Skip to main content

Towards Self-configuration in Autonomic Electronic Institutions

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II (COIN 2006)

Abstract

Electronic institutions (EIs) have been proposed as a means of regulating open agent societies. EIs define the rules of the game in agent societies by fixing what agents are permitted and forbidden to do and under what circumstances. And yet, there is the need for EIs to adapt their regulations to comply with their goals despite coping with varying populations of self-interested agents. In this paper we focus on the extension of EIs with autonomic capabilities to allow them to yield a dynamical answer to changing circumstances through the adaptation of their norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmott, S.: Agentlink Roadmap. Agenlink.org (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. IIIA PhD Monography, vol. 19 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jennings, N.R., Sycara, K., Wooldridge, M.: A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 1, 275–306 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noriega, P.: Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. IIIA Phd Monography, vol. 8 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18, 191–204 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. North, D.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economics Perfomance. Cambridge U. P., Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Etzioni, A.: Modern Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing action and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17, 301–321 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Q.: A Simulation Laboratory for Evaluation of Dynamic Traffic Management Systems. PhD thesis, MIT (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luke, S., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Panait, L., Sullivan, K.: Mason: A new multi-agent simulation toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SwarmFest Workshop, p. 8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. López-Sánchez, M., Noria, X., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Gilbert, N.: Multi-agent based simulation of news digital markets. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications 2(1), 7–14 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wall, M.: GAlib, A C++ Library of Genetic Algorithm Components. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), http://lancet.mit.edu/ga/

  14. Excelente-Toledo, C.B., Jennings, N.R.: The dynamic selection of coordination mechanisms. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 9(1-2), 55–85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Using the \(\mathcal{M}\)oise+ for a cooperative framework of mas reorganisation. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gasser, L., Ishida, T.: A dynamic organizational architecture for adaptive problem solving. In: Proc. of AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA, pp. 185–190 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ishida, T., Yokoo, M.: Organization self-design of distributed production systems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 4(2), 123–134 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horling, B., Benyo, B., Lesser, V.: Using Self-Diagnosis to Adapt Organizational Structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 529–536 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norman, T.J., Preece, A., Chalmers, S., Jennings, N.R., Luck, M., Dang, V.D., Nguyen, T.D., Deora, V., Shao, J., Gray, W.A., Fiddian, N.J.: Conoise: Agent-based formation of virtual organisations. In: Gedeon, T.D., Fung, L.C.C. (eds.) AI 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2903, pp. 353–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 1–15 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. López-López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Alonso, E., Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 674–681. ACM Press, New York, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Redesign of organizations as a basis for organizational change. LNCS, vol. 4386, pp. 51–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fitoussi, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Choosing social laws for multi-agent systems: Minimality and simplicity. Artificial Intelligence 119(1-2), 61–101 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Dresner, K., Stone, P.: Multiagent traffic management: An improved intersection control mechanism. In: The 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 471–477. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Doniec, A., Espié, S., Mandiau, R., Piechowiak, S.: Dealing with multi-agent coordination by anticipation: Application to the traffic simulation at junctions. In: EUMAS, pp. 478–479 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Montana, D.J., Czerwinski, S.: Evolving control laws for a network of traffic signals. In: Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference, Stanford University, CA, USA, pp. 333–338. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Adaptation of Autonomic Electronic Institutions through norms and institutional agents. In: ESAW 2006. 7th Annual International Workshop Engineering Societies in the Agents World, pp. 137–152 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pablo Noriega Javier Vázquez-Salceda Guido Boella Olivier Boissier Virginia Dignum Nicoletta Fornara Eric Matson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. (2007). Towards Self-configuration in Autonomic Electronic Institutions. In: Noriega, P., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II. COIN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4386. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74459-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74459-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74457-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74459-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics