Skip to main content

Representing Excuses in Social Dependence Networks

  • Conference paper
AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5883))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a representation of excuses in the context of multiagent systems. We distinguish five classes of excuses, taking as starting point both jurisprudential and philosophical studies about this topic, and we discuss their acceptance criteria. We highlight the following classes of excuses: epistemic excuses, power-based excuses, norm-based excuses, counts as-based excuses and social-based excuses and we represent them using social dependence networks. The acceptance criteria individuate those excuses which success in maintaining the trust of the other agents, e.g. in the context of social networks, excuses based on norms seem better than counts as-based ones in achieving this aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J.L.: A plea for excuses. Philosophical Papers (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Social viewpoints for arguing about coalitions. In: Bui, T.D., Ho, T.V., Ha, Q.-T. (eds.) PRIMA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5357, pp. 66–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8(3), 203–236 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caire, P., Villata, S., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Conviviality masks in multiagent systems. In: Padgham, L., Parkes, D.C., Müller, J., Parsons, S. (eds.) AAMAS (3), pp. 1265–1268. IFAAMAS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCullough, M., Worthington, E.L., Rachal, K.C.: Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 321–336 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, P.H.: Criminal law defenses: A systematic analysis. Columbia Law Review (199) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sichman, J.S., Conte, R.: Multi-agent dependence by dependence graphs. In: AAMAS, pp. 483–490. ACM, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasalou, A., Hopfensitz, A., Pitt, J.V.: In praise of forgiveness: Ways for repairing trust breakdowns in one-off online interactions. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 66, 466–480 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Villata, S.: Institutional social dynamic dependence networks. In: Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., Singh, M.P., Verhagen, H. (eds.) NORMAS, pp. 201–215 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boella, G., Broersen, J., van der Torre, L., Villata, S. (2009). Representing Excuses in Social Dependence Networks. In: Serra, R., Cucchiara, R. (eds) AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10290-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10291-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics