Skip to main content

Comparing the Succinctness of Monadic Query Languages over Finite Trees

  • Conference paper
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2803))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the succinctness of monadic second-order logic and a variety of monadic fixed point logics on trees. All these languages are known to have the same expressive power on trees, but some can express the same queries much more succinctly than others. For example, we show that, under some complexity theoretic assumption, monadic second-order logic is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic least fixed point logic, which in turn is non-elementarily more succinct than monadic datalog.

Succinctness of the languages is closely related to the combined and parameterized complexity of query evaluation for these languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Buneman, P., Suciu, D.: Data on the Web: From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Alechina, N., Immerman, N.: Reachability logic: An efficient fragment of transitive closure logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8(3), 325–338 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, M., Immerman, N.: An n! lower bound on formula size. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 197–206 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra, A., Harel, D.: Structure and complexity of relational queries. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 25, 99–128 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dantsin, E., Goerdt, A., Hirsch, E.A., Kannan, R., Kleinberg, J., Papadimitriou, C., Raghavan, P., Schöning, U.: A deterministic (2 −2/(k+1))n algorithm for k-SAT based on local search. Theoretical Computer Science 289(1), 69–83 (2002); Revised version of: Deterministic algorithms for k-SAT based on covering codes and local search. In: ICALP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1853 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J.: Finite model theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Etessami, K., Vardi, M.Y., Wilke, T.: First-order logic with two variables and unary temporal logic. Information and Computation 179(2), 279–295 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fagin, R.: Monadic generalized spectra. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der mathematik 21, 89–96 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Frick, M., Grohe, M.: The complexity of first-order and monadic second-order logic revisited. Journal version of LICS 2002 paper (2003), Available at http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/grohe/pub.html

  11. Frick, M., Grohe, M., Koch, C.: Query evaluation on compressed trees. In: 18th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2003), Ottawa, Canada (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez, M.F., Siméon, J., Wadler, P.: An algebra for XML query. In: Kapoor, S., Prasad, S. (eds.) FST TCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1974, pp. 11–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottlob, G., Koch, C.: Monadic datalog and the expressive power of web information extraction languages. Journal version of PODS 2002 paper. Available as CoRR report arXiv:cs.DB/0211020 (November 2002) (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grädel, E., Otto, M.: On Logics with Two Variables. Theoretical Computer Science 224, 73–113 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Grohe, M., Schweikardt, N.: Comparing the succinctness of monadic query languages over finite trees. Technical Report EDI-INF-RR-0168, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hosoya, H., Pierce, B.C.: XDuce: A typed XML processing language (preliminary report). In: Suciu, D., Vossen, G. (eds.) WebDB 2000. LNCS, vol. 1997, p. 226. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Immerman, N.: Descriptive complexity. Springer, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamp, H.: Tense Logic and the theory of linear order. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koch, C.: Efficient processing of expressive node-selecting queries on XML data in secondary storage: A tree-automata based approach. In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Very Large Data Bases (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neven, F.: Design and Analysis of Query Languages for Structured Documents – A Formal and Logical Approach. PhD thesis, Limburgs Universitair Centrum (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neven, F., Schwentick, T.: Query automata over finite trees. Theoretical Computer Science 275(1-2), 633–674 (2002); Journal version of PODS 2000 paper

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, W.: Languages, automata, and logic. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of formal languages, vol. 3, Springer, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about the past with two-way automata. In: Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., Winskel, G. (eds.) ICALP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1443, pp. 628–641. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilke, T.: CTL+ is exponentially more succinct than CTL. In: Pandu Rangan, C., Raman, V., Sarukkai, S. (eds.) FST TCS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1738, pp. 110–121. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grohe, M., Schweikardt, N. (2003). Comparing the Succinctness of Monadic Query Languages over Finite Trees. In: Baaz, M., Makowsky, J.A. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45220-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45220-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45220-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics