Skip to main content

Revegetation and the Significance of Timelags in Provision of Habitat Resources for Birds

  • Chapter
Book cover Landscape Analysis and Visualisation

Abstract

In many approaches to landscape visualisation and reconstruction for biodiversity management, vegetation is represented as being either present or absent. Revegetation is assumed to be possible, and new vegetation appears ‘immediately’ in a mature state, which is likely to drastically overestimate habitat suitability in the short-term. We constructed a simple temporal model of resource provision from revegetated agricultural land to estimate habitat suitability indices for woodland birds in south-eastern Australia. We used this model to illustrate the trajectory of change in biodiversity benefits of revegetation. As vegetation matures, its suitability for a given species changes, so a time-integrated assessment of habitat value is needed. Spatial allocation strategies, such as offsets, that may provide high value habitat in the long-term but imply shorter term population bottlenecks from a paucity of key resources (e.g. tree hollows) must be avoided. Given that vegetation may not meet both foraging and breeding requirements of a given species, populations may be limited continuously — by foraging constraints at some times, and by breeding constraints at other times. Animal species differ in their resource requirements so that optimisation involves compromises among species. Temporal processes associated with revegetation and differences in resource requirements of species complicate landscape reconstruction. Nevertheless, our analyses suggest that the time-course of vegetation development must be incorporated in models for optimising landscape reconstruction and for calculating revegetation offsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrett G, Silcocks A, Barry S, Cunningham R, Poulter R (2003) The new atlas of Australian birds. Birds Australia (Royal Australian Ornithologists Union), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, R Mac Nally (2004) Identifying priority areas for conservation action in agricultural landscapes. Pacific Conservation Biology 10:106–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevers M, Hof J (1999) Spatially optimising wildlife habitat edge effects in forest management linear and mixed integer programs. Forest Science 45:249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakers M, Davies SJJF, Reilly PN (1984) Atlas of Australian birds. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Chippendale GM, Hall N, Hyland BPM, Johnston RD, Kleinig DA, Turner JD (1984) Forest trees of Australia, 4th edn. Nelson/ CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resourcebased concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrough J, Vesk PA, Moll J (2008) Integrating ecological uncertainty and farmscale economics when planning restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler M, Burgman MA (2004) Combining population viability analysis with decision analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emison W, Bennett S, Beardsell C, Norman F, Loyn R (1987) Atlas of Victorian birds. Birds Australia, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger D, Harvey J, Drew A (2004) Predicting the biodiversity benefits of the Saltshaker Project, Boorowa, NSW. Ecological Management and Restoration 5:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Boak M (2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Management and Restoration 3:205– 210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2002) Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecological Management and Restoration 8:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Garman SL, Marks B, Urban DL (1993) An approach for managing vertebrate diversity across multiple use landscapes. Ecological Applications 3:481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Hopkins AJM (1990) From frontier to fragmentation: European impact on Australia’s vegetation. In: Saunders D, Hobbs RJ, Hopkins AJM (eds) Australian ecosystems: 200 years of utilisation, degradation and reconstruction. Ecological Society of Australia, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett A (2007) A review of the focal species approach in Australia. Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2003) Climate change and Australia: trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecology 28:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L, Cawsey EM, Westoby M (1996) Climatic range sizes of Eucalyptus species in relation to future climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 5:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxel GR, Hastings A (1999) Habitat loss, fragmentation, and restoration. Restoration Ecology 7:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Dickman CR (1998) The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation 7:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt ID, Bennett AF (2000) Temperate woodlands in Victoria: distribution, composition and conservation. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CY (eds) Temperate Eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt ID, Jones N, Spooner PG, Petrow M (2006) Effects of European colonisation on indigenous ecosystems: post-settlement changes in tree stand structures in Eucalyptus-Callitris woodlands in central New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Biogeography 33:1102–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R (2007) Use of the abundance spectrum and relative-abundance distributions to analyze assemblage change in massively altered landscapes. American Naturalist 170:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R (2008) The lag dæmon: hysteresis in rebuilding landscapes and implications for biodiversity futures. Journal of Environmental Management doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.1006.1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R, Horrocks G (2002) Relative influences of patch, landscape and historical factors on birds in an Australian fragmented landscape. Journal of Biogeography 29:395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally RC, Bennett AF, Horrocks G (2000) Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box-ironbark forests of central Victoria. Australia. Biological Conservation 95:7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant S, Higgins PJ (1990–2002) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Garza C, Howe HF (2003) Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, van Teeffelen A, Ben-Haim Y, Ferrier S (in press) How much compensation is enough? Explicit incorporation of uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restoration Ecology

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell TJ, Jackson LE, Brooks RP (2000) Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the central Appalachians. Ecological Applications 10:1706– 21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzey G, Doyle R (1980) A field guide to the birds of Australia. Collins, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Prober SM, Thiele KR, Lunt ID (2002) Identifying ecological barriers to restoration in temperate grassy woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states. Australian Journal of Botany 50:699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford JQ, Bennett AF (2007) The relative importance of landscape properties for woodland birds in agricultural environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:737–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford JQ, Bennett AF, Cheers GJ (2005) Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biological Conservation 124:317–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recher HF (1999) The state of Australia’s avifauna: a personal opinion and prediction for the new millennium. Australian Zoologist 31:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards SA, Possingham HP, Tizard J (1999) Optimal fire management for maintaining community diversity. Ecological Applications 9:880–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Traill BJ (1996) Conserving woodland birds in the wheat and sheep belts of southern Australia. Royal Australasian Ornitholoists Union Conservation Statement 10, Supplement to Wingspan 6(2), Royal Australian Ornithological Union, Melbourne, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring DA, Bevers M, Kennedy JOS, Harley D (2001) Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: A reappraisal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:1992–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer J, Field J (2000). The cost of revegetation, final report to Environment Australia. Australian National University Forestry, and Greening Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (1995) Habitat reconstruction: the revegetation imperative. In: Bradstock RA, Auld TD, Keith DA, Kingsford RT, Lunney D, Sivertsen DP (eds), Conserving biodiversity; threats and solutions. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JR, Mac Nally R, Fleishman E, Horrocks G (2007) Predicting bird species distributions in reconstructed landscapes. Conservation Biology 21:752– 66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski MK, Fahrig L, Merriam G (1999) Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9:586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Dorrough JW (2006) Getting trees on farms the easy way? Lessons from a model of eucalypt regeneration on pastures. Australian Journal of Botany 54:509–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Mac Nally R (2006) Changes in vegetation structure and distribution in rural landscapes: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112:356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Nolan R, Thomson JR, Dorrough JW, Mac Nally R (2008) Time lags in provision of habitat resources through revegetation. Biological Conservation 141:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J, Freudenberger D, Paull D (2001) An assessment of the focal-species approach for conserving birds in variegated landscapes in south-eastern Australia. Conservation Biology 15:364–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal MI, Possingham HP (2003) Applying a decision-theory framework to landscape planning for biodiversity: follow-up to Watson et al. Conservation Biology 17:327–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal MI, Field SA, Possingham HP (2007) Optimising landscape configuration: a case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:6–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Bennett AF (1999) Patchiness of a floral resource: Flowering of red ironbark E. tricarpa in a box and ironbark forest. Victorian Naturalist 116:48– 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodgate P, Black P (1988) Forest cover changes in Victoria 1869–1987. Victorian Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vesk, P.A., Nally, R.M., Thomson, J.R., Horrocks, G. (2008). Revegetation and the Significance of Timelags in Provision of Habitat Resources for Birds. In: Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D., Duncan, D. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Visualisation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69168-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics