Abstract
Different organizations or organizational units are likely to store and maintain different types of information about their software architectures. This inhibits effective management of architectural knowledge. We experimented with a model of architectural knowledge to characterize the use of architectural knowledge in four different organizations. Based on this experimentation we identified four perspectives on architectural knowledge management, and additionally adjusted the model to better align theory with practice. The refined model defines a minimal set of concepts with supposedly complete coverage of the architectural knowledge domain. Because of the minimalistic aspect of the model, we refer to it as a ‘core model’ of architectural knowledge. Supporting evidence for the validity of our model, i.e. the supposed complete coverage, has been obtained by an attempt to falsify this claim through a comparison with selected literature. Application of the core model to characterize the use of architectural knowledge indicates possible areas of improvement for architectural knowledge management in the four organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley Pearson Education, Boston (2003)
Ali Babar, M., Gorton, I., Jeffery, R.: Capturing and Using Software Architecture Knowledge for Architecture-Based Software Development. In: 5th International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 169–176 (2005)
Bosch, J.: Software Architecture: The Next Step. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B., Morrison, R. (eds.) EWSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3047, pp. 194–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Building up and Reasoning about Architectural Knowledge. In: Hofmeister, C., Crnkovic, I., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4214, pp. 39–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Shaw, M., Clements, P.: The Golden Age of Software Architecture. IEEE Software 23(2), 31–39 (2006)
Tyree, J., Akerman, A.: Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture. IEEE Software 22(2), 19–27 (2005)
van der Ven, J.S., Jansen, A., Nijhuis, J., Bosch, J.: Design decisions: The Bridge between Rationale and Architecture. In: Dutoit, A. (ed.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, pp. 329–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Tang, A., Ali Babar, M., Gorton, I., Han, J.: A Survey of the Use and Documentation of Architecture Design Rationale. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 89–98 (2005)
Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Software Architecture as a Set of Architectural Design Decisions. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 109–120 (2005)
Wang, Z., Sherdil, K., Madhavji, N.H.: ACCA: An Architecture-centric Concern Analysis Method. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 99–108 (2005)
Hofmeister, C., Kruchten, P., Nord, R.L., Obbink, H., Ran, A., America, P.: Generalizing a Model of Software Architecture Design from Five Industrial Approaches. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 77–86 (2005)
Akerman, A., Tyree, J.: Position on Ontology-Based Architecture. In: 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 289–290 (2005)
Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., Nielsen, P.A.: Action Research. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 94–97 (1999)
de Boer, R.C., Farenhorst, R., van der Ven, J.S., Clerc, V., Deckers, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Structuring Software Architecture Project Memories. In: 8th International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations (LSO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 39–47 (2006)
IEEE: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. Standard 1471-2000, IEEE (2000)
Object Management Group: Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification. Technical Report formal/05-01-06, Object Management Group (2005)
ISO/IEC: Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model. Technical Report ISO/IEC 9126-1, ISO/IEC (2001)
Kruchten, P.: An Ontology of Architectural Design Decisions in Software-Intensive Systems. In: 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability Management, Groningen, The Netherlands (2004)
Farenhorst, R., de Boer, R.C.: Core Concepts of an Ontology of Architectural Design Decisions. Technical Report IR-IMSE-002, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2006)
Gorton, I.: Essential Software Architecture. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Zhuge, H.: The Knowledge Grid. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Boer, R.C., Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Clerc, V., Jansen, A. (2007). Architectural Knowledge: Getting to the Core. In: Overhage, S., Szyperski, C.A., Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A. (eds) Software Architectures, Components, and Applications. QoSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4880. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77619-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77619-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77617-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77619-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)