Abstract
[Context and Motivation] User Stories (US) are often used as requirement representation artifacts within agile projects. Within US sets, the nature, granularity and inter-dependencies of the elements constituting each US is not or poorly represented. To deal with these drawbacks, previous research allowed to build a unified model for tagging the elements of the WHO, WHAT and WHY dimensions of a US; each tag representing a concept with an inherent nature and defined granularity. Once tagged, the US elements can be graphically represented with an icon and the modeler can define the inter-dependencies between the elements to build one or more so-called Rationale Trees (RT). [Question/Problem] RT and their benefits have been illustrated on case studies but the ability to easily build a RT in a genuine case for software modelers not familiar with the concepts needs to be evaluated. [Principal ideas/results] This paper presents the result of a double exercise aimed to evaluate how well novice and experienced modelers were able to build a RT out of an existing US set. The experiment explicitly forces the test subjects to attribute a concept to US elements and to link these together. [Contribution] On the basis of the conducted experiment, we highlight the encountered difficulties that the lambda modeler faces when building a RT with basic support. Overall, the test subjects have produced models of satisfying quality. Also, we highlight these necessary conditions that need to be provided to the lambda modeler to build a consistent RT.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://goo.gl/8ZT5tD (this document is refereed to several times in the rest of this paper).
- 2.
- 3.
In the context of the statistical tests conducted in this work, a reliability of 95% has been used.
- 4.
Both the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as well as the Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that the variable of the global score was normally distributed.
References
Abad, K., Pérez, W., Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X.: i* in practice: identifying frequent problems in its application. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2017)
Caire, P., Genon, N., Heymans, P., Moody, D.L.: Visual notation design 2.0: towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations. In: 21st IEEE International RE Conference, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil, pp. 115–124. IEEE Computer Society (2013)
Cohn, M.: Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2009)
Dalpiaz, F.: Teaching goal modeling in undergraduate education. In: Proceedings of the 1st International iStar Teaching Workshop, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1370, pp. 1–6 (2015)
Liskin, O., Pham, R., Kiesling, S., Schneider, K.: Why we need a granularity concept for user stories. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds.) XP 2014. LNBIP, vol. 179, pp. 110–125. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_8
Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Janes, A., Liukkunen, K., Ahmad, M.O.: Comparing requirements decomposition within the scrum, scrum with kanban, XP, and banana development processes. In: Baumeister, H., Lichter, H., Riebisch, M. (eds.) XP 2017. LNBIP, vol. 283, pp. 68–83. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57633-6_5
Trkman, M., Mendling, J., Krisper, M.: Using business process models to better understand the dependencies among user stories. Inf. Softw. Technol. 71, 58–76 (2016)
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Hintea, D., Kolp, M., Poelmans, S.: Bridging user story sets with the use case model. In: Link, S., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9975, pp. 127–138. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_11
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kiv, S., Kolp, M.: User-story driven development of multi-agent systems: a process fragment for agile methods. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 50, 159–176 (2017)
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I.: Unifying and extending user story models. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 211–225. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_15
Wautelet, Y., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Mirbel, I., Poelmans, S.: Building a rationale diagram for evaluating user story sets. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS 2016, Grenoble, France, 1–3 June 2016, pp. 477–488 (2016)
Yu, E., Giorgini, P., Maiden, N., Mylopoulos, J.: Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wautelet, Y., Velghe, M., Heng, S., Poelmans, S., Kolp, M. (2018). On Modelers Ability to Build a Visual Diagram from a User Story Set: A Goal-Oriented Approach. In: Kamsties, E., Horkoff, J., Dalpiaz, F. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77243-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77243-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77242-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77243-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)