Skip to main content

Towards Adaptive Management of Native Vegetation in Regional Landscapes

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Landscape modellers are now capable of combining high resolution spatial data with process models to explore natural resource management scenarios at scales appropriate for decision making, but what of the process of decision making itself? In this chapter we review the applicability of the ‘adaptive management’ paradigm to natural resource management, using regional management of native vegetation by Catchment Management Authorities as an example. We find that progress has been made in the approach to defining management objectives and specifying assumptions behind vegetation change models; however, there remain significant challenges in instituting true management experiments and identifying performance indicators appropriate to support continuous learning. We argue that the ecological and institutional complexity of native vegetation management reinforces the importance of systematic decision protocols. Adaptive management is the most logical approach to decision making where there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of management options, and the opportunity exists to learn and update understanding. This iterative process offers continuous improvements to investment efficiency in native vegetation management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: Why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 36:414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANAO (2008) Regional delivery model for the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. ANAO Audit Report No. 21, 2007–08. Australian National Audit Office, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann BT, Cunningham PG, Gordon JC (1996) Best management practices, adaptive management, or both? In: Proceedings of the National Society of American Foresters Convention, 28 October–1 November 1995, Portland, Maine, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunt K, McLennan R (2006) Biodiversity monitoring action plan. Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, Shepparton, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: A practical information- theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1992) National forest policy statement. a new focus for Australia’s forests. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1996) National strategy for the conservation of Australia’s biodiversity. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1998) A framework of regional (sub-national) level criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • DNRE (1997) Victoria’s Biodiversity: Directions in Management. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • DNRE (2002) Victoria’s native vegetation management: a framework for action. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrough J, Vesk PA, Moll J (2008) Incorporating ecological uncertainty and farm-scale economics when planning restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DSE (2006) Native vegetation gain approach – technical basis for calculating gains through improved native vegetation management and revegetation. Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • ESCAVI (2007) An interim approach to the native vegetation condition indicator. Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • GBCMA (2003) Goulburn Broken regional catchment strategy. Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, Benalla, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber LR, Beger M, McCarthy MA, Possingham HP (2005) A theory for optimal monitoring of marine reserves. Ecology Letters 8:829–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin NRM (1999) Native vegetation national overview. Report for Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council. Environment Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser CE, Pople AR, Possingham HP (2006) Should managed populations be monitored every year? Ecological Applications 16:807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RW, Bormann BT, Lee DC, Martin JR (2006) Northwest Forest Plan – the first 10 years (1993–2003): synthesis of monitoring and research results. PNW-GTR-651, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BL (1999) The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies. Conservation Ecology 3:Article 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FA, Moore CT, Kendall WT, Dubovsky JA, Caithamer DF, Kelley JR, Williams BK (1997) Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith D, Gorrod E (2006) The meanings of vegetation condition. Ecological Management and Restoration 7:7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2001) On the maturing of restoration: Linking ecological research and restoration. Ecological Management and Restoration 2:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, McCarthy MA (2006) Evaluation of PVA models of arboreal marsupials. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:4079–4096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA, Possingham HP (2007) Active adaptive management for conservation. Conservation Biology 21:956–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith C (1997) Best practice in performance reporting in natural resource management. ANZECC Working Group on National Parks and Protected Area Management – Benchmarking and Best Practice Program. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Port Melbourne, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCMA (2003) North Central regional catchment strategy 2003–2007. North Central Catchment Management Authority, Huntly, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • NECMA (2003) North East Regional Catchment Strategy, North East Catchment Management Authority, Wodonga, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • NECMA (2006a) Annual report 2005/2006. North East Catchment Management Authority, Wodonga, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • NECMA (2006b) Catchment condition report 2005/2006. North East Catchment Management Authority, Wodonga, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell G, White M, Griffioen P, Conroy M (2006) Vegetation condition mapping at a landscape-scale across Victoria. Ecological Management and Restoration 7:S65–S68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:668–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRMMC (2002a) National framework for natural resource management standards and targets. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • NRMMC (2002b) National natural resource management monitoring and evaluation framework. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes D, Lyon P (2006) Towards a national approach to vegetation condition assessment that meets government investors’ needs: A policy perspective. Ecological Management and Restoration 7:S3–S5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes D, Newell G, Cheal D (2003) Assessing the quality of native vegetation: The ‘habitat hectares’ approach. Ecological Management and Restoration, 4:S29–S38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP (2001) The business of biodiversity: Applying decision theory principles to nature conservation. Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Mann S (1998) Effects of grazing, fencing and licensing on the natural values of Crown Land frontages in the Goulburn Broken catchment. Goulburn Valley Environment Group, Shepparton, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith FP (forthcoming) Who’s planting what, where and why – and who’s paying? An analysis of farmland revegetation in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Bormann BT, Ryan C, Shindler B, Sturtevan V, Clark RN, Philpot C (2003) Adaptive management and the Northwest forest plan; rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry 101:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchmann ET (1998) The Northwest forest plan: A Report to the President and Congress. DIANE Publishing, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1994) On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (1999) Adaptive harvest management – 1999 duck-hunting season. US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • VCMC (2007) Catchment condition report 2007. Victorian Catchment Management Council, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Government (1994) Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994. No. 52, Parliament of Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCMA (2007) Annual report 2006–2007. Wimmera Catchment Management Authority, Horsham, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintle BA, McCarthy MA, Volinsky CT, Kavanagh RP (2003) The use of Bayesian Model averaging to better represent the uncertainty in ecological models. Conservation Biology 17:1579–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodgate PW, Peel WD, Ritman KT, Coram JE, Brady A, Rule AJ, Banks JCG (1994) A study of the old growth forests of East Gippsland. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Melbourne, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duncan, D.H., Wintle, B.A. (2008). Towards Adaptive Management of Native Vegetation in Regional Landscapes. In: Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D., Duncan, D. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Visualisation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69168-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics