Skip to main content

Blessings of Local Autonomy? Does It Matter? For What? How?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 781 Accesses

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

In this chapter local autonomy is treated as an independent variable. We want to know whether there is a causal link between the degree of autonomy and the performance of the different countries in terms of the quality of democracy, economic growth, corruption and happiness. The chapter starts with some theoretical remarks concerning the expected impact and shows that there are in fact positive relations between local autonomy and input as well as output-related aspects of local government. These links remain positive even when we control for the size of the municipalities and whether they belong to the group of former communist countries. Our conclusion, however, is a bit more cautious. It remains doubtful whether one can simply increase the autonomy of the municipalities to increase the performance of local government. This process is likely to be more complicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.democracybarometer.org/concept_en.html (consulted in 2018).

  2. 2.

    See https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview (consulted in 2018).

References

  • Andrews, C. W., & De Vries, M. S. (2007). High Expectations, Varying Outcomes: Decentralization and Participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 424–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, R. J. (Ed.). (1990). Decentralization, Local Governments, and Markets: Towards a Post-Welfare Agenda. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., & Giebler, H. (2012). Demokratiebarometer – ein neues Instrument zur Messung von Demokratiequalität. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6(1), 115–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Andersson, F., Bernhard, M., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C. H., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Miri, F., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Sigman, R., Staton, J., & Zimmerman, B. (2016). V-Dem Codebook v6. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Sweden: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardanelli, P., Kincaid, J., Fenna, A., Kaiser, A., Lecours, A., & Singh, A. K (2017). Conceptualising, Measuring, and Theorising Dynamic De/Centralisation in Federations. Paper Presented at the 24th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Poznan, Poland, 23–28 July 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. S. (2000). The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries. European Journal of Political Research, 38(2), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D. J. (1976). Federalism vs. Decentralization: The Drift from Authenticity. Publius, 6(4), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesler, J. W. (1965). Approaches to the Understanding of Decentralization. The Journal of Politics, 27(3), 536–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2004). Approaches to Decentralization and Local Autonomy: A Critical Appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 523–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3(8), 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wayenberg, W. (2016). Institutional Impact Assessment in Multi-level Systems: Conceptualizing Decentralization Effects from a Comparative Perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, A., Baldersheim, H., Copus, C., Hlynsdóttir, M., Kettunen, P., & Klimovský, D. (2016). Reforming Local Councils and the Role of Councillors: A Comparative Analysis of Fifteen European Countries. In S. Kuhlmann & B. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local Public Sector Reform in Times of Crisis. National Trajectories and International Comparisons (pp. 287–300). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Governance Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W., Bühlmann, M., Müller, L., & Wessels, B. (2012). The Democracy Barometer. A New Instrument for Measuring the Quality of Democracy and Its Potential for Comparative Research. European Political Science, 11(1), 519–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2004). Development Evaluation: Lessons Learned on Donor Support to Decentralisation and Local Governance. DAC Evaluation Series, 1–83. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, L. (2004). Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the ‘New Localism’. Political Studies, 52, 358–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UCLG (United Cities and Local Governments). (2008). Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World. First global Report by United Cities and Local Governments 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat. (2009). International Guidelines on Decentralisation and Access to Basic Services for all. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2011). Government Decentralization in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1992). Urban Politics and Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ladner, A. et al. (2019). Blessings of Local Autonomy? Does It Matter? For What? How?. In: Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics