Abstract
Information technologies have become a staple of adolescents’ lives with young people among the most connected in countries that have seen high levels of Internet and cell phone diffusion by the first decade of the 21st century (Livingstone and Bober 2004; National Telecommunications and Information Administration 2004). However, merely knowing various digital media’s rates of use says little about how young people are incorporating IT into their everyday lives. Ignoring nuanced measures of use, it is difficult to determine whether digital media are leveling the playing field for youth or whether they are raising new barriers for some while advantaging the societal positions of others. While many have suggested that we must move past the binary classification of haves and have-nots when it comes to information technology uses, few have offered a detailed conceptual framework for such an undertaking, one that can then inform empirical studies of usage differences. This chapter considers the various domains in which users of the Internet may possess different levels of knowhow. In addition to presenting the conceptual framework, it also draws on unique data about a diverse group of young people’s Internet uses to illustrate existing differences along the lines of the discussed dimensions.
The author would like to thank Brigid Barron, Greg Duncan, Karen Mossberger and Connie Yowell for helpful conversations on this topic, Ann Feldman and Tom Moss for supporting the study at UIC, and Laurell Sims, Dan Li, Vanessa Pineda and Erika Priestley for assistance with data collection and data entry. The author is also grateful to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Northwestern University Research Grants Committee, the Northwestern School of Communication Innovation Fund and the Northwestern Department of Communication Research Fund for their support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Attewell, P. 2001. “The first and second digital divides.” Sociology of education 74:252–259.
Bimber, B. 2000. “The Gender Gap on the Internet.“ Social Science Quarterly 81:868–876.
Bonfadelli, Heinz. 2002. “The Internet and Knowledge Gaps. A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation.” European Journal of Communication 17:65–84.
Bucy, E. 2000. “Social Access to the Internet.“ Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5:50–61.
Bunz, Ulla. 2004. “The Computer-Email-Web Fluency Scale: Development and Validation.“ International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17:477–504.
DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, Coral Celeste, and Steven Shafer. 2004. “Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use.“ Pp. 355–400 in Social Inequality, edited by Kathryn Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fox, Susannah. 2005. “Health Information Online.“ Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Hargittai, Eszter. 2002. “Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills.“ First Monday 7.
—. 2003. “The Digital Divide and What To Do About It.“ in The New Economy Handbook, edited by Derek C. Jones. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press.
—. 2004a. “The Changing Online Landscape: From Free-for-All to Commercial Gatekeeping.“ in Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Action/Global Interaction, edited by Peter and Doug Schuler Day: Routledge.
—. 2004b. “Internet Access and Use in Context.“ New Media & Society 6.
—. 2005. “Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy.“ Social Science Computer Review 23.
Hargittai, Eszter, and Steven Shafer. 2006. “Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender.“ Social Science Quarterly.
Howard, Philip N., Lee Rainie, and Steve Jones. 2001. “Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology.“ American Behavioral Scientist 45:383–404.
Katz, J.E., and R.E. Rice. 2002. Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Livingstone, Sonia., and Magdalena Bober. 2004. “UK Children Go Online.“ Pp. 1–61: Economic & Social Research Council.
Loges, William E., and Joo-Young Jung. 2001. “Exploring the Digital Divide: Internet Connectedness and Age.“ Communications Research 28:536–562.
Madden, Marry. 2003. “America’s Online Pursuits.“ Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Mary Stansbury. 2003. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 2000. “Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion.“ Washington, DC: NTIA.
—. 2004. “A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age.“ Washington, D.C.: NTIA.
Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet in Democratic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Jan A.G.M. 2005. The Deepening Divide. London: Sage Publications.
Warschauer, M. 2003. Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Wellman, B, A.Q. Haase, J. Witte, and K Hampton. 2002. “Capitalizing on the Internet: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community.“ Pp. 436–455 in The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by B. Wellman and H. Haythornthwaite. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilhelm, Anthony G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hargittai, E. (2007). A framework for studying differences in people’s digital media uses. In: Grenzenlose Cyberwelt?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_7
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15319-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90519-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)