Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Formation of Industry 4.0 in Developed and Developing Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 169))

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to perform comparative analysis of formation of Industry 4.0 in developed and developing countries. As peculiarities of formation of Industry 4.0 in developed countries have been studied in this book in the process of studying successful experience of formation of Industry 4.0 in the countries of the world, the authors focus on determining the specifics of formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries. In order to ensure compatibility of data for developed and developing countries, the similar methods are used—which are based on the authors’ methodological recommendations for monitoring the process of formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries in 2017 and evaluating effectiveness of Industry 4.0 from the point of view of stimulation of development of knowledge economy in developing countries. During comparison of results of research of the essence and peculiarities of formation of Industry 4.0 in developed and developing countries, the method of comparative analysis is used. For determining the barriers on the path of formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries, the authors use the method of systemic and problem analysis. For complex study of specifics of formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries, the objects are the countries that are peculiar for various levels of socio-economic development and belonging to various geographical regions of the world: the South African Republic, China, India, and Brazil. As a result of the research, it is substantiated that the process of formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries has its peculiarities and is different than in developed countries. As compared to developed countries, in which the process of formation of Industry 4.0 was started earlier and aimed at marketing and social results, developing countries face institutional (absence of state policy of formation of Industry 4.0) and financial barriers and seek economic goals. At the same time, the initiative approach to formation of Industry 4.0 in developing countries, within which the initiators of this process are economic subjects (companies), envisages larger flexibility and effectiveness as compared to the directive approach (state initiative), which is applied in developed countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bogoviz, A. V., Lobova, S. V., Ragulina, Y. V., Luchitskaya, L. B., & Shutova, T. V. (2017). Boosting innovative activity in companies: Problems and potential. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 12(6), 1690–1701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolini, M., Ferrari, E., Gamberi, M., Pilati, F., & Faccio, M. (2017). Assembly system design in the Industry 4.0 era: A general framework. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 5700–5705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, L., Ramakrishna, S., & Singh, S. (2017). A review of digital manufacturing-based hybrid additive manufacturing processes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNI. (2017). Industry 4.0: a new challenge for Brazilian Industry. https://static-cms-si.s3.amazonaws.com/media/filer_public/f4/e8/f4e81f50-b13f-4339-89e1-8fd1b1d1a470/special_survey_industry40.pdf. Data accessed: December 24, 2017.

  • Gupta, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 should be India’s battle cry. http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/FFEZxIVLm7y312vw8n80QJ/Industry-40-should-be-Indias-battle-cry.html. Data accessed: December 24, 2017.

  • Ignat, V. (2017). Digitalization and the global technology trends. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 227(1), 012062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunication Union. (2017). The Information-communication technologies development index 2017. https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html#idi2017economycard-tab&RUS. Data accessed: December 23, 2017.

  • Li, L. (2017). China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2017). Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise South Africa highlights. https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/south-africa-industry-4.0-report.pdf. Data accessed: December 24, 2017.

  • Sackey, S. M., Bester, A., & Adams, D. (2017). Industry 4.0 learning factory didactic design parameters for industrial engineering education in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 28(1), 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.Y., Oliveira e Sá, J., Andrade, C., …, Galvão, J. (2017). A big data system supporting Bosch Braga industry 4.0 strategy. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 750–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, E. (2017). Modern security solutions for industry 4.0 | [Moderne sicherheitskonzepte für industrie 4.0]. ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 112(10), 704–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Council of China. (2015). Made in China 2025. http://www.cittadellascienza.it/cina/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IoT-ONE-Made-in-China-2025.pdf. Data accessed: December 24, 2017.

  • Suri, K., Gaaloul, W., Cuccuru, A., & Gerard, S. (2017). Semantic framework for internet of things-aware business process development. In Proceedings2017 IEEE 26th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE 2017, 8003819, pp. 214–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortorella, G. L., & Fettermann, D. (2017). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2017). Research and development expenditure. http://www.uis.unesco.org/. Data accessed: December 23, 2017.

  • Zhang, H., Liu, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, D., & Leng, J. (2017). A digital twin-based approach for designing and decoupling of hollow glass production line. IEEE Access, 2(1), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksei V. Bogoviz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bogoviz, A.V., Osipov, V.S., Chistyakova, M.K., Borisov, M.Y. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Formation of Industry 4.0 in Developed and Developing Countries. In: Popkova, E., Ragulina, Y., Bogoviz, A. (eds) Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics