Skip to main content

Minimum Common String Partition Problem: Hardness and Approximations

  • Conference paper
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3341))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

String comparison is a fundamental problem in computer science, with applications in areas such as computational biology, text processing or compression. In this paper we address the minimum common string partition problem, a string comparison problem with tight connection to the problem of sorting by reversals with duplicates, a key problem in genome rearrangement.

A partition of a string A is a sequence \({\mathcal P}=(P_{1},P_{2},...P_{m})\) of strings, called the blocks, whose concatenation is equal to A. Given a partition \({\mathcal P}\) of a string A and a partition \({\mathcal Q}\) of a string B, we say that the pair \(\langle\mathcal{P,Q}\rangle\) is a common partition of A and B if \({\mathcal Q}\) is a permutation of \({\mathcal P}\). The minimum common string partition problem (MCSP) is to find a common partition of two strings A and B with the minimum number of blocks. The restricted version of MCSP where each letter occurs at most k times in each input string, is denoted by k-MCSP.

In this paper, we show that 2-MCSP (and therefore MCSP) is NP-hard and, moreover, even APX-hard. We describe a 1.1037-approximation for 2-MCSP and a linear time 4-approximation algorithm for 3-MCSP. We are not aware of any better approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avidor, A., Zwick, U.: Approximating MIN k-SAT. In: Bose, P., Morin, P. (eds.) ISAAC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2518, pp. 465–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman, P., Karpinski, M.: On some tighter inapproximability results. In: Proc. of the of 26th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), pp. 200–209 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caprara, A.: Sorting by reversals is difficult. In: Proc. of the First International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 75–83 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X., Zheng, J., Fu, Z., Nan, P., Zhong, Y., Lonardi, S., Jiang, T.: Assignment of orthologous genes via genome rearrangement. Submitted (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christie, D.A., Irving, R.W.: Sorting strings by reversals and by transpositions. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 14(2), 193–206 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrobak, M., Kolman, P., Sgall, J.: The greedy algorithm for the minimum common string partition problem. In: Jansen, K., Khanna, S., Rolim, J.D.P., Ron, D. (eds.) RANDOM 2004 and APPROX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3122, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cormode, G., Muthukrishnan, S.: The string edit distance matching problem with moves. In: Proc. of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium On Discrete Mathematics (SODA), pp. 667–676 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hannenhalli, S., Pevzner, P.A.: Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. Journal of the ACM 46(1), 1–27 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Sankoff, D., El-Mabrouk, N.: Genome rearrangement. In: Jiang, T., Xu, Y., Zhang, M.Q. (eds.) Current Topics in Computational Molecular Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapira, D., Storer, J.A.: Edit distance with move operations. In: Apostolico, A., Takeda, M. (eds.) CPM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2373, p. 85. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Watterson, G.A., Ewens, W.J., Hall, T.E., Morgan, A.: The chromosome inversion problem. Journal of Theoretical Biology 99, 1–7 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goldstein, A., Kolman, P., Zheng, J. (2004). Minimum Common String Partition Problem: Hardness and Approximations. In: Fleischer, R., Trippen, G. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3341. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30551-4_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30551-4_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24131-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30551-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics