Skip to main content

A framework for studying differences in people’s digital media uses

  • Chapter
Grenzenlose Cyberwelt?

Abstract

Information technologies have become a staple of adolescents’ lives with young people among the most connected in countries that have seen high levels of Internet and cell phone diffusion by the first decade of the 21st century (Livingstone and Bober 2004; National Telecommunications and Information Administration 2004). However, merely knowing various digital media’s rates of use says little about how young people are incorporating IT into their everyday lives. Ignoring nuanced measures of use, it is difficult to determine whether digital media are leveling the playing field for youth or whether they are raising new barriers for some while advantaging the societal positions of others. While many have suggested that we must move past the binary classification of haves and have-nots when it comes to information technology uses, few have offered a detailed conceptual framework for such an undertaking, one that can then inform empirical studies of usage differences. This chapter considers the various domains in which users of the Internet may possess different levels of knowhow. In addition to presenting the conceptual framework, it also draws on unique data about a diverse group of young people’s Internet uses to illustrate existing differences along the lines of the discussed dimensions.

The author would like to thank Brigid Barron, Greg Duncan, Karen Mossberger and Connie Yowell for helpful conversations on this topic, Ann Feldman and Tom Moss for supporting the study at UIC, and Laurell Sims, Dan Li, Vanessa Pineda and Erika Priestley for assistance with data collection and data entry. The author is also grateful to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Northwestern University Research Grants Committee, the Northwestern School of Communication Innovation Fund and the Northwestern Department of Communication Research Fund for their support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Attewell, P. 2001. “The first and second digital divides.” Sociology of education 74:252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B. 2000. “The Gender Gap on the Internet.“ Social Science Quarterly 81:868–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli, Heinz. 2002. “The Internet and Knowledge Gaps. A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation.” European Journal of Communication 17:65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, E. 2000. “Social Access to the Internet.“ Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5:50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunz, Ulla. 2004. “The Computer-Email-Web Fluency Scale: Development and Validation.“ International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17:477–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, Coral Celeste, and Steven Shafer. 2004. “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.“ Pp. 355–400 in Social Inequality, edited by Kathryn Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Susannah. 2005. “Health Information Online.“ Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, Eszter. 2002. “Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills.“ First Monday 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. “The Digital Divide and What To Do About It.“ in The New Economy Handbook, edited by Derek C. Jones. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004a. “The Changing Online Landscape: From Free-for-All to Commercial Gatekeeping.“ in Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Action/Global Interaction, edited by Peter and Doug Schuler Day: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004b. “Internet Access and Use in Context.“ New Media & Society 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. “Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy.“ Social Science Computer Review 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, Eszter, and Steven Shafer. 2006. “Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender.“ Social Science Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Philip N., Lee Rainie, and Steve Jones. 2001. “Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology.“ American Behavioral Scientist 45:383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.E., and R.E. Rice. 2002. Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Sonia., and Magdalena Bober. 2004. “UK Children Go Online.“ Pp. 1–61: Economic & Social Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loges, William E., and Joo-Young Jung. 2001. “Exploring the Digital Divide: Internet Connectedness and Age.“ Communications Research 28:536–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, Marry. 2003. “America’s Online Pursuits.“ Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Mary Stansbury. 2003. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 2000. “Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion.“ Washington, DC: NTIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age.“ Washington, D.C.: NTIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet in Democratic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, Jan A.G.M. 2005. The Deepening Divide. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. 2003. Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B, A.Q. Haase, J. Witte, and K Hampton. 2002. “Capitalizing on the Internet: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community.“ Pp. 436–455 in The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by B. Wellman and H. Haythornthwaite. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, Anthony G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hargittai, E. (2007). A framework for studying differences in people’s digital media uses. In: Grenzenlose Cyberwelt?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_7

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15319-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90519-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics