Abstract
This chapter engages with the regimes that assemble the European Union’s flagship education and training program Erasmus Mundus. The analysis focuses on “Europe,” “dialogue and understanding,” and “third” as regimes of global educational policies and technologies of transnational governance. The chapter is a manifestación, a critical expression (not a critique) against these regimes. Erasmus Mundus is an educational program that aims to promote dialogue, understanding, and cooperation with “third countries.” The analysis zooms into a specific master’s program to see how the authority of the regimes is implicated in delimiting how it is possible to act in and upon the world through disciplining inquiry. Central to Erasmus Mundus is mobility (as a desirable construct) of the Erasmus Mundus student. At a crucial time on matters of migration (of the undesirables) in Europe, the chapter draws connections to the perversion and perversibility of the hospitality predicated on the positive aspirations of horizontal policies written in programs such as Erasmus Mundus. The larger aspiration of the chapter is to raise questions that are suggestive cues for generating ideas that should refuse to receive and dare invent educational dynamics that disinvent educational regimes such as the ones addressed in the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
2016 Annual Work Program for the Implementation of “Erasmus+. (2005). The Union Programme for Education, training, youth and sport.
Barad, K. (2012). Interview with Karen Barad. In R. Dolphijn & I. van der Tuin (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographies (pp. 48–71). Ann Arbor: MPublishing.
Bennett, T. (1995). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. New York: Routledge.
Beukel, E. (2001). Educational policy: Institutionalization and multi-level governance. In S. Andersen & K. Eliassen (Eds.), Making policy in Europe (2nd ed., pp. 124–139). London: SAGE Publications Ltd..
Bodycott, P. (2009). Choosing higher education study abroad destination: What Chinese parents and students rate as important. Journal of Research in International Education, 8(3), 349–373.
Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Calabrese, A. (2012). Master in strategic project management (European), a worldwide experience (pp. 488–497). Presented at the 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete, Greece.
Carlsson, B., Osborn, G., &Hjelseth, A. (2010). Guest editorial: Erasmus Mundus and education: The leisure, entertainment and governance initiative. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 8(1), 1–6.
Chícharo, L. (2012). Erasmus mundus master course in ecohydrology-an opportunity for global water education challenges. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 12(4), 269–270.
Daston, L. J., & Galison, P. (2010). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Decision No 1298/2008/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing the Erasmus Mundus 2009–2013 action program. (2008).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1993). Aporias. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J. (2000). Of hospitality (1st ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Didi-Huberman, G. (2006). L’image brûle. InPenser par les images: autour des travaux de Georges Didi-Huberman (pp. 11–52). Nantes: Cécile Defaut.
Erasmus: Changing lives opening minds for 25 years. (2011). Publications Office of the European Union.
Erasmus: I am one of the million who did it! (2010). Publications Office of the European Union.
Erasmus Mundus 2009–2013: Program guide. (2010). Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus_mundus/programme/documents/2011/em_programmeguide_1612_en.pdf
Gilbert, J. (2014). Sexuality in school: The limits of education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Greenblatt, S. (1992). Marvelous possessions: The wonder of the new world (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hacking, I. (2006). Kinds of people: Moving targets. Presented at the Tenth British Academy Lecture, London.
Hale, C. R. (2006). Más que un indio. More than an Indian: Racial ambivalence and neoliberal multiculturalism in Guatemala. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Haraway. (2003). The Haraway reader (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (2008, October). Does European culture exist? Prague. Retrieved from http://www.vize.cz/download/laureat-Julia-Kristeva-en-speech.pdf
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. http://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
Latour, B. (2005). What is the style of matters of concern? Assen: Uitgeverij Van Gorcum.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2006). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ranciere, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum International Publishing.
Terry, L. S. (2007). The bologna process and its implications for U.S. legal education. Journal of Legal Education, 57(2), 237–252.
Thiriet, J.-M., Robert, M., João Martins, M., & Bounnaud, O. (2006). Evolution of master degree in Europe: An overview of the European programme available in electrical and information engineering (pp. 347–352). Presented at the 17th Annual Conference on Innovation in Education for Electrical and Information Engineering EA.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K.W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1). Retrieved from http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/download/18630
Witcomb, A. (2013). Re-imagining the museum: Beyond the mausoleum. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
López López, L.(. (2018). A Manifestación to Disinvent Mundus’ Authoritarian Regimes and the Categorical Imperative of Hospitality. In: Hultqvist, E., Lindblad, S., Popkewitz, T. (eds) Critical Analyses of Educational Reforms in an Era of Transnational Governance. Educational Governance Research, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61971-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61971-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61969-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61971-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)