Skip to main content

Fetal Skull Segmentation in 3D Ultrasound via Structured Geodesic Random Forest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fetal, Infant and Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis (OMIA 2017, FIFI 2017)

Abstract

Ultrasound is the primary imaging method for prenatal screening and diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Thanks to its non-invasive and non-ionizing properties, ultrasound allows quick, safe and detailed evaluation of the unborn baby, including the estimation of the gestational age, brain and cranium development. However, the accuracy of traditional 2D fetal biometrics is dependent on operator expertise and subjectivity in 2D plane finding and manual marking. 3D ultrasound has the potential to reduce the operator dependence. In this paper, we propose a new random forest-based segmentation framework for fetal 3D ultrasound volumes, able to efficiently integrate semantic and structural information in the classification process. We introduce a new semantic features space able to encode spatial context via generalized geodesic distance transform. Unlike alternative auto-context approaches, this new set of features is efficiently integrated into the same forest using contextual trees. Finally, we use a new structured labels space as alternative to the traditional atomic class labels, able to capture morphological variability of the target organ. Here, we show the potential of this new general framework segmenting the skull in 3D fetal ultrasound volumes, significantly outperforming alternative random forest-based approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dikkeboom, C.M., et al.: The role of three-dimensional ultrasound in visualizing the fetal cranial sutures and fontanels during the second half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 24, 412–416 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noble, J.A., Boukerroui, D.: Ultrasound image segmentation: A survey. IEEE Trans Med. Imag. 25(8), 987–1010 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: Guidelines for performing the basic examination and the fetal neurosonogram. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 29, 109–116(2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu, W., et al.: Automated fetal head detection and measurement in ultrasound images by iterative randomized hough transform. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31(7), 929–936 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen, Y., et al.: Fetal skull analysis in ultrasound images based on iterative randomized Hough transform. SPIE 7265 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Namburete, A.I.L., Noble, J.A.: Fetal cranial segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using shape properties of pixel clusters (2013). ISBI: 720–723

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foi, A., et al.: Difference of Gaussians revolved along elliptical paths for ultrasound fetal head segmentation. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 38, 774–784 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H.C., et al.: Registration-based segmentation of three-dimensional ultrasound images for quantitative measurement of fetal craniofacial structure. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38(5), 811–823 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontschieder, P., et al.: Structured labels in random forests for semantic labelling and object detection. TPAMI 36(10), 2104–2116 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dollar, P., Zitnick, C.: Structured forests for fast edge detection. In: Proceedings of the ICCV, pp. 1841–1848 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kontschieder, P., et al.: GeoF: Geodesic forests for learning coupled predictors. In: Proceedings of the CVPR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oktay, O., et al.: Stratified decision forests for accurate anatomical landmark localization in cardiac images. TMI 36(1), 332–342 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toivanen, P.J.: New geodesic distance transforms for gray-scale images. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 17, 437–450 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Butt, K., Lim, K.: Determination of Gestational Age by Ultrasound. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines, 303 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions of the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, under REA grant agreement 706372.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan J. Cerrolaza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cerrolaza, J.J. et al. (2017). Fetal Skull Segmentation in 3D Ultrasound via Structured Geodesic Random Forest. In: Cardoso, M., et al. Fetal, Infant and Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis. OMIA FIFI 2017 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67561-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67561-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67560-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67561-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics