Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Each disaster reminds us that, from an economic standpoint, losses do not occur instantaneously, but are accumulated over the course of a sometimes long and complex recovery process. Moreover, disasters are spatial events that impact some places and some groups within those places more heavily than others. These effects can be observed in both natural disasters and human-induced events. Thus in the September 11th tragedy of 2001, the loss of the World Trade Center towers and the thousands of human lives do not in themselves constitute the economic impact of the disaster. Neither does the loss of gross regional product (GRP) on the 11th itself. Rather, the economic impact of the disaster is strongly influenced by the multitude of decisions made in the days and months following — decisions regarding whether to relocate an office to New Jersey and for how long, whether to lay off workers and how many, and whether to inject stimulus spending into the New York City economy and how much. Similar post-event decisions strongly influence recovery in natural disasters such as floods or earthquakes. In other words, the process of disaster recovery is critical to understanding the spatial economic impacts of disasters, yet the recovery process itself is extremely complex and uncertain.

This work was supported by the Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number ECC-9701471 to the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesch, D.J. and J.N. Holly. 1998. “Small Business Failure, Survival, and Recovery: Lessons from the January 1994 Northridge Earthquake,” NEHRP Conference and Workshop on Research on the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994. Richmond, CA; CUREe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P.R., J. Kartez, and D. Wenger. 1993. “Recovery after Disaster: Achieving Sustainable Development, Mitigation and Equity,” Disasters, 17 (2): 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. New York, NY; Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. 1993. Household and Community Recovery After Earthquakes. Boulder, CO; Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. and P. Bolton. 1986. Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery. Boulder, CO; Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. and L. Stanford. 1991. “Shelter, Housing and Recovery: A Comparison of U.S. Disasters,” Disasters, 15 (1): 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D.S., S.E. Chang, H. Cochrane, R.A. Olson, A. Rose, and J. Steenson. 1997. “Direct and Indirect Economic Losses from Earthquake Damage,” Earthquake Spectra, 13 (4): 683–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.E. 2001. “Structural Change in Urban Economies: Recovery and Long-Term Impacts in the 1995 Kobe Earthquake,” The Kokumin Keizai Zasshi (Journal of Economics & Business Administration), 183 (1): 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.E., W.D. Svekla, and M. Shinozuka. 2002. “Linking Infrastructure and Urban Economy: Simulation of Water Disruption Impacts in Earthquakes,” Environment and Planning B, 29 (2): 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., P. Gordon, J.E. Moore II, H.W. Richardson, M. Shinozuka, and S.E. Chang. 2001. “Integrating Transportation Network and Regional Economic Models to Estimate the Costs of a Large Urban Earthquake,” Journal of Regional Science, 41 (1): 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, H.C. 1974. “Predicting the Economic Impact of Earthquakes,” Boulder, CO; Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Working Paper No.15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, M.E. 1984. “The Economic Recovery of Small Businesses after Earthquakes: The Coalinga Experience,” paper presented at the International Conference on Natural Hazards Mitigation Research and Practice, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., H.W. Richardson, and B. Davis. 1998. “Transport-Related Impacts of the Northridge Earthquake,” Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1 (2): 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, JE., R.W. Kates, and M. Bowden eds. 1977. Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Essex, UK; Addison Wesley Longman Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirayama, Y. 2000. “Collapse and Reconstruction: Housing Recovery Policy in Kobe after the Hanshin Great Earthquake,” Housing Studies, 15 (1): 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, S. J. 1980. “Reconstruction Following Seismic Disaster in Venzone, Friuli,” Disasters, 4 (2): 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, K. and T. Kanoh. 1990. “Evaluation of Indirect Economic Effects Caused by the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu, Japan Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, 6 (4): 739–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, C.A., J.D. Landis, Q. Shen, and S. Stryker. 1991. “Economic Impacts of the Loma Prieta Earthquake: A Focus on Small Businesses,” Berkeley, CA; University of California at Berkeley, U.C. Transportation Center and the Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, working paper #91–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S.B. and S.E. Chang. 2003. Urban Disaster Recovery: A Framework and Simulation Mode,. Technical Report MCEER-03–0005. Buffalo, NY; Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuyama, Y., G.J.D. Hewings, and M. Sonis. 2000. “Sequential Interindustry Model (SIM) and Impact Analysis: Application for Measuring Economic Impact of Unscheduled Events,” paper presented at the 47th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., J. Benavides, S.E. Chang, P. Szczesniak, and D. Lim. 1997. “The Regional Economic Impact of an Earthquake: Direct and Indirect Effects of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions,” Journal of Regional Science, 37 (3): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and G. Guha. 1999. “Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Electric Utility Lifeline Losses from Earthquakes,” paper presented at the 46th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, C. 1991. “Recovery from Disaster,” in T.E. Drabek and G.J. Hoetmer eds. Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government. Washington, DC; ICMA: 224–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, C.B. and R. Popkin. 1990. “Disaster Recovery after Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina,” Boulder, CO; Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, J., M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorenson. 1991. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ; Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. and J. M. Dahlhamer. 1998. “Business Disruption, Preparedness and Recovery: Lessons from the Northridge Earthquake,” NEHRP Conference and Workshop on Research on the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994. Richmond, CA; CUREe.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C.T. and D.G. Lenze. 1994. “Modeling the Regional Impact of Natural Disaster and Recovery: A General Framework and an Application to Hurricane Andrew,” International Regional Science Review, 17 (2): 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, S.E., Miles, S.B. (2004). The Dynamics of Recovery: A Framework. In: Okuyama, Y., Chang, S.E. (eds) Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24787-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24787-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05985-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24787-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics