Skip to main content

Elder Abuse: A Human Rights Agenda for the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond Elder Law

Abstract

Only relatively recently has elder abuse has been recognised by governments as a major social problem. For too long it has been hidden and ignored. Even now it has been accepted as an issue requiring state attention, many countries are still struggling to find the correct legal response. Elder abuse, it has been claimed, has reached the position domestic violence did several decades ago. There is now an acceptance of the problem and that something needs to be done, but there is much dispute over what the correct response is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    House of Commons Health Committee, Elder Abuse (The Stationery Office, 2004), at 1.

  2. 2.

    District Judge Marilyn Mornington, Responding to Elder Abuse (Age Concern, 2004).

  3. 3.

    World Health Organisation (2002).

  4. 4.

    E.g. Dixon et al. (2010).

  5. 5.

    Brammer and Biggs (1998).

  6. 6.

    Hawks (2006).

  7. 7.

    House of Commons Health Committee, Elder Abuse (The Stationery Office, 2004), at 1.

  8. 8.

    McCreadie (2002).

  9. 9.

    McCreadie (1996).

  10. 10.

    For a discussion of the benefits of a single definition see O’Connor and Rowe (2005).

  11. 11.

    Phillipson and Biggs (1995), at 202.

  12. 12.

    World Health Organisation (2002).

  13. 13.

    There is, for example, no requirement that the act is unjustified.

  14. 14.

    Brandl and Meuer (2001).

  15. 15.

    Department of Health (2000).

  16. 16.

    Dixon et al. (2010).

  17. 17.

    Madden Dempsey (2006). See also Madden Dempsey (2009a).

  18. 18.

    This includes the location of the violence (the home) and the relationship between the parties (an intimate or familial one).

  19. 19.

    She defines these (at 314) as ‘social structures that sustain or perpetuate the uneven distribution of social power’. See also Johnson (1995).

  20. 20.

    For further discussion, including some concerns with the detail of that approach see Herring (2011a).

  21. 21.

    O’Keeffe et al. (2008). See also Mowlam et al. (2008) and Cooper et al. (2008).

  22. 22.

    The report explains (at 3) “’mistreatment’ is used to describe both abuse and neglect. There are four types of abuse: psychological, physical and sexual abuse (sometimes referred to collectively as ‘interpersonal abuse’) and financial abuse.”

  23. 23.

    O’Keeffe et al. (2008), at 4.

  24. 24.

    Ibid, para. 7.4

  25. 25.

    Hussein et al. (2007).

  26. 26.

    Cooper et al. (2008).

  27. 27.

    Choudhry and Herring (2006).

  28. 28.

    L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, Sect. 36, Reports 1998-III.

  29. 29.

    Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Sect. 115, Reports 1998-VIII.

  30. 30.

    Opuz v Turkey [2009] ECHR 33401/02.

  31. 31.

    Para. 129.

  32. 32.

    Ilascu and others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, 08 July 2004, para. 440.

  33. 33.

    Ireland v. the United Kingdom 2 EHRR 25.

  34. 34.

    See Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, paras. 24–30 and Valašinas v. Lithuania [2001] ECHR 479.

  35. 35.

    Campbell and Cosans v. UK (1982) 4 EHRR 293; Tyrer v. UK (1978) 2 EHRR 1.

  36. 36.

    Pretty v. UK, [2002] ECHR 423, at para. 52

  37. 37.

    Wolf (1997).

  38. 38.

    Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, judgment of 10 February 1983, Series A, no. 58, para. 22.

  39. 39.

    A v UK [1998] 3 FCR 597, E v UK [2002] 3 FCR 700.

  40. 40.

    Z v UK [2001] 2 FCR 246.

  41. 41.

    A v UK [1998] 3 FCR 597, para. 24.

  42. 42.

    Z v UK [2001] 2 FCR 246, para. 73.

  43. 43.

    E v UK [2002] 3 FCR 700.

  44. 44.

    A v UK [1998] 3 FCR 597, para. 20.

  45. 45.

    See Choudhry and Herring (2010), ch. 8 and 9.

  46. 46.

    E v UK [2002] 3 FCR 700.

  47. 47.

    MC v Bulgaria (2005) 40 EHRR 20.

  48. 48.

    MC v Bulgaria (2005) 40 EHRR 20.

  49. 49.

    [2009] ECHR 33401/02.

  50. 50.

    Para. 143.

  51. 51.

    Addo and Grief (1998).

  52. 52.

    Although the state may argue that the victim’s views make it unreasonable for the state to intervene.

  53. 53.

    E v UK [2002] 3 FCR 700.

  54. 54.

    Choudhry and Herring (2007).

  55. 55.

    Herring and Taylor (2006); Choudhry and Fenwick (2005).

  56. 56.

    This seeks to develop a dicta of Lord in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1AC 593 at para. 17, which refers to the need to consider the values underlying the right when considering cases of clashing rights.

  57. 57.

    Williams (2008).

  58. 58.

    For example, Da Silva Mouta v Portugal (2001) 31 EHRR 47 added sexual orientation to the list.

  59. 59.

    Rutherford (No 2) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2006] UKHL 19.

  60. 60.

    For further discussion see Choudhry and Herring (2010), chapter 2.

  61. 61.

    CPS (2010).

  62. 62.

    Salari (2006).

  63. 63.

    Giles et al. (1993).

  64. 64.

    Fitzgerald (2006).

  65. 65.

    Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000).

  66. 66.

    Schuyler and Liang (2006).

  67. 67.

    Department of Health (2005).

  68. 68.

    Quinn and Tomita (1986).

  69. 69.

    Social Exclusion Unit (2005).

  70. 70.

    Straka and Montminy (2006).

  71. 71.

    But see Pritchard (2001).

  72. 72.

    Whittaker (1996).

  73. 73.

    See Madden Dempsey (2009b), chapter 7, for an excellent discussion of the intersection of different forces in the context of domestic violence.

  74. 74.

    Aitken and Griffin (1996), chapter 3.

  75. 75.

    Turell (2000); Levit (2002).

  76. 76.

    Manthorpe (2006).

  77. 77.

    See Herring (2010), chapter 10 for a detailed discussion.

  78. 78.

    National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, section 47 gives a right to be assessed if one is in need and Mental Health Act 1983, s. 135 gives an approved social worker the right to apply to move to a place of safety a person suffering from a mental disorder. But neither of these offer effective protection in most cases of elder abuse: Williams (2008).

  79. 79.

    Law Commission (1997).

  80. 80.

    See also Action on Elder Abuse (2008).

  81. 81.

    Dunn and Foster (2010).

  82. 82.

    The Care Standards Act 2000 saw the terms ‘nursing homes’ and ‘residential homes’ replaced by ‘care homes’ for institutions.

  83. 83.

    Biggs (1996a).

  84. 84.

    Glendenning (1993).

  85. 85.

    See also Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000).

  86. 86.

    Payne and Fletcher (2005); Thobaben and Duncan (2003).

  87. 87.

    Brogden (2001).

  88. 88.

    Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000).

  89. 89.

    Terry (1997).

  90. 90.

    Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000), at 6.

  91. 91.

    Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000).

  92. 92.

    Wanlass (2006).

  93. 93.

    Herring (2000).

  94. 94.

    [2006] EWHC 2584 (Fam).

  95. 95.

    For example, Re M (Care Proceedings: Judicial Review) [2003] EWHC 850 (Admin).

  96. 96.

    See Herring (2011b).

  97. 97.

    Pritchard (2000).

  98. 98.

    Crime and Disorder Act 1998, sections 28–32.

  99. 99.

    Metropolitan Police (2000), 21.

  100. 100.

    CPS (2008), para. 11.

  101. 101.

    Para. 3.2.

  102. 102.

    There has been some debate over whether the focus should be on the abuse of vulnerable adults or elder abuse: Slater (2005).

  103. 103.

    See Burton (2008), chapter 1 for a brief summary.

  104. 104.

    Herring (2010) chapter 6 for further discussion.

  105. 105.

    Walsh et al. (1999).

  106. 106.

    For a detailed discussion, from which the following is drawn, see Herring (2011c).

  107. 107.

    Pritchard (2007).

  108. 108.

    National Center on Elder Abuse (2002), at 3.

  109. 109.

    Bennet et al. (1997), at 54.

  110. 110.

    National Center on Elder Abuse (2002) at 3.

  111. 111.

    Brandl and Cook-Daniels (2002); Bergeron (2001). Brandl and Raymond (1997); Bennet et al. (1997).

  112. 112.

    Gainey and Payne (2006).

  113. 113.

    Bergeron (2001).

  114. 114.

    Herring and Choudhry (2006).

  115. 115.

    Whittaker (1996) at 78.

  116. 116.

    See Herring (2008).

  117. 117.

    Department of Health (2002), para. 2.3 suggested all vulnerable people should be covered by an overarching approach. Previously, Department of Health (1993) had focussed specifically on elder abuse. For discussions of the changing approach see Slater (2005).

  118. 118.

    Department of Health (2002), at para. 2.3

  119. 119.

    It might be argued that being the victim of abuse automatically renders a person vulnerable, but there seems no reason why this is necessarily so, if the incident has no likelihood of repetition and has no lasting effects.

  120. 120.

    House of Commons Health Committee (2004), evidence 163.

  121. 121.

    See Burton (2008), chapter 1 for a brief summary.

  122. 122.

    Phillips et al. (2000).

  123. 123.

    Biggs (1996b).

  124. 124.

    Meyer and Post (2006).

  125. 125.

    Campbell Reay and Browne (2001).

  126. 126.

    Kosberg and MacNeil (2005).

  127. 127.

    Herring (2009).

  128. 128.

    Doron et al. (2004).

References

  • Addo M, Grief N (1998) Does Article 3 of the European Convention on human rights enshrine absolute rights? Eur J Int Law 9:510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken L, Griffin G (1996) Gender issues in elder abuse, Chap. 3. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet G, Kingston P, Penhale B (1997) The dimensions of elder abuse. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron L (2001) An elder abuse case study: caregiver stress or domestic violence? You decide. J Gerontol Soc Work 34:47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs S (1996a) Elder abuse and the policing of community care. Generations Rev 6:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs S (1996b) A family concern: elder abuse in British social policy. Crit Soc Pol 16:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer A, Biggs S (1998) Defining elder abuse. J Soc Welfare Fam Law 20:385

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl B, Cook-Daniels L (2002) Domestic abuse in later life. Elder Law J 8:302

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl B, Meuer T (2001) Domestic abuse in later life. Elder Law J 8:298

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl B, Raymond J (1997) Unrecognized elder abuse victims: older abused women. J Case Manag 6:62

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden M (2001) Geonticide: killing the elderly. Jessica Kingsley, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton M (2008) Legal responses to domestic violence. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Reay A, Browne K (2001) Risk factor characteristics in carers who physically abuse or neglect their elderly dependents. Aging Mental Health 5:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry S, Fenwick H (2005) Taking the rights of parents and children seriously: confronting the welfare principle and the Human Rights Act. Oxford J Legal Stud 25:453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry S, Herring J (2006) Righting domestic violence. Int J Law Pol Fam 20:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry S, Herring J (2007) Domestic Violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention. Public Law 752

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry S, Herring J (2010) European human rights and family law. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper C, Selwood A, Livingston G (2008) The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age Ageing 37:151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPS (2008) Crimes against older people – CPS prosecution policy. CPS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CPS (2010) Violence against women crime report 2008–2009. CPS

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1993) No longer afraid. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2000) No secrets. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2002) No secrets. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2005) Safeguarding adults. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J, Manthorpe J, Biggs S, Mowlam A, Tennant R, Tinker A, McCreadie C (2010) Defining elder mistreatment. Ageing and Society 30:403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doron I, Alon S, Offir N (2004) Time for policy: legislative response to elder abuse and neglect in Israel. J Elder Abuse Neglect 16:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn M, Foster C (2010) Autonomy and welfare as Amici Curiae. Med Law Rev 18:86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Action on Elder Abuse (2008) Consultation paper on the potential for adult protection legislation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Action on Elder Abuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald G (2006) The realities of elder abuse. In: Wahidin A, Cain M (eds) Ageing, crime and society. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainey R, Payne B (2006) Caregiver burden, elder abuse and Alzheimer's disease: testing the relationship. J Health Human Services Admin 29:245

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles H, Fox E, Smith E (1993) Patronizing the elderly: intergenerational evaluations. Res Lang Soc Interact 26:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendenning S (1993) The mistreatment and neglect of elderly people in residential centres: research outcomes in the mistreatment of elderly people. In: Declamer P, Glendenning S (eds) The mistreatment of elderly people, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawks R (2006) Grandparent molesting: sexual abuse of elderly nursing home residents and its prevention. Marquette Elder Advisor 8:159

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2000) The suffering children of blameless parents. Law Q Rev 550

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2008) Carers. In: Freeman M (ed) Law and bioethics. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2009) Older people in law and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2010) Family law. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2011) The serious wrong of domestic abuse and the loss of control defence. In: Reed A, Bohlander M (eds) Loss of control and diminished responsibility: domestic, comparative and international perspectives. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2011b) Legal issues surrounding dementia. Elder Law J 1:182

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J (2011) Elder abuse and stressing carers. In: Bridgeman J, Keating H, Lind C (eds) Regulating family responsibilities. Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring J, Choudhry S (2006) Righting domestic violence. Int J Law Pol Fam 20:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring J, Taylor R (2006) Relocating relocation. Child Fam Law Q 18:517

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Health Committee (2004) Elder abuse. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein S, Manthorpe J, Penhale B (2007) Public perceptions of the neglect and mistreatment of older people: findings of a United Kingdom survey. Ageing Soc 27:919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MP (1995) Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam 57:283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosberg J, MacNeil G (2005) The vulnerability to elder abuse for grandparents raising their grandchildren: an emerging global phenomenon. J Elder Abuse Neglect 15:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law Commission (1997) Report on mental incapacity. HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit N (2002) Theorizing the connections among systems of subordination. Univ Missouri Kansas-City Law Rev 71:227, 228

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden Dempsey M (2006) What counts as domestic violence? A conceptual analysis. William Mary J Women Law 12:301

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden Dempsey M (2009a) Prosecuting domestic violence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madden Dempsey M (2009b) Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manthorpe J (2006) Local responses to elder abuse: building effective prevention strategies. In: Wahidin A, Cain M (eds) Ageing, crime and society. Willan

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreadie C (1996) Elder abuse: update on research. Age Concern, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreadie C (2002) A review of research outcomes in elder abuse. J Adult Protect 4:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolitan Police (2000) Identifying and combating hate crime. Metropolitan Police, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer E, Post L (2006) Alone at night: a feminist ecology model of community violence. Feminist Criminol 1:207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowlam A, Tennant R, Dixon J, McCreadie C (2008) UK study of abuse and neglect of older people: qualitative findings. Department of Health

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Elder Abuse (2002) Preventing elder abuse by family caregivers. National Center on Elder Abuse, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor K, Rowe J (2005) Elder abuse. Rev Clin Gerontol 15:47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe M, Hills A, Doyle M, McCreadie C, Scholes S, Constantine R, Tinker A, Manthorpe J, Biggs S, Erens B (2008) UK study of abuse and neglect of older people prevalence survey report. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne B, Fletcher L (2005) Elder abuse in nursing homes: prevention and resolution strategies and barriers. J Crim Justice 33:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L, de Torres E, Briones G (2000) Abuse of female caregivers by care recipients: another form of elder abuse. J Elder Abuse Neglect 12:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson C, Biggs S (1995) Elder abuse in perspective. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J (2000) The needs of older women. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J (2001) Male victims of elder abuse. Jessica Kingsley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J (2007) Working with adult abuse: a training manual. Jessica Kingsley

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn M, Tomita S (1986) Elder abuse and neglect: causes, diagnosis and intervention strategies. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000) Institutional abuse of older adults. RCP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Salari S (2006) Infantilization as elder mistreatment: evidence from five adult day centers. J Elder Abuse Neglect 17:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuyler D, Liang B (2006) Reconceptualizing elder abuse: treating the disease of senior community exclusion. Ann Health 15:275

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater P (2005) Elder abuse, adult protection and social care. J Adult Protect 7:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit (2005) Social exclusion among older people. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka S, Montminy L (2006) Responding to the needs of older women experiencing domestic violence. Violence Against Women 12:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry P (1997) Counseling the elderly and their carers. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thobaben M, Duncan R (2003) Domestic elder abuse by health care providers. Home Health Care Manag Pract 15:168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turell S (2000) A descriptive analysis of same-sex relationship violence for a diverse sample. J Fam Violence 15:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C, Ploeg J, Lohfeld L, Horne J, MacMillan H, Lai D (1999) Violence across the lifespan: interconnections among forms of abuse as described by marginalized Canadian elders and their care-givers. J Interpersonal Violence 19:282

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanlass D (2006) Securing good care for older people. Kings Fund, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker T (1996) Violence, gender and elder abuse. In: Fawcett B, Featherstone B, Hearn J, Toft C (eds) Violence and gender relations: theories and interventions. Sage, London, p 78

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J (2008) State responsibility and the abuse of vulnerable older people: is there a case for a public law to protect vulnerable older people form abuse. In: Bridgeman J, Keating H, Lind C (eds) Responsibility, law and the family. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf R (1997) Elder abuse and neglect: causes and consequences. J Geriatric Psychiatry 31:153

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2002) The Toronto declaration on the prevention of elder abuse. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Herring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herring, J. (2012). Elder Abuse: A Human Rights Agenda for the Future. In: Doron, I., Soden, A. (eds) Beyond Elder Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25972-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics