There is a variety of interpretative frameworks for giving meaning to FTA activities (see Barré and Keenan in this volume). In this contribution we would like to explore an interpretation of Foresight from the perspective of the interdisciplinary body of knowledge that has become known as STS — Science and Technology Studies (c.f. Jasanoff et al. 1994). Drawing in particular on STS insights on the “social shaping of technology”, we would like to investigate the possibility of Foresight to support policy makers in influencing innovation trajectories according to societal needs.
The study of technological developments is a complex issue. First of all, technologies are not given in nature, but man-made constructs; they are the products of cultural evolution. The various actors involved may use different definitions of technology. Furthermore, technologies are continuously evolving in a social context. With the further development of technologies, their definitions and relevant perspectives may also have to change. These definitions and perspectives, however, are basic to the discursive traditions studying technology and its relevant contexts. We distinguish several perspectives in the study of technology: STS dealing with social and economic co-evolution of technology, and science and technology (S&T) policy analysis and R&D management through foresight. We argue that the combination of these three perspectives challenges us to consider technological change as a complex and reflexive process. From this combined perspective, it is implied that taking a holistic view on the future by looking at societal and technological elements together and aligning or even integrating companies and users visions on the future is not at all an easy thing to do. To actually develop socio-technical future visions Foresight needs to look at societal development and technological possibilities with the same degree of openness and expertise. STS results may give some indications for Foresight practice aiming to adopt such a holistic approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Akrich, (1992) Beyond social construction of technology: The shaping of people and things in the innovation process, in M. Dierkes and U. Hoffmann (eds.) New Technology at the Outset: Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations, Campus/Westview, Frankfurt/NY, Chapter 9, pp. 173-190
W.B. Arthur, (1988) Competing technologies: An overview, in G.C. Dosi, R. Freeman, N.G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London
W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, T.J. Pinch (eds.) (1987) The social construction of technological systems - New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA
W. Bijker, J. Law (eds.) (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-Technical Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA, London
M. Borup, N. Brown, K. Konrad, H. Van Lente (2006) The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Stategic Management, Vol. 18, No. 3/4, pp. 285-298, July-September
S. Collinson (1993) Managing product innovation at Sony: the development of the Data Discman. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 285-306
R. Cowan (1992) High technology and the economics of standardization Chap. 14, pp. 279-300, in M. Dierkes and U. Hoffmann, (eds.), New Technologies at the Outset - Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations, Campus/Westview
A.P. David (1985) Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, Vol. 75, pp. 332-337
G. Dosi (1982) Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants of Technological Change. Research Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 147-162
F.W. Geels (2004) Processes and Patterns in Transitions and System Innovations: Refining the Co-Evolutionary Multi-Level Perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 72, pp. 681-696
F.W. Geels (2002a) Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Process: A Multi Level Perspective and a Case Study. Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 1257-1274
F.W. Geels (2002b) Towards sociotechnical scenarios and reflexive anticipation: using patterns and regularities in technology dynamics. in KH Sørensen and R Williams (eds.) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces & Tools, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 359-385
F.W. Geels, W.A. Smit (2000) Failed Technology Futures: Pitfalls and Lessons from a Historical Survey. Future, Vol. 32, pp. 867-885
L. Georghiou (2001) Third generation foresight - integrating the socio-economic dimension, In Technology Foresight - The Approach to and Potential for New Technology Foresight, Proceedings of the International Conference on technology Foresight, NISTEP Research Material, vol. 77 2001 (March)
M. Hård (1993) Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology Science. Technology & Human Values, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 408-432
M. Hård (1994) Technology as Practice: Local and Global Closure Processes in Diesel Engine Design. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 24, No. 3 (August), pp. 549-585
M. Hård (2002) Cultural Politics in Action: Developing User Scripts in Relation to the Electric Vehicle. Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 262-281
A. Havas (2005) Terminology and Methodology for Benchmarking Foresight Programmes, Prepared for the For Society project, Tasks 1.4 and 3.1
S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen and T. Pinch, (eds.) (1994) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi
R, Kemp (1994) Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability: the Problem of Technological Regime Shifts. Futures, Vol. 26, pp. 1023-1046
R. Kemp, J. Schot, R. Hoogma, (1998) Regime Shifts to Sustainability through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 10, 175-195
K. Konrad, (2004) Prägende Erwartungen. Szenarien als Schrittmacher der Technikentwicklung edition sigma, Berlin
T. Könnölä, V. Brummer, A. Salo, (2006) Diversity in Foresight: Insights from the fostering of Innovation Ideas, Helsinki University of Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory, Research Report E19
R. Kline, T. Pinch (1996) Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States. Technology & Culture, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 763-795
S. Kuhlmann (2001) Management of Innovation Systems the role of Distributed intelligence, Maklu-Uitgevers, Antwer
B. Latour (1983) Give me a laboratory and i will raise the World, in Knorr-Cetina, M. & Mulkay, M. (eds.), Science Observed, Sage, London, pp. 141-70
B. Latour (1986) Science in Action, Open University Press, Milton Keynes
B. Latour (1988) How to write “The Prince” for Machines as well as Machinations, in B. Elliot (ed.) Technology and Social Change, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 20-43
J. Law, M. Callon, (1992) The life and death of an aircraft: a network analysis of technological change, in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-Technical Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA, London, pp. 29-52
L. Leydesdorff (1997) The Non-linear Dynamics of Sociological Reflections. International Sociology, Vol. 12, pp. 25-45
B-Å Lundvall, S Borrás (1998): The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy Brussels: Commission of the EU. (170 pages). http://www.cordis.lu/tser/src/globec.htm
D. MacKenzie, J. Wajcman, (eds.) (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its HUM, Open University Press, Milton Keynes
B.R. Martin, R. Johnston (1999) Technology Foresight for Wiring Up the National Innovation System. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 60, pp. 37-54
N. Oudshoorn, T. Pinch, (2003) (eds.) How Users matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, London
A. Rip, J.W. Schot (2002) Identifying loci for influencing the dynamics of technological development, in K.H. Sorensen, R. Williams (eds.) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces & Tools, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK pp.155-172
J. Rotmans, R. Kemp, M. van Asselt (2001) More Evolution than Revolution. Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 15-31
S. Russel, R. Williams (2002) Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy, in K.H. Sørensen, R. Williams (eds.) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces & Tools, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
A. Salo, K. Cuhls (2003) Technology Foresight - Past and Future. Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 22, pp. 79-82
R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann (2004) The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1 No. 1/2, pp. 4-32
K.H. Sørensen, R. Williams (eds.) (2002) Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces & Tools, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
P. Swann (1990) Standards and the growth of a software network, in J.L. Berg, H. Schumny (eds.) An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process, Elsevier Science/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 383-393
A. Tubke, K, Ducatel, J. Gavigan, P. Moncada (eds.) (2001) Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Perspectives, IPTS, Seville
B. van der Meulen (2003) Integrating technological and societal aspects of ICT in Foresight Exercises Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis Nr. 2, 12. Jg., Juni 2003 pp. 66-74
H. Van Lente (1993) Promising Technology - The dynamics of Expectations in technological Developments, Eburon, Enschede
M Weber (2006) Foresight and Adaptive Planning as Complementary Elements in Anticipatory Policy-making: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach, in J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, R. Kemp (eds.) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 189-222
A. Webster (2002) Response to Prof. Remi Barre’s Foresight and Their Themes, Paper presented at The Role of Foresight in the Selection of Research Priorities hosted by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, May
R. Williams, D. Edge (1996) The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 856-899
S. Woolgar (1991) Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warnke, P., Heimeriks, G. (2008). Technology Foresight as Innovation Policy Instrument: Learning from Science and Technology Studies. In: Cagnin, C., Keenan, M., Johnston, R., Scapolo, F., Barré, R. (eds) Future-Oriented Technology Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68811-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68811-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68809-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68811-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)