Skip to main content

Conceptualizing Democracy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

Synonyms

Popular rule; Representative government

Definition

Democracy is a synthesis of the Greek words demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning to rule – that is, “rule by the people.” The more precise definition of the term has always been disputed; democracy has even been highlighted as the essentially contested concept par excellence. It is therefore necessary to distinguish between different definitions of democracy. One way of doing so is by creating a typology that includes multiple types of democracy. Such a systematic conceptual distinction paves the way for assessing the relationship between democracy and other phenomena such as equality, economic growth, peace, and famine.

Description

The desire for basic material goods (“a good coat, a good roof, and a good dinner”) is what makes the masses fight for democracy according to Acemoglu and Robinson (2006, p. 20). However, whether democracy does indeed facilitate a more equal distribution of goods in society is disputed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, B., & Samuels, D. (2014). Inequality and democratization: An elite-competition approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives. World Politics, 49, 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Altman, Bernhard, M., Fish, S., Hicken, A., Kroenig, M., Lindberg, S., McMann, K., Paxton, P., Semetko, H., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., & Teorell, J. (2012). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2005). Democracy: A history. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S. E. (1962). The man on horseback. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness prospers in democracy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W. T., & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics, 57, 323–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H. (1991). The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H. (2010). The mixed constitution versus the separation of powers: Monarchical and aristocratic aspects of modern emocracy. History of Political Thought, 31, 509–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gleditsch, N. P., & Gates, S. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? American Political Science Review, 95, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, C. H. (2012). Democracy and economic growth: A review of arguments and results. International Area Studies Review, 15, 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., & Snyder, J. (2005). Electing to fight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2010). Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2018). The advantages of a thin view. In C. May & A. Winchester (Eds.), Handbook on the rule of law (pp. 21–33). Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). Requisites of democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, G. (2016). What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy. Democratization, 23, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A., Christophersen, J., & Kvalo, K. (1956). Democracy, ideology and objectivity. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (2010). Democracy, agency, and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87, 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the english language. In G. Orwell (Ed.), Inside the whale and other essays (pp. 143–157). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2007). Democracy, equality, and redistribution. In R. Bourke & R. Geuss (Eds.), Political judgment (pp. 281–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P., & Henderson, E. A. (2002). Democracy, threats and political repression in developing countries. Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, O. (2009). The merits of democracy in famine protection. European Journal of Development, 21, 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. (1993). Can a democratic peace be built?. International Interactions, 18(3), 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. (2000). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-cold war world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1974 [1942]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirowy, L., & Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative and International Development, 25, 126–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingsten, H. (1965 [1945]). The problem of democracy. Totowa: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jørgen Møller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Møller, J., Skaaning, SE. (2022). Conceptualizing Democracy. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3872-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3872-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69909-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69909-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics