Skip to main content

Getting Emotional about News Summarization

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7310))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

News is not simply a straight re-telling of events, but rather an interpretation of those events by a reporter, whose feelings and opinions can often become part of the story itself. Research on automatic summarization of news articles has thus far focused on facts rather than emotions, but perhaps emotions can be significant in news stories too. This article describes research done at the University of Ottawa to create an emotion-aware summarization system, which participated in the Text Analysis Conference last year. We have established that increasing the number of emotional words could help ranking sentences to be selected for the summary, but there was no overall improvement in the final system. Although this experiment did not improve news summarization as evaluated by a variety of standard scoring techniques, it was successful at generating summaries with more emotional words while maintaining the overall quality of the summary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2, 159–165 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Mithun, S., Kosseim, L.: Summarizing Blog Entries Versus News Text. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Events in Emerging Text Types. eETTs 2009, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balahur, A., Lloret, E., Boldrini, E., Montoyo, A., Palomar, M., Martínez-Barco, P.: Summarizing Threads in Blogs Using Opinion Polarity. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Events in Emerging Text Types, eETTs 2009, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 23–31. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feng, S., Wang, D., Yu, G., Li, B., Wong, K.-F.: Summarizing and Extracting Online Public Opinion from Blog Search Results. In: Kitagawa, H., Ishikawa, Y., Li, Q., Watanabe, C. (eds.) DASFAA 2010. LNCS, vol. 5981, pp. 476–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R.J.: Evaluating Content Selection in Summarization: The Pyramid Method. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, Human Language Technology Conference / North American Chapter of the ACL Annual Meeting, pp. 145–152 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, C.Y.: ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of summaries. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop: Text Summarization Branches Out, pp. 74–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plutchik, R.: A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion. Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience 1(3), 3–33 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon. To Appear in Computational Intelligence (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Givoni, I.E., Frey, B.J.: A Binary Variable Model for Affinity Propagation. Neural Computation 21, 1589–1600 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy, A., Szpakowicz, S.: Evaluation of a Sentence Ranker for Text Summarization Based on Roget’s Thesaurus. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2010. LNCS, vol. 6231, pp. 101–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Copeck, T., Kennedy, A., Scaiano, M., Inkpen, D., Szpakowicz, S.: Summarizing with Roget’s and with FrameNet. In: Second Text Analysis Conference, TAC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, A., Copeck, T., Inkpen, D., Szpakowicz, S.: Entropy-Based Sentence Selection with Roget’s Thesaurus. In: Third Text Analysis Conference, TAC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy, A., Szpakowicz, S.: Evaluating Roget’s Thesauri. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2008, pp. 416–424. The Association for Computer Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarmasz, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Roget’s Thesaurus and Semantic Similarity. In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing III. Selected Papers from RANLP 2003. CILT, vol. 260, pp. 111–120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kennedy, A., Kazantseva, A., Inkpen, D., Szpakowicz, S. (2012). Getting Emotional about News Summarization. In: Kosseim, L., Inkpen, D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30352-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30353-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics