Abstract
Gregor Mendel’s paper “Experiments on Plant Hybrids” (1866) has become a paradigmatic case in the historiography of the life sciences because production and reception of a “discovery” sharply fell apart, thus raising fundamental questions about the relationship between scientific achievement and “its” time. In this chapter, I am providing an overview of answers that have been given to these questions by various historians. In a first section, I cover commentators who have claimed that Mendel was “ahead” of his time, and that contemporaries failed to recognize his achievement. I then move on to scholars and scientists who argued against this position, claiming that Mendel was not anticipating twentieth-century genetics, but was in fact representative of an older research tradition. In a last step, I turn to the more recent cultural history of heredity according to which Mendel was embedded in a local culture that combined a variety of advanced and traditional strands of nineteenth-century life-sciences. Overall, I am arguing that one should not overestimate the coherence and dominance of presumed “paradigms”, “epistemes” or “styles” in biology.
Ihr Lettern, meines Forschens Sprossen ...
Gregor Mendel, 1830s
First line from a poem that Gregor Mendel sketched in the late 1830s during his time at the gymnasium of Opava (Troppau). It can be translated as “Oh letters, rungs of my research ...”; the poem celebrates Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of movable print. Quoted from Iltis (1924, 14)
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Mendel (1866, p. 3); Mendel (2016a, p. 3, s. 6). There exist several English translations of Mendel’s essay (Mendel 1901, 1902, 1966, 2016b). I am quoting from the latest critical edition and translation, citing page and sentence number. The phrase “long neglect” can be traced back to Glass (1953, p. 148).
- 3.
On references to Mendel’s paper before 1900, see Olby and Gautrey (1968). On its “rediscovery” in 1900, see Jahn (1958), Olby (1985, ch. 6), Rheinberger (1995), Stamhuis et al. (1999), Harwood (2000), and Simunek et al. (2011). Olby (1985, 219–234) provides English translations of some sources mentioning Mendel before 1900. On the history of Mendelian genetics, see Dietrich, this volume.
- 4.
Sapp (1990, p. 146), Orel and Hartl (1994, p. 445), and Olby (1997, sect. “Scientific Disciplines”). All three review articles are accessible online at MendelWeb (www.mendelweb.org), an internet resource created by Roger B. Blumberg in 1995, but not updated since 1997. It offers a wealth of other useful material, including the German original and Bateson’s 1902 translation of Mendel’s paper for download.
- 5.
- 6.
Vries (1900, 84–85).
- 7.
- 8.
Tschermak (1900, 235).
- 9.
Tschermak (1901, 54). In the second edition (1911), Tschermak changed his mind and presented Mendel much more in line with what we today would consider as conventional Mendelism.
- 10.
Ibid., 55.
- 11.
- 12.
Brannigan (1979, 450).
- 13.
The French Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser suggested that the “spontaneous philosophy of scientists” could provide an antidote to the tendency of philosophy “to speak about nothing but itself” (Macherey 2009, 19).
- 14.
Correns (1905); Nägeli’s responses to Mendel are lost.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
Fisher (1936, 137).
- 18.
Fisher (1936, 137).
- 19.
Bateson (1902). This was the first book-length critical study of Mendel’s paper, and a second revised edition appeared in 1909.
- 20.
Fisher (1936, 124). Whether Mendel, consciously or not, falsified “his data to produce results that were ‚too good to be true’ has been the subject of a fierce debate among statisticians, geneticists, and historians of science that continues to this day; see Franklin et al. (2008) for a collection of important contributions to this debate. The allegation of data manipulation was not new when Fisher wrote his article. Bateson’s main opponent, the biometrician Raphael Weldon (1860–1906), had actually raised it in 1902 already; see Radick (2015).
- 21.
On the Modern Synthesis, see Borello, this volume.
- 22.
Beer (1964).
- 23.
Glass (1953, 158).
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
Jacob (1970/1996, 202–9).
- 30.
Mendel (2016a, 38–47). This last section was also included in what became the most popular English edition of Mendel’s paper. It originally appeared as an appendix in Castle (1916, 281–321) and was then reprinted as an inconspicuous brochure by Harvard University Press until 1965. It is all the more mysterious why Zirkle (1951, 99), otherwise a very attentive scientist historian, claimed that “Mendel himself described none of the earlier research”.
- 31.
- 32.
See Jardine (2003) for critical reflections on the concept of “Whig history”.
- 33.
Olby (1985, xi–xiv).
- 34.
Olby (1979, 53–54).
- 35.
Kampourakis (2015).
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
Olby (1997), sect. IV, “Mendel and the Darwinians.”
- 39.
Jacob (1970/1996, 11).
- 40.
Mayr (1982, 127).
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
Bowler (1989, 7).
- 44.
- 45.
Sosna (1966, vii–xi). The conference proceedings are available from the Wellcome Library’s Digital Collections (URL https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18019900).
- 46.
Paleček (2016). Due to complex local developments in post-communist Brno, there are two Mendel museums now in Brno. The Mendelianum was moved to the Moravian Museum, while a new Mendel Museum sponsored by the Masaryk University was established in the monastery. Folia Mendeliana continues to appear (see http://www.mzm.cz/en/folia-mendeliana/), but its contents are unfortunately not yet available online.
- 47.
Orel (2005). “Rehabilitating” Mendel was not just an academic question: Kříženecký lost his university position in 1948 and even spent 18 months in jail in 1958 (Orel 1992). At around the same time, Orel lost his job as head of the poultry research unit at the Agricultural University in Brno (Paleček 2016).
- 48.
On Hessen, see Freudenthal and McLaughlin (2009).
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
Allen (2002).
- 52.
- 53.
- 54.
Matalová (1992, 118).
- 55.
- 56.
- 57.
Keller (2000).
- 58.
See, e.g., Jablonka and Lamb (2005).
- 59.
For an attempt at a synthetic overview, see Müller-Wille and Rheinberger (2012).
- 60.
- 61.
- 62.
Müller-Wille and Rheinberger (2007).
- 63.
- 64.
Lugt and Miramon (2008).
- 65.
Hopwood et al. (in press).
- 66.
- 67.
- 68.
- 69.
Radick (2016).
- 70.
Lévi-Strauss (1962/1966, 257).
- 71.
Collingwood (1994).
- 72.
Canguilhem (1966/2005).
- 73.
- 74.
- 75.
Jordanova (1995).
- 76.
See Arni (2015) for an interesting exception.
- 77.
- 78.
Smith (2006).
- 79.
References
Allen GE (1991) Essay review: history of agriculture and the study of heredity – a new horizon. J Hist Biol 24:529–536
Allen GE (2002) The changing image of biology in the twentieth century. In: Stamhuis IH, Koetsier T, De Pater C, Van Helden A (eds) The changing image of science. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 43–83
Arni C (2015) Traversing birth: continuity and contingency in research on development in nineteenth-century life and human sciences. Hist Philos Life Sci 37:50–67
Barahona A, Suarez-Díaz E, Rheinberger H-J (eds) (2010) The hereditary hourglass: genetics and epigenetics, 1868–2000. Preprint 392. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
Bateson W (1900–1901) Problems of heredity as a subject for horticultural investigation. J R Hortic Soc 25:54–61
Bateson W (1902) Mendel’s Principles of Heredity: A Defence. At the University Press, Cambridge
de Beer G (1964) Mendel, Darwin, and Fisher (1865-1965). Notes Rec R Soc Lond 19:192–226
Bennett JH (ed) (1965) Gregor Mendel. Experiments in plant hybridization. Mendel’s original paper in English translation with commentary and assessment by the late Sir Ronald Fisher. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
Bishop BE (1996) Mendel’s opposition to evolution and to Darwin. J Hered 87:205–213
Bowler PJ (1988) The non-Darwinian revolution: reinterpreting a historical myth. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Bowler PJ (1989) The Mendelian revolution: the emergence of hereditarian concepts in modern science and society. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Brannigan A (1979) The reification of Mendel. Soc Stud Sci 9:423–454
Burkhardt RW (1994) Ernst Mayr: biologist-historian. Biol Philos 9:359–371
Callender LA (1988) Gregor Mendel: an opponent of descent with modification. Hist Sci 26:41–75
Campbell M (1982) Mendel’s theory: its context and plausibility. Centaurus 26:38–69
Canguilhem G (2005) The object of the history of sciences. In: Gutting G (ed) Continental philosophy of science. Oxford, Blackwell, pp 198–207 (Originally published in French, 1966)
Carlson EA (1966) The gene: a critical history. Saunders, Philadelphia
Castle WE (1916) Genetics and eugenics: a textbook for students of biology and a reference book for animal and plant breeders. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Churchill F (1987) From heredity theory to ‘Vererbung’: the transmission problem, 1850–1915. Isis 78:337–364
Collingwood RG (1994) The idea of history, edited by van der Dussen J. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Correns C (1900) G. Mendels Regel über das Verhalten der Nachkommenschaft der Rassenbastarde. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18:158–168
Correns C (ed) (1905) Gregor Mendels Briefe an Carl Nägeli, 1866–1873. Ein Nachtrag zu den veröffentlichten Bastardierungsversuchen Mendels. Teubner, Leipzig
Dear P (1995) Cultural history of science: an overview with reflections. Sci Technol Hum Values 20:150–170
Delaporte F (ed) (1994) A vital rationalist. Selected writings from George Canguilhem. Zone Books, New York
Dröscher A (2014) Images of cell trees, cell lines, and cell fates: the legacy of Ernst Haeckel and August Weismann in stem cell research. Hist Philos Life Sci 36:157–186
Dröscher A (2015) Gregor Mendel, Franz Unger, Carl Nägeli and the magic of numbers. Hist Sci 54:492–508
Farley J (1982) Gametes and spores: ideas about sexual reproduction. 1750–1914. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Fisher RA (1936) Has Mendel’s work been rediscovered? Ann Sci 1:115–137
Foucault M (1971) Orders of discourse. Rupert S (trans). Soc Sc Inf 10:7–30. Originally published in French, 1970
Franklin A, Edwards AWF, Fairbanks DJ, Hartl DL (2008) Ending the Mendel-Fisher controversy. Univ. of Pittsburgh Pr., Pittsburgh
Franklin S (2013) Biological relatives – IVF, stem cells and the future of kinship. Duke University Press, Durham
Freudenthal G, McLaughlin P (eds) (2009) The social and economic roots of the scientific revolution. Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 278. Springer, Heidelberg
Gasking E (1967) Investigations into generation 1651–1828. Hutchinson, London
Gaudillière JP, Löwy I (eds) (2001) Heredity and infection: the history of disease transmission. Routledge, London
Gausemeier B (2014) Pedigrees of madness: the study of heredity in nineteenth and early twentieth century psychiatry. Hist Philos Life Sci 36:467–483
Gausemeier B, Müller-Wille S, Ramsden E (eds) (2013) Human heredity in the twentieth century. Pickering and Chattoo, London
Gayon J, Wunenburger J-J (eds) (1995) Le Paradigme de la filiation. L’Harmattan, Paris
Glass HB (1953) The long neglect of scientific discovery: Mendel’s laws of inheritance. In: Johns Hopkins History of Ideas Club (ed) Studies in intellectual history. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp 148–160
Gliboff S (1999) Gregor Mendel and the laws of evolution. Hist Sci 37:217–235
Harwood J (2000) The rediscovery of Mendelism in agricultural context: Erich von Tschermak as plant-breeder. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences – Series III – Sciences de La Vie 3232:1061–1067
Heimans J (1968) Ein Notizblatt aus dem Nachlass Gregor Mendels mit Analysen eines seiner Kreuzungsversuche. Folia Mendeliana 4:5–36
Heimans J (1970) A recently discovered note on hybridization in Mendel’s handwriting. Folia Mendeliana 5:13–24
Hodge J (1985) Darwin as a lifelong generation theorist. In: Kohn D (ed) The Darwinian heritage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 204–244
Hopwood N, Flemming R, Kassell L (in press) Reproduction: antiquity to the present day. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Iltis H (1924) Gregor Johann Mendel: Leben, Werk und Wirkung. Springer, Berlin
Iltis H (1966) Life of Mendel. Paul C, Paul E (trans). London, Allen & Unwin
Jablonka E, Lamb M (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
Jacob F (1996) The logic of life: a history of heredity. Spillman BE (trans). Princeton, Princeton University Press Originally published in French, 1970
Jahn I (1958) Zur Geschichte der Wiederentdeckung der Mendelschen Gesetze. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller Universität Jena, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe 7:2155–2127
Jardine N (2003) Whigs and stories: Herbert Butterfield and the historiography of science. Hist Sci 41(2003):125–140
Jordanova L (1995) Interrogating the concept of reproduction in the eighteenth century. In: Ginsburg FD, Rapp R (eds) Conceiving the new world order. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 369–386
Kampourakis K (2010) Mendel and the path to genetics: portraying science as a social process. Sci & Educ 22:293–324
Kampourakis K (2015) Myth 16. That Gregor Mendel was a lonely pioneer of genetics, being ahead of his time. In: Numbers RL, Kampourakis K (eds) Newton’s apple and other myths about science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–138
Keller EF (2000) The century of the gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Klein J, Klein N (2013) Solitude of a humble genius – Gregor Johann Mendel, Vol. 1: Formative years. Springer, Berlin
Kříženecký J (ed) (1965) Fundamenta Genetica: the revised edition of Mendel’s classical paper with a collection of 27 papers published during the rediscovery era. Moravian Museum, Brno
Kroeber AL (1917) The superorganic. Am Anthropol., New Series 19:163–213
Laubichler MD, Maienschein J (eds) (2007) From embryology to evo-devo: a history of developmental evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Lesky E (1951) Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Nr. 19. Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden
Lévi-Strauss C (1966) The savage mind. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. Originally published in French, 1962
Liu D (2016) Visions of life and matter: protoplasm, scientific microscopy, and the origins of molecular biology, 1839–1941. PhD thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison
López Beltrán C (1994) Forging heredity: from metaphor to cause, a reification story. Stud Hist Philos of Sci 25:211–235
López-Beltrán C (2004a) In the cradle of heredity: French physicians and L’Hérédité Naturelle in the early nineteenth century. J Hist Biol 37:39–72
López-Beltrán C (2004b) El sesgo hereditario: ámbitos históricos del concepto de herencia biológica. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
López-Beltrán C (2007) Hippocratic bodies, temperament and Castas in Spanish America (1570-1820). J Span Cult Stud 8:253–289
van der Lugt M (2004) Le ver, le démon et la vierge. Les théories médiévales de la génération extraordinaire. Belles Lettres, Paris
van der Lugt M, de Miramon C (2008) L’hérédité entre Moyen Age et époque moderne. SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, Florence
Macherey P (2009) Althusser and the concept of a spontaneous philosophy of scientists. Parrhesia 6:14–27
Matalová A (1992) Vítězslav Orel, chairman of the Mendelianum, retired. Folia Mendeliana 26–27 (1991–92): 118–119
Mayr E (1973) The recent historiography of genetics. J Hist Biol 6:125–154
Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E (1990) When is historiography Whiggish? J Hist Ideas 51:301–309
Mendel G (1866) Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines zu Brünn 4:3–47
Mendel G (1901) Experiments in plant hybridization, with an introductory note by W. Bateson, M.A., F.R.S. J R Hortic Soc 26 (1901, Part I):1–32
Mendel G (1902) Experiments in plant-hybridisation. In: Bateson W (ed) Mendel’s principles of heredity: a defence. At the University Press, Cambridge, pp 40–95
Mendel G (1966) “Experiments on plant hybrids,” In: Curt S and Sherwood ER (eds) The origin of genetics: a Mendel source book. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 1–48
Mendel G (2016a) Experiments on plant hybrids (1866). Translation and commentary by Staffan Müller-Wille and Kersten Hall. British Society for the History of Science Translation Series. URL http://www.bshs.org.uk/bshs-translations/mendel
Mendel G (2016b) “Experiments on plant hybrids,” Scott A, Daniel JF (trans). Genetics, 204:407–22
Merton RK (1996) On social structure and science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Müller-Wille S (2007) Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: from nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 38:796–806
Müller-Wille S (2011) Making sense of essentialism. Crit Q 53:61–67
Müller-Wille S, Brandt C (eds) (2016) Heredity explored: between public domain and experimental science, 1850–1930. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Müller-Wille S, Orel V (2007) From Linnaean species to Mendelian factors: elements of hybridism, 1751-1870. Ann Sci 64:171–215
Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J (eds) (2007) Heredity produced: At the crossroads of biology, politics and culture, 1500–1870. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J (2012) A cultural history of heredity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ogburn WF, Thomas D (1922) Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Polit Sci Q 37:83–98
Olby RC (1966) Origins of mendelism. Schocken Books, New York
Olby RC (1979) Mendel no Mendelian? Hist Sci 17:53–72
Olby RC (1985) Origins of Mendelism, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Olby R (1989) The dimensions of scientific controversy: the biometric-Mendelian debate. Br J Hist Sci 22:299–320
Olby RC (1993) Constitutional and hereditary disorders. In: Bynum WF, Porter R (eds) Companion encyclopedia of the history of medicine. Routledge, London, pp 412–437
Olby RC (1997) Mendel, mendelism and genetics. MendelWeb. URL http://www.mendelweb.org/MWolby.html. last accessed 2 Jan 2016
Olby R, Gautrey P (1968) Eleven references to Mendel before 1900. Ann Sci 24:7–20
Ophir A, Shapin S (1991) The place of knowledge: a methodological survey. Sci Context 4:3–22
Orel V (1992) Jaroslav Krizenecky (1896-1964), tragic victim of Lysenkoism in Czechoslovakia. Q Rev Biol 67:487–494
Orel V (1996) Gregor Mendel: the first geneticist. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Orel V (2005) Contested memory: debates over the nature of Mendel’s paradigm. Hereditas 142:98–102
Orel V, Hartl DL (1994) Controversies in the interpretation of Mendels discovery. Hist Philos Life Sci 16:436–455
Paleček P (2016) Vítězslav Orel (1926–2015): Gregor Mendel’s biographer and the rehabilitation of genetics in the communist bloc. Hist Philos Life Sci 38:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0104-3
Porter T (2018) Genetics in the madhouse: the unknown history of heredity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Radick G (2011) Physics in the Galtonian sciences of heredity. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 42:129–138
Radick G (2012) Should ‘heredity’ and ‘inheritance’ be biological terms? William Bateson’s change of mind as a historical and philosophical problem. Philos Sci 79:714–724
Radick G (2015) Beyond the ‘Mendel-Fisher controversy. Science 350:159–160
Radick G (2016) Presidential address: experimenting with the scientific past. Br J Hist Sci 49:153–172
Rheinberger H-J (1995) When did Carl Correns read Gregor Mendel’s paper: a research note. Isis 86:612–616
Rheinberger H-J (2008) Heredity and its entities around 1900. Stud Hist Phil Sci 39(2008):370–374
Rheinberger H-J, Müller-Wille S (2017) The Gene: from Genetics to Postgenomics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Roberts HF (1929) Plant hybridization before Mendel. Hafner, New York
Robinson G (1979) A prelude to genetics: theories of a material substance of heredity, Darwin to Weismann. Coronado Press, Lawrence
Roger J (1998) The life sciences in eighteenth-century French thought. Keith B (ed) Robert E (trans). Stanford University Press, Stanford (Originally published in French, 1963)
Russell N (1986) Like Engend’ring like: heredity and animal breeding in early modern England. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sabean DW, Teuscher S, Mathieu J (eds) (2013) Kinship in Europe: approaches to long-term development (1300–1900). Berghahn, New York
Sandler I, Sandler L (1985) A conceptual ambiguity that contributed to the neglect of Mendel’s paper. Hist Philos Life Sci 7:3–70
Sapp J (1987) Beyond the gene: cytoplasmatic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sapp J (1990) The nine lives of Gregor Mendel. In: Le Grand HE (ed) Experimental inquiries historical, philosophical and social studies of experimentation in science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 137–166
Secord JA (2004) Knowledge in transit. Isis 95:654–672
Simunek M, Hoßfeld U, Wissemann V (2011) ‘Rediscovery’ revised: the cooperation of Erich and Armin von Tschermak-Seysenegg in the context of the ‘rediscovery’ of Mendel’s Laws in 1899–1901. Plant Biol 13:835–841
Smith JEH (ed) (2006) The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sosna M (1966) G. Mendel memorial symposium 1865–1965: proceedings of a symposium held in Brno, August 4–7, 1965. Academia, Prague
Stamhuis I, Meijer OG, Zevenhuizen EJA (1999) Hugo de Vries on heredity, 1889-1903: statistics, Mendelian laws, pangenes, mutations. Isis 90:238–267
Stern C, Sherwood ER (eds) (1966) The origin of genetics: a Mendel source book. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
Stubbe H (1963) Kurze Geschichte der Genetik bis zur Wiederentdeckung der Vererbungsregeln Gregor Mendels. Vol. 2/1 of Genetik. Grundlagen, Ergebnisse und Probleme in Einzeldarstellungen. VEB Fischer, Jena
Sturtevant AH (1966) A history of genetics. Modern perspectives in biology. Harper and Row, New York
Tschermak E (1900) Über künstliche Kreuzung bei Pisum sativum. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18:232–239
Tschermak E (ed) (1901) Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Zwei Abhandlungen (1865 und 1869) von Gregor Mendel. Ostwald’s Klassiker der exakten Naturwissenschaften. Nr. 121. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig
de Vries H (1900) Das Spaltungsgesetz Der Bastarde (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18:83–90
Waller J (2012) Breeding: the human history of heredity, race, and sex. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weigel S, Willer S, Jussen B (eds) (2013) Erbe: Übertragungskonzepte zwischen Natur und Kultur. Suhrkamp, Berlin
Weiling F (1992) Zur zeitlichen Datierung des genetischen ‘Notizblattes’ Johann Gregor Mendels. Folia Mendeliana 26–27:17–26
White LA (1949) The science of culture, a study of man and civilisation. Grove Press, New York
Parnes O, Vedder U, Willer S (2008) Das Konzept der Generation: Eine Wissenschafts- und Kulturgeschichte. Frankfurt a. M, Suhrkamp
Wood R, Orel V (2001) Genetic prehistory in selective breeding. A prelude to Mendel. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wood R, Orel V (2005) Scientific breeding in Central Europe during the early nineteenth century: background to Mendel’s later work. J Hist Biol 38:239–272
Zirkle C (1951) Gregor Mendel and his precursors. Isis 42:97–104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Müller-Wille, S. (2018). Gregor Mendel and the History of Heredity. In: Dietrich, M., Borrello, M., Harman, O. (eds) Handbook of the Historiography of Biology. Historiography of Science, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_8-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_8-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74456-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74456-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities