Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economics of Networks

  • Chapter
Frontiers in Economics

Abstract

This question was raised by some participants when the topic was suggested as a special module for this project. Many economists working in academia, government institutions, and business have reservations about whether this field of economic research really warrants special attention. On the other hand, the number of scientific articles and conferences using network economics as a label to address issues related to actual organizational phenomena and physical networks increased significantly during the 1990s. Since 1997, the German Research Council (DFG) has even been financing an interdisciplinary Special Research Section (SFB) on Networking as a Factor in Competition 3 at the University of Frankfurt/Main. Furthermore, the rapid worldwide growth of the Internet and the dramatic changes accompanying the de- and re-regulation of network industries, which have been subject to the close control of government institutions in most countries, have stimulated debate on applied and practical political topics, as well as a more fundamental theoretical debate within the economic profession. This internal debate addresses the importance of networks as new entities in modern developed economies throughout the world, and the implications of networks for the developing countries wishing to catch up.1 Well-known economists have set up web sites to address this topic as their special research area.2

“What has changed? There is a central difference between the old and new economies: the old industrial economy was driven by economies of scale; the new information economy is driven by the economics of networks.”

(Shapiro/Varian 1999, p. 173)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970), The market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amman, H. M. (1999), Netnomics–A new branch in economics, Netnomics, 1, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. ed. (1992), The Economics of Information Networks, Amsterdam - London - New York — Tokyo: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1984), The Co-operative Game Theory of The Firm, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B.W. (1989), Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events, Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach S. and G. Erber (1999a), Electronic Commerce, Opportunities and Risks of Global Electronic Business Transaction, Economic Bulletin, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach S. and G. Erber (2001), Electronic Commerce: A Need for Regulation?, in: The World Trade Organization Millennium Round, Freer Trade in the Next Decade, eds. K. G. Deutsch und B. Speyer, Routledge, London–New York, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. J., Johansson, B., Snickars, F., Thord, R. (1998), Knowledge and Networks in a Dynamic Economy, Festschrift in Honor of Ake E. Andersson, Berlin-Heidelberg - New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. et al. (1998), Europe’s Network Industries: Conflicting Priorities, Monitoring European Deregulation 1, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickenbach, F. (1998), Auf dem Weg zu einer europäischen Wirtschaftsverfassung fur Netzinfrastrukturen: Ausgangssituation, Veränderungen und offene Fragen, Kiel Working Papers No. 896, Kiel Institute of World Economics, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWT, BMBF (1999), Innovation und Arbeitsplätze in der Informationsgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts,Berlin-Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. F. and R. J. Gordon eds. (1997), The Economics of New Goods, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 58, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago — London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimatoribus, M., A. De Tommaso, P. Neri (1998), Impacts of the 1996 Telecommunications Act on the US model of telecommunications policy, Telecommunications Policy, 22 (6), 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937), The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendit, S., P. Llerena, H. Stahn, G. Umbhauer eds. (1998), The Economics of Networks, Interaction and Behaviours, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comes, R. and Sandler, T. (1996), The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1985), Clio and the Economic of QWERTY, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinc, M., K. E. Hayes, R. R. Stough and S. Yilmaz (1998), Regional universal telecommunication service provision in the US. Efficiency versus penetration, Telecommunications Policy, 22, 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1980), The Role of Investment in Entry-Deterrence, Economic Journal, 90, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. (1996), The economics of networks, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 673–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. and D. Fudenberg (1993), Rules of Thumb and Social Learning, Journal of Political Economy, 101, 612–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. and D. Fudenberg (1995), Word and mouth communications and social learning, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 93–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., H. Hagemann and S. Seiter (2000), Wachstums-und beschäftigungspolitische Implikationen des Informations-und Kommunikationssektors,Berlin-Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., and M. Horn (2000), Deregulierung führt zu deutlichen Preissenkungen für Telefondienstleistungen und Strom, DIW-Wochenbericht, No. 25, 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., and M. Horn (2001), California’s Electricity Crisis–A Warning Sign for Europe?, Economic Bulletin, No. 9, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., S. Bach and H. Joffe (2001), Wirtschaftspolitische Aspekte des E-Commerce: Themen und Akteure, Gutachten für den Deutschen Bundestag vorgelegt dem Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung„ Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC (1998), Internet Over Cable: Defining the Future in Terms of the Past, Federal Communications Commission, Office of Plans and Policy, OPP Working Paper no. 30, Washington D. C., August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feketekuty, G. (1998), Setting the Agenda for the Next Round of Negotiations on Trade in Services, in: Launching New Global trade Talks, An Action Agenda, Special Report No. 12, Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C., September, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1984), The Fat-Cat Effect, the Puppy-Dog Ploy, and the Lean and Hungry Look, American Economic Review, 74, May, 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genosko, J. (1998), Netzwerke in der Regionalpolitik, Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. (1998), In a World without Borders, The Impact of Taxes on Internet Commerce, NBER Working Paper 6863, Cambridge, Massachusetts, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröhn, A. (1999), Netzwerkeffekte und Wettbewerbspolitik, Eine ökonomische Analyse des Softwaremarktes, Kieler Studien 296, ed. H. Siebert, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, M. M. and A. K. McAdams, (1997), The Economic Efficiency of Internet Public Goods, Internet Economics, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W. (1989), Facts and ideas in microeconomic theory, European Economic Review, 33, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W. (1993), The Law of Demand, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. and J. C. Stein (1999), A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets, The Journal of Finance, 54, 2143–2184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. and R. Landau eds. (1989), Technology and Capital Formation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow (1996), Does Stranded Recovery Distort Competition?, The Electricity Journal 9, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahin, B. and J. Abbate eds. (1995), Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, A Publication of the Harvard Information Infrastructure Project, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. P. (1992), Whom or what does the representative individual represent, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. P. (1993), Ants, Rationality, and Recruitment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert, J. and H. Klodt (2000), Megafusionen. Trends, Ursachen und Implikationen, Kieler Studien 302, ed. H. Siebert, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfenstein, B. C. (1997), Internet Economics: An Annotated Bibliography, Journal of Media Eonomics, bzw. http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/tcom/annota.html.

  • Köster, D. (1998), Was sind Netzprodukte?–Eigenschaften, Definition und Systematisierung von Netzprodukten, Discussionpaper FS IV 98–10, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, H. (1997), Zur Tertiarisierung der deutschen Volkswirtschaft, in K. Mangold (ed.), Die Zukunft der Dienstleistung, Wiesbaden: Gabler, 171–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1998), A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1971), Consumer Demand: A New Approach, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (1998), European Mediamatics. Coping with convergence and globalization, Telecommunications Policy, 22, No. 6, 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac-Kie-Mason, J. K. and H. R. Varian (1994), Pricing Congestible Network Resources, University of Michigan, 17th November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E. (1998), Intellectual Property Rights in the World trade Organization: Progress and Prospects, in: Launching New Global trade Talks, An Action Agenda, Special Report No. 12, Institute for International Economics, Washington D. C., September, 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, L. W. and J. Bailey (1997), Internet Economics, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, J. (1998), Competition aspects of pricing access to networks. What are the issues?, Telecommunications Policy, 22, No. 6, 467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, (1990), The Lever of Riches, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monopolkommission (2000), Wettbewerb auf Telekommunikations-und Postmärkten?, Sondergutachten der Monopolkommission gemäß § 81 Abs. 3 Telekommunikationsgesetz und § 44 Postgesetz, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCO/CIC (1998), Next Generation Internet, Implementation Plan, National Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and Communications, Washington D. C., February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. and S. Siokos (1997), Financial Networks, Statics and Dynamics, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Political economy of Institutions and Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NSTC (1998), Networked Computing for the 21st Century, Computing, Information and Communications, Supplement to the President’s FY 1999 Budget, Report of the Subcommittee on Computing, Information, and Communications R&D, National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYT (1999), Patents Multiply and Web Sites Find Lawsuits Are Just a Click Away, New York Times, 11`11 Dec. 1999, Al & C14.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998), A Borderless World: Realizing the Potential of Global Electronic Commerce, Report on International and Regional Bodies: Activities and Initiatives in Electronic Commerce, Ottawa, 7–9 October 1998, SG/EC(98)10/Final, Paris, 13th January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999a), Recommendation of the OECD Council Concerning Guidelines for Consumer Protection in the Context of Electronic Commerce, Paris, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999b), Building Infrastructure Capacity for Electronic Commerce, Leased Line Development and Pricing, Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policy, DSTIIICCP/TISP(99)4/Final, Paris, 11th June.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999c), Progress Report on the OECD Action Plan for Electronic Commerce, Progress Report on the OECD Action Plan for Electronic Commerce, Paris, October.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M, Jr. (1996), Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others are Poor, Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, No. 2, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare, London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preissl, B., Erber, G., Kreh, O. (2000), Arbeitsmarkteffekte und Electronic Commerce, Konzeptionelle Überlegungen, Gutachten im Auftrag der Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung Baden Württemberg, Arbeitsbericht Nr. 170, Stuttgart, Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung Baden Württemberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. B. K. (1998), Change, politics and determinist economics in Europe, Telecommunications Policy, 22, No. 6, 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1998), Modeling Bounded Rationality, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. (1993), Recent advances in evolutionary economics, Comments, Economic Letters, 42, 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. (1997), Internet Pricing: A Regulatory Imperative, in: Internet Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 479–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and H. A. Varian (1999), Information Rules: a Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1983), Models of Bounded Rationality, 2 Vols., Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. H. (1991), The Scientific Illusion in Empirical Macroeconomics, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93, 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1991), Sunk Costs and Market Structure, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbhauer, G. (1998), Introduction, in S. Cohendit et al. (eds.), The Economics of Networks, Interaction and Behaviours, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1995), The Digital Divide, A Survey of the “Have Nots” in Rural and Urban America, Washington D. C., July.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1998a), The Emerging Digital Economy, Washington D. C., June.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1999a), The Emerging Digital Economy I I, Washington D. C., June.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1999b), Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide, A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America, National Telecommunication and Information Administration & U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D. C., July.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1999c), The Digital Workforce: Building Infotech Skills at the Speed of Innovation, Office of Technology Policy, Washington D. C., June.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Working Group on Electronic Commerce (1998), First Annual Report, Washington D. C., November.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Working Group on Electronic Commerce (1999), Toward Digital eQuality, Second Annual Report, Washington D. C., December.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. The White House (1997), A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce, Washington D. C. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne, M. and E. Brynjolfsson (1996), Communication Networks and the Rise of an Information Elite, Do Computers Help the Rich get Richer?, MIT Sloan School of Management, http://www.mit.edu/marshall/www/home.html, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Van Alstyne, M. and E. Brynjolfsson (1997) Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?, MIT Sloan School of Management, http://www.mit.edu/marshall/www/home.html, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Varian, H. R. (1989), What Use is Economic Theory?, paper presented at a conference “Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?” 29th-30th October 1992, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1999), Market Structure in the Network Age, University of California, Berkeley, 17th June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. and J. M. Vernon, J. E. Harrington (1998), Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulkan, N. (1999), Economic Implication of Agent Technology and E-Commerce, The Economic Journal, 109, F67 - F90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xavier, P. (1998), The licensing of telecommunication suppliers. Beyond the EU’s Directive, Telecommunications Policy, 22, No. 6, July, 483–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerdick, Axel, et al. (1999), Die Internet-Ökonomie, Strategien fur die digitale Wirtschaft, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), Germany

    Georg Erber

  2. Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (Institute for Economics), Germany

    Harald Hagemann

Authors
  1. Georg Erber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Hagemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Königin-Luise-Straße 5, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Klaus F. Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erber, G., Hagemann, H. (2002). Economics of Networks. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Frontiers in Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24739-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24739-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07756-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24739-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation