Skip to main content

Introducing International Practice Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Practice Theory

Abstract

International relations scholars are increasingly interested in practice. Following a wider turn to practices in the social sciences, a broad movement of scholars is now engaged in practice-based study. In this introduction, we discuss what intrigues us about practice. International practice theory offers a genuine and novel perspective on politics and international relations, and promises to provide observers with a new lens through which to analyse the world. We show that four issue areas – the study of diplomacy, the production of insecurity, transnational governance, and state building and intervention – have been particularly important in developing the empirical research agenda of international practice theory. We also provide a brief overview of the seven core approaches discussed in the book. These approaches, ranging from Bourdieu’s praxeology to Boltanski’s pragmatic sociology, are the conceptual cornerstones of international practice theory. Finally, we introduce the notion of praxiography as the corresponding methodology for the study of international practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are aware that this acronym has attracted some criticism. Some might think that there is not enough substance to grant international practice theory an acronym , while others may point out that IPT is already reserved for international political theory. We find the first critique misleading; this book showcases how IPT has flourished. The latter concern is, of course, valid, but we consider that the discipline can cope with having the same acronym for two different intellectual fields.

Literature

  • Acuto, Michele, and Simon Curtis, eds. 2013. Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundation of International Relations. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Richard K. 1987. The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 12 (4): 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avant, Deborah, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? In Who Governs the Globe? ed. Deborah Avant, Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balzaq, Thiery, Tugba Basaran, Didier Bgio, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, and Christian Olson. 2010. Security Practices. In International Studies Encyclopedia Online, ed. Robert A. Denemark. Blackwell Publishing. http://www.isacompendium.com/. Accessed 16 Oct 2017.

  • ———. 2012. Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and Society 41 (5): 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Jacqueline, and William Walters. 2013. ‘Actor-Network Theory’ and International Relationality: Lost (and Found) in Translation. Introduction. International Political Sociology 3 (7): 332–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Globalized In-Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon. In Translation, Philosophy and the Colonial Difference: A Multilingual Series of Cultural Theory, ed. Naoki Sakai and Jon Solomon, 109–157. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Zistel, Susanne. 2014. Narrative Truths. On the Construction of the Past in Truth Commissions. In Transitional Justice Theories, ed. Susanne Buckley-Zistel, Teresa Koloma Beck, Christian Braun, and Corinna Mieth, 144–162. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, Christian. 2011. The Clash of Practice: Political Controversy and the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission. Evidence and Policy 7 (2), Special Issue on the Practice of Policymaking: 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Practice, Pirates and Coast Guards: The Grand Narrative of Somali Piracy. Third World Quarterly 34 (10): 1811–1827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Security as Practice. In Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, ed. Thierry Balzacq and Myriam Dunn Cavelty, 2nd ed., 126–135. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kevin E., Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle Merry. 2012a. Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review 46 (1): 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kevin, Angelina Fisher, Benedict Kingsbury, and Sally Engle Merry, eds. 2012b. Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, Richard. 2009. After the Event: Don DeLillo’s White Noise and September 11 Narratives. Review of International Studies 35 (4): 795–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1997. Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fougner, Tore. 2008. Neoliberal Governance of States: The Role of Competitiveness Indexing and Country Benchmarking. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (2): 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadinger, Frank. 2016. On Justification and Critique. Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations. International Political Sociology 10 (3): 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Julie. 2009. Learning to Learn and Building Communities of Practice: Non-governmental Organisations and Examples from Mine Action in Southeast Asia. Global Society 23 (3): 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 147–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrieder, Tine. 2016. Orders of Worth and the Moral Conceptions of Health in Global Politics. International Theory 8 (3): 390–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. UN Reform, Biopolitics, and Global Governmentality. International Theory 2 (1): 50–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koddenbrock, Kai. 2016. The Practice of Humanitarian Intervention. Aid Workers, Agencies and Institutions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Ronald. 2015a. How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall: Military Conflict, Politics, and the Cold War Consensus. International Organization 69 (4): 809–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Nils. 2011. In the Labyrinth of International Community: The Alliance of Civilizations Programme at the United Nations. Cooperation and Conflict 46 (2): 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger. 2014. Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue 45 (6): 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to the European and Beyond. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (1): 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navari, Cornelia. 2010. The Concept of Practice in the English School. European Journal of International Relations 17 (4): 611–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. 2002. Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. To Be a Diplomat. International Studies Perspectives 6 (1): 72–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Holger. 2015. Justification and Critique in the UN Security Council: The Veto as Legitimacy Test. Presented at the ISA Conference, New Orleans, February 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, Christian. 2015. Interventionism as Practice: On ‘Ordinary Transgressions’ and their Routinization. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 9 (4): 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Tony. 2012. Making Serious Measures: Numerical Indices, Peer Review, and Transnational Actor-Networks. Journal of International Relations and Development 15 (4): 532–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, Vincent. 2008. The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, Vincent, and Jérémie Cornut. 2015. Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, Peer. 2013. The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Banking on Power. How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others. In International Practices, ed. Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, 231–254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sending, Ole Jacob, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann, eds. 2015. Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William. 2002. The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael C. 2007. Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security: The Reconstruction of Security in the Post-Cold War Era. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bueger, C., Gadinger, F. (2018). Introducing International Practice Theory. In: International Practice Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics