Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Creativity Under Duress in Education? pp 99–115Cite as

Creative Ecologies and Education Futures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 3))

Abstract

The challenge to foster greater creativity in education systems represents a range of diverse and complex affordances and constraints. Creativity research in education spans policy, teaching, learning and assessment, as well as environments within and beyond the school that promote creative encounters. Worldwide, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills are marked as essential for effective learners and future employees. Creativity is closely linked with the development of flexible thinking and lateral problem-solving. Yet a shift is occurring from interest in creative individuals to creative ecologies in sociocultural formations of digitally networked cultures and collaborative methods of thinking. The value of attending to increasing creative sociality within and between diverse cultures and contexts is growing. Drawing on an international study of creativity in secondary schools across Australia, Canada, Singapore, and the United States, the authors argue that because creativity in education is central to lifelong learning and work satisfaction, schools must radically shift toward a more interdisciplinary whole-school creative ecology approach, and away from siloed disciplinary and individualist learning. The chapter draws on aspects of creative ecologies in education that combine science, technology, arts, culture, and industry, showing creativity as a fundamental aspect of education across all domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1995). KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005). Creativity in teaching: Essential knowledge, skills and dispositions. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 281–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya, D. E., & Peters, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). Education and the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council Wales. (2015). Creative learning through the arts: An action plan for Wales 2015–2020. Cardiff, Wales: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.arts.wales/arts-in-wales/creative-learning

  • Australian Parliament. (2016). Inquiry into innovation and creativity: Workforce for the new economy. Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/innovationcreativity

  • Baloğlu, N., & Karadağ, E. (2009). Turkish primary school teachers’ constructive thinking styles. Reading Improvement, 4(2), 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2014). Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Progress from traditional to creativity education in Chinese societies. In S. Lau, A. N. N. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: When east meets west (pp. 137–167). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, N., Oh, E., Kwon, J., Kim, H., Chi, E., & Hong, W. (2011). A study on the improvement of secondary school education to bring up students’ creative talents. KICE Research report. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G., & Lucas, B. (2015). Educating Ruby: What our children really need. Carmarthen, Wales: Crown House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). Innovation and creativity: Inquiry into innovation and creativity: Workforce for the new economy. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra: Govt Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowdroy, R., & de Graaff, E. (2005). Assessing highly-creative ability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2008). Studying collaborative creativity: Implications for education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2011). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. Retrieved from http://www.euvonal.hu/images/creativity_report.pdf

  • Craft, A., Chappell, K., & Twining, P. (2008). Learners reconceptualising education: Widening participation through creative engagement? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creative Partnerships UK. (2012). Creative schools development framework. Retrieved from https://creativeweb.creative-partnerships.com/guidance/090921/change-school-csdf-planning-form-guidance,descriptors-and-form.pdf

  • Creative Scotland. (2013). What is creativity? Retrieved from www.creativescotland.com/resources/our-publications/plans-and-strategy-documents/scotlands-creative-learning-plan-2013

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 209–226). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2000). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, L. R. (2016). Expert voices in learning improvisation: Shaping regulation processes through experiential influence. Music Education Research, 19(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1204279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Apprenticing for creativity in the improvisation lesson: A qualitative enquiry. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1359157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Scotland. (n.d.). Research summary: Fostering creativity. Retrieved from http://www.journeytoexcellence.org.uk/resourcesandcpd/research/summaries/rsfosteringcreativity.asp

  • Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. Seville, Spain: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC52374_TN.pdf

  • Flew, T. (2012). Creative industries: Culture and policy. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2015). Insight: The 2015 global creativity index. Retrieved from http://martinprosperity.org/content/insight-the-2015-global-creativity-index/

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015. Toronto, CA: Martin Prosperity Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2005). From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the “creative industries” approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. London, UK: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gollmitzer, M., & Murray, C. (2008). From economy to ecology: A policy framework for creative labour. Centre of expertise on culture and communities, Ottawa, ON: Canadian Conference of the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/C_Murray/publication/228717986_From_economy_to_ecology_A_policy_framework_for_creative_labour/links/55b7cdbd08ae092e96575948.pdf

  • Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., & Oshige, K. (2011). Self-regulation, co-regulation and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulation learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113, 240–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2013). Peered and tiered learning: Action research as creative cultural pedagogy. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.815046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: Toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2016). Creativity and education. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2017). Creative ecologies: Fostering creativity in secondary schools. [Final Report]. Retrieved from https://www.creativeresearchhub.com

  • Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2017a). STEAM Education: Fostering creativity in and beyond secondary schools. Australian Art Education, 38(1), 54–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2017b). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 18(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, G., Roodhouse, S., & Blakey, J. (2007). From value chain to value creating ecology: Implications for creative industries development policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(4), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, H., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, J., & Griffin, P. (2015). Framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Methods and approach (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. A. (2009). Interdisciplinary strategies as transformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2011). Creative ecologies: Where thinking is a proper job. Brunswick, GA: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E. J., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B. (Ed.). (2006). Creative learning practices: European experiences. London, UK: The Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2006). Creative learning and possibility thinking. In B. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative learning practices: European experiences (pp. 73–91). London, UK: The Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kačerauskas, T., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Creative ecology in academic environment. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(3), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. W., Chung, Y. L., Woo, A. J., & Lee, H. J. (2012). Development of a theoretical model for STEAM education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 388–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2010). We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London, UK: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S., & Leung, B. W. (2013). Creative arts in education and culture. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. Y., & Cho, S. (2011). Predicting creative problem-solving in math from a dynamic system model of creative problem-solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2009). Wider skills for learning: What are they, how can they be cultivated, how could they be measured and why are they important for innovation? London, UK: NESTA Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, B, Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in Student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments (OECD Education Working Papers.) Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/progression-in-student-creativity-in-school_5k4dp59msdwk-en

  • McPherson, G. E., & Renwick, J. (2011). Self-regulation and mastery of musical skills. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 234–248). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009). Creativity in school. In K. Littleton, C. Woods, & J. K. Staarman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology: New perspectives on learning and teaching. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • NACCCE. (National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London, UK: The International Foundation for Creative Learning. Retrieved from http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/all-our-futures-creativity-culture-and-education

  • NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts). (2012). Plan I: The Case for Innovation Led Growth. London, UK: NESTA. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/.

  • Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J., & Wynne, D. (2017). From the margins to the centre: Cultural production and consumption in the post-industrial city. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2006). Nurturing creativity in young people: A report to government to inform future policy. London, UK: Department of Education and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.creativetallis.com/uploads/2/2/8/7/2287089/nurturing-1.pdf

  • Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford, UK: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. I. (2012). Global capitalism theory and the emergence of transnational elites. Critical Sociology, 38(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511411592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers’ judgements of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes – research, development, and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K., & De Zutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Journal of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2009). The paradox of choice. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelig, T. (2012). inGenius: A crash course on creativity. New York, NY: Hay House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton-Green, J. (2011). Creative learning: Policies, practices, schools and young people. Sydney, Australia: The Creative Learning Forum/The Dusseldorp Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.julianseftongreen.net/

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, N., & Jang, Y. J. (2017). Group creativity training for children: Lessons learned from two award-winning teams. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01205.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J. (2012). Transnational state. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopaedia of globalization (1st ed., pp. 2031–2037). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankevičienė, J., Levickaitė, R., Braškutė, M., & Noreikaitė, E. (2011). Creative ecologies: Developing and managing new concepts of creative economy. Business, Management and Education, 9(2), 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taddei, F. (2009). Training creative and collaborative knowledge-builders: A major challenge for 21st century education. (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) background paper). Retrieved from http://cri-paris.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/ocde-francois-taddei-fev2009.pdf

  • Tan, A. G. (2014). Creativity in cross-disciplinary research. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity re-search: An interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research handbook (pp. 68–85). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanggaard, L., & Elmholdt, C. (2008). Assessment in practice: An inspiration from apprenticeship. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Warwick Commission. (2015). Enriching Britain: Culture, creativity and growth. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., & Sefton-Green, J. (Eds.). (2010). Researching creative learning: Methods and approaches. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. Finnigan & A. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill – Policy implications of research in education (Vol. 2, pp. 163–175). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vass, E., & Littleton, K. (2009). Analysing role distribution in children’s computer-mediated collaborative creative writing. In K. Kumpulainen, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & M. Cesar (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 99–120). Sense: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the US as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekarts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The empirical research discussed in this chapter was funded by the Australian Research Council DECRA fellowship: Anne Harris, Project #DE140100421, The Creative Turn: Creativity and Innovation in Secondary Schools (2014-2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Anne M. Harris & Leon de Bruin

Authors
  1. Anne M. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leon de Bruin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne M. Harris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Blacksburg Campus, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Carol A. Mullen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harris, A.M., de Bruin, L. (2019). Creative Ecologies and Education Futures. In: Mullen, C.A. (eds) Creativity Under Duress in Education?. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90272-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation