 104–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon (2017e) ‘Remarks on the Nature of Justification: A Socio-Pragmatic Perspective’, in Charlotte Cloutier, Jean-Pascal Gond, and Bernard Leca (eds.) Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations: Contributions from French Pragmatist Sociology, Book Series: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 52, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 349–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, Simon and Bryan S. Turner (2011) ‘Introduction: Preliminary Reflections on the Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu’, in Simon Susen and Bryan S. Turner (eds.) The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London: Anthem Press, pp. xiii–xxix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, David (1997) Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, David (2003) ‘From Critical Sociology to Public Intellectual: Pierre Bourdieu and Politics’, Theory and Society 32(5/6): 791–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, David (2013) Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals. The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1995) ‘Suivre une règle’, Critique LI(579–580): 554–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen, Peter (ed.) (2013) New Public Spheres: Recontextualizing the Intellectual, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kenneth and Margaret A. Thompson (1984) Sartre. His Life and Works, New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, Alberto (2010) Fanaticism. On the Uses of an Idea, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traverso, Enzo (1999) ‘The Blindness of the Intellectuals: Historicizing Sartre’s “Anti-Semite and Jew”’, October 87: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredell, Nicolas (1990) Uncancelled Challenge: The Work of Raymond Williams, Nottingham: Paupers’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven, Adrian and Andrew N. Leak (eds.) (2005) Sartre Today. A Centenary Celebration, New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Langenhove, Luc and Rom Harré (1993) ‘Positioning in Scientific Discourse’, in Rom Harré (ed.) Anglo-Ukrainian Studies in the Analysis of Scientific Discourse: Reason and Rhetoric, Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, Charles R. (1999) ‘Determinism and the Recovery of Human Agency: The Embodying of Persons’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29(4): 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viskovatoff, Alex (1999) ‘Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29(4): 481–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelgesang, Sandy (1974) The Long Dark Night of the Soul. The American Intellectual Left and the Vietnam War, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Hans-Josef (2003) ‘Kultur – Sozialität – Subjektivität: konstitutionstheoretische Defizite im Werk Pierre Bourdieus’, in Boike Rehbein, Gernot Saalmann, and Hermann Schwengel (eds.) Pierre Bourdieus Theorie des Sozialen: Probleme und Perspektiven, Konstanz: UVK, pp. 203–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera, Wim (2013) The Digital Turn: How the Internet Transforms our Existence, Bloomington, Ind.: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiechens, Peter (2002) ‘Diskursive Gewalt. Zur Bourdieu-Derrida-Kontroverse über Heidegger’, in Uwe H. Bittlingmayer, Rolf Eickelpasch, Rolf Kastner, and Claudia Rademacher (eds.) Theorie als Kampf? Zur Politischen Soziologie Pierre Bourdieus, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiehn, Erhard Roij (1971) Intellektuelle in Politik und Gesellschaft, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, James D. (1981) The Intellectual Resistance in Europe, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1958) Culture and Society: 1780–1950, London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1961) The Long Revolution, London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1977) Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1980) Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1981) Culture, London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1988 [1976]) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Revised and Expanded Edition, London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winock, Michel (1997) Le siècle des intellectuels, Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, Harvey (1960) The American Historian. A Social-Intellectual History of the Writing of the American Past, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldring, H. E. S. (1987) Karl Mannheim: The Development of his Thought. Philosophy, Sociology and Social Ethics. With a Detailed Biography, Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Shanyang (2005) ‘The Digital Self: Through the Looking Glass of Telecopresent Others’, Symbolic Interaction 28(3): 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement:

I am indebted to David Lehmann for providing me with helpful comments on a draft version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, City, University of London, London, UK

    Simon Susen

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Patrick Baert

Authors
  1. Simon Susen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick Baert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Susen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Susen, S., Baert, P. (2017). Reflections on Patrick Baert’s The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual . In: The Sociology of Intellectuals. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61210-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61210-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61209-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61210-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation