Skip to main content

Passive Probing Perception: Effect of Latency in Visual-Haptic Feedback

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications (EuroHaptics 2018)

Abstract

Latency is detrimental to haptic systems, specifically in networked telepresence systems. Although the latency effect on stiffness is well studied in the literature, it is not very clear if the latency effects on the stiffness perception are due to the displacement perception or the force perception. In this study, we propose passive probing which involves force perception alone, without any displacement of the finger, for studying latency effects. A psychophysical experiment is conducted with a set of artificially induced latencies which provides a quantitative measure of the effect of these latencies on three parameters: Just Noticeable Difference (JND), the time taken to reach the reference forces and the maximum overshoot. The results showed that the latency has a significant effect on the user ability in task performance after 185.5 ms. From the observation, the latency effect on JND in passive probing is similar to that of the stiffness perception (active probing) task which shows that the effect is significantly higher on the force perception rather than on the displacement perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashok, K., Ravali, G., Manivannan, M.: Pseudo-haptics: a feasibility study of force feedback using computer-mouse. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bovy, C., Mertodimedjo, H., Hooghiemstra, G., Uijterwaal, H., Van Mieghem, P.: Analysis of end-to-end delay measurements in internet. In: Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurements Workshop (PAM) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, K., Fukuda, K., Esaki, H., Kato, A.: Observing slow crustal movement in residential user traffic. In: Proceedings of 2008 ACM CoNEXT Conference, p. 12. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Luca, M., Knörlein, B., Ernst, M.O., Harders, M.: Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Res. Bull. 85(5), 245–259 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gescheider, G.A.: Psychophysics: The Fundamentals. Psychology Press, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaaresoja, T., Anttila, E., Hoggan, E.: The effect of tactile feedback latency in touchscreen interaction. In: 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 65–70. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, J., Kim, H., Tay, B.K., Muniyandi, M., Srinivasan, M.A., Jordan, J., Mortensen, J., Oliveira, M., Slater, M.: Transatlantic touch: a study of haptic collaboration over long distance. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 13(3), 328–337 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, A., Gourishetti, R., Manivannan, M.: Mechanics of pseudo-haptics with computer mouse. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games (HAVE), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lecuyer, A., Coquillart, S., Kheddar, A., Richard, P., Coiffet, P.: Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 Conference, VR 2000, pp. 83-. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2000). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=832288.835776

  10. Lee, D., Cho, K., Iannaccone, G., Moon, S.: Has internet delay gotten better or worse? In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies, pp. 51–54. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Rubino, F., Smith, M., Vix, M., Simone, M., Mutter, D.: Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann. Surg. 235(4), 487 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nisky, I., Leib, R., Milstein, A., Karniel, A.: Perception of stiffness with force feedback delay. In: Di Luca, M. (ed.) Multisensory Softness, pp. 167–185. Springer, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6533-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. van Polanen, V., Davare, M.: Sensorimotor memory biases weight perception during object lifting. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 700 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prasad, M.R., Manivannan, M., Chandramohan, S.: Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training. Surg. Endosc. 29(7), 1927–1943 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prasad, M.R., Purswani, S., Manivannan, M.: Force JND for right index finger using contra lateral force matching paradigm. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds.) ICoRD 2013. LNME, pp. 365–375. Springer, New Delhi (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Pressman, A., Welty, L.J., Karniel, A., Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A.: Perception of delayed stiffness. Int. J. Robot. Res. 26(11–12), 1191–1203 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rank, M., Shi, Z., Müller, H.J., Hirche, S.: Perception of delay in haptic telepresence systems. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 19(5), 389–399 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, Z., Zou, H., Rank, M., Chen, L., Hirche, S., Muller, H.J.: Effects of packet loss and latency on the temporal discrimination of visual-haptic events. IEEE Trans. Haptics 3(1), 28–36 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simsek, M., Aijaz, A., Dohler, M., Sachs, J., Fettweis, G.: 5G-enabled tactile internet. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 34(3), 460–473 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogels, I.M.: Detection of temporal delays in visual-haptic interfaces. Hum. Fact. 46(1), 118–134 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Winters, J.M., Crago, P.E.: Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2104-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, B., Sim, S.H., Enquobahrie, A., Ortiz, R.: Effects of visual latency on visual-haptic experience of stiffness. In: 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ravali Gourishetti or M. Manivannan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gourishetti, R., Isaac, J.H.R., Manivannan, M. (2018). Passive Probing Perception: Effect of Latency in Visual-Haptic Feedback. In: Prattichizzo, D., Shinoda, H., Tan, H., Ruffaldi, E., Frisoli, A. (eds) Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10893. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93445-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93445-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93444-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93445-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics