Definitions
Process and product innovation are defined as an organizational ability to discover and translate creative approaches to solve multiple organizational problems. The process and product innovation contribute to the supply of economic, social, and environmental benefits, thus ensuring sustainable environmental growth. It helps companies to achieve greater profits, reduce environmental burden, and use a material that can be more resource-efficient. Process and product innovation have become ubiquitous and part of everyday life. Sustainable process and product innovation are contemplated as an essential means for addressing infrastructure resilience for sustainability challenges. Although the perspective is huge, the governance and capability structure eventually dictate what innovation is likely to be developed.
Introduction
In late 2010 and early 2015, United Nation announced 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets on the idea of eight-millennium development...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adejumo OO (2019) Environmental quality vs economic growth in a developing economy: complements or conflicts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–17
Adejumo AV, Adejumo OO (2014) Prospects for achieving sustainable development through the millennium development goals in Nigeria. Eur J Sustain Dev 3:33–46. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n1p33
Aguirre-Bastos C, Weber MK (2017) Foresight for shaping national innovation systems in developing economies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 128:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.025
Arvanitis S, Lokshin B, Mohnen P, Wörter M (2015) Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: a comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. Rev Ind Organ 46:359–382
Aschemann-Witzel J, De Hooge IE, Rohm H et al (2017) Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste – a multiple case study. J Clean Prod 155:33–45
Awan U, Raza MA (2010) Green consumer behavior: empirical study of Swedish consumer behavior Department of Management Sciences. Recent Res Econ 89–104. ISBN: 978-1-61804-061-9. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2011/Montreux/ICICIC/ICICIC-14.pdf
Awan U, Muneer G, Abbas W (2013) Organizational collaborative culture as a source of managing innovation. World Appl Sci J 24:582–587. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.05.1085
Awan U, Sroufe R, Kraslawski A (2019) Creativity enables sustainable development: supplier engagement as a boundary condition for the positive effect on green innovation. J Clean Prod 226:172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.308
Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J (2020) Progress from blue to the green world : multilevel governance for pollution prevention planning and sustainability. In: Hussain CM (ed) Handbook of environmental materials management. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland, pp 1–22
Bailey KD (1973) Constructing monothetic and polythetic typologies by the heuristic method. Sociol Q 14:291–308
Barton DL, Sensiper S (1998) The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. Calif Manage Rev 40:112–131
Boyd E, James RA, Jones RG et al (2017) A typology of loss and damage perspectives. Nat Clim Chang 7:723–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3389
Bucherer E, Uckelmann D (2011) Business models for the internet of things. In: Architecting the internet of things. Springer-Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 253–277
Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2006) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, USA
De Medeiros JF, Ribeiro JLD, Cortimiglia MN (2014) Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 65:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.035
Delbridge R, Fiss PC (2013) Editors’ comments: styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Acad Manag Rev 38:325–331. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0085
Doty DH, Glick WH (1994) Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling. Acad Manag Rev 19:230–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1994.9410210748
Drath R, Horch A (2014) Industrie 4.0: hit or hype? [Industry forum]. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 8:56–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2014.2312079
Driessen PH, Hillebrand B (2013) Integrating multiple stakeholder issues in new product development: an exploration. J Prod Innov Manag 30:364–379
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868
Flor ML, Cooper SY, Oltra MJ (2017) External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. Eur Manag J 36:183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.003
Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M (2013) Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur Gener Comput Syst 29:1645–1660
Harrington B, Ladge J (2009) Present dynamics and future directions for organizations. Organ Dyn 38:148–157
Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO et al (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:413–432
Howells J, Edler J (2011) Structural innovations:t owards a unified perspective? Sci Public Policy 38:157–167. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12924093660598
Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56:137–159
Kirchherr J, Bour R, Kostense-Smit E et al (2017) Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecol Econ 150:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
León-Bravo V, Caniato F, Caridi M, Johnsen T (2017) Collaboration for sustainability in the food supply chain: a multi-stage study in Italy. Sustainability 9:1253
Lumb D (2015) How the internet of things is changing work. Accessed on 10 July 2010 from http://www.fusbp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/THEFUTURE-OF-WORK.pdf
Martin BR, Johnston R (1999) Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technol Forecast Soc Change 60:37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00022-5
McDonald P (2011) It’s time for management version 2.0: six forces redefining the future of modern management. Futures 43:797–808
Mintzberg H (1993) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs
Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR (2009) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harv Bus Rev 87:56–64
Ostrom AL, Parasuraman A, Bowen DE et al (2015) Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. J Serv Res 18:127–159
Pandit D, Joshi MP, Sahay A, Gupta RK (2018) Disruptive innovation and dynamic capabilities in emerging economies: evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Technol Forecast Soc Change 129:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.035
Pereira AC, Romero F (2017) A review of the meanings and the implications of the industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf 13:1206–1214
Porter ME (2011) Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster
Preston DS, Chen DQ, Swink M, Meade L (2017) Generating supplier benefits through buyer-enabled knowledge enrichment: a social capital perspective. Decis Sci 48:248–287
Reiche BS, Bird A, Mendenhall ME, Osland JS (2017) Contextualizing leadership: a typology of global leadership roles. J Int Bus Stud 48:552–572. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0030-3
Ritala P, Tidström A (2014) Untangling the value-creation and value-appropriation elements of coopetition strategy: a longitudinal analysis on the firm and relational levels. Scand J Manag 30:498–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2014.05.002
Schilke O (2014) Second-order dynamic capabilities: how do they matter? Acad Manag Perspect 28:368–380
Schroeder JE (2017) Corporate branding in perspective: a typology. Eur J Mark 51:1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2017-0450
Snow CC, Ketchen DJ (2014) Typology-driven theorizing: a response to delbridge and fiss. Acad Manag Rev 39:231–233. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0388
Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. WH Friedman Co, San Francisco, p 359
Teece DJ (1986) Profiling from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licencing and public policy. Res Policy 15:285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
Wang Q, Voss C, Zhao X, Wang Z (2015) Modes of service innovation: a typology. Ind Manag Data Syst 115:1358–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0067
Windeler A (2018) Reflexive innovation. In: Innovation society today. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 65–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Awan, U. (2020). Steering for Sustainable Development Goals: A Typology of Sustainable Innovation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_64-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_64-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71059-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71059-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences