Abstract
The previous chapter introduced the range of issues associated with the peri-urban, the subject of this book. The peri-urban as a specific morphological type was defined and the different dimensions of its dynamics were explored. This peri-urban zone is intimately associated with the transition from a dense urban structure to that of a rural character and since it also involves movements into, out of and across it from both these extremes, it is difficult to consider it properly without understanding the broader regional context and dynamics across the urban–rural gradient. Therefore, this chapter will focus on the broader context of urban–rural relationships. Based on recent scientific debates concerning the concept of functional regions and urban–rural relationships, both current and previous definitions and their political implementations are introduced before presenting a new typology to represent Rural–urban Regions (RUR) spatially. Covering the territory of European Union (EU), this typology classifies regions into different types, considering city size, degree of regional mono- and poly-centricity, as well as their urban, peri-urban or rural predominance. The development of the typology includes a further delineation of regions into urban, peri-urban and rural sub-regions, all based on land use patterns and population distribution and density. The typology was subsequently used throughout the PLUREL project and each of the case studies presented in Part Two refers to one of these types, although not all are represented there, since the case studies were unavoidably selected before the typology was developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
NUTS is an acronym for “Nomenclature d’Unités Territoriales Statistiques” (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics). EU countries are subdivided into smaller administrative units on three scales. E.g. Belgium: NUTS1 = Regions, NUTS2 = Provinces, NUTS3 = Arrondissements.
- 2.
LAU – Local Administrative Unit.
- 3.
Here the NUTS3 region-size influence is obvious—even when aggregated to RUR: large regions tend towards polycentric classification, small regions tend towards mono-centric classification. Widening core city buffers to define larger RUR would result in fewer—mainly polycentric—RURs which, however, would mask the smaller cities’ influence spheres.
References
Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urb Ecosys 7(3):241–265
Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Anderson AE (2000) Gateway regions of the world—an introduction. In: Andersson AE, Andersson DE (eds) Gateways to the global economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3–16
Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67:9–26
BBR (2000) Urban development and urban policy in germany. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn
BBR (2005) Raumordnungsbericht 2005. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn
Bengs C, Schmidt-Thomé K (2006) ESPON Report 112: urban–rural relations in Europe. ESPON, Luxembourg. www.espon.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
Bontje M, Burdack J (2005) Edge cities, European-style: examples from Paris and the Randstad. Cities 22(4):317–330
Briquel V, Collicard J-J (2005) Diversity in the rural hinterlands of European cities. In: Hoggart K (ed) The city’s hinterland: dynamism and divergence in Europe’s peri-urban territories. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 19–39
Buciega A, Pitarch MD, Esparcia J (2009) The context of rural–urban relationships in Finland, France, Hungary, The Netherlands and Spain. J Environ Pol Plan 11(1):9–27
Cavailhes J, Peeters D, Sekeris E, Thisse JF (2004) The periurban city: why to live between the suburbs and the countryside. Reg Sci Urban Econ 34(6):681–703
Christaller W (1933) Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischer Funktion. Gustav Fischer, Jena
Couch C, Leontidou L, Petschel-Held G (2007) Urban sprawl in Europe: landscapes, land-use change & policy. Blackwell, Oxford
Dijkstra L, Poelman H (2008) Remote rural regions: how proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions. In: COM—Commission of the European Communities (ed) Regional policy 1/2008. European Commission, Brussels, pp 1–7
ESPON (2005a) ESPON 1.1.3: enlargement of the European Union and the wider European perspective as regards its polycentric spatial structure. ESPON, Luxembourg, www.espon.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
ESPON (2005b) ESPON 1.1.1: potentials for polycentric development in Europe. ESPON, Luxembourg. www.espon.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
COM—Commission of the European Communities (1999) European spatial development perspective. Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
COM (2004) Urban Audit - Methodological Handbook. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg
EUROSTAT (2010) Regional yearbook 2010. Chapter 15: a revised urban–rural typology. EUROSTAT, Luxemburg, pp 240–253
Friedman TL (2006) The world is flat. Penguin, London
Gallego FJ (2010) A population density grid of the European Union. Pop Environ 31:460–473
Gallent N, Anderson J, Bianconi M (2006) Planning on the edge: the context for planning at the rural–urban fringe. Routledge, London
Hall P (1966) Von Thunen’s Isolated State: an English edition of Der Isolierte Staat. (transl: by Carla MW). Pergamon, Oxford
Hall P (1998) Cities in civilisation. Phoenix, London
Hall P, Hay D (1980) Growth centres in the European urban system. Heinemann Educational Publishers, London
Ingo Zasada, Regine Berges, Annette Piorr, Armin Werner: Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
Jensen-Butler C (1997) Competition between cities, urban performance and the role of urban policy: a theoretical framework. In: Jensen-Butler C, Shachar A, van Weesp J (eds) European cities in competition. Avebury, Aldershot, pp 3–42
Kalantaridis C (2010) In-migration, entrepreneurship and rural–urban-interdependencies: the case of East Cleveland, North East England. J Rural Stud 26(4):418–427
Leinfelder H (2009) Formalisation of ‘open space’ as ‘public space’ in zoning: the Belgian experience. In: Van der Valk A, van Dijk T (eds) Regional planning for open space. Routledge, London, pp 225–247
Le Jeannic T (1997) Trente ans de périurbanisation: extension et dilution des villes. Econ Stat 307:21–41
Marvin S, Harding A, Robson B (2006) A framework for city-regions. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), London
Meeus SJ, Gulinck H (2008) Semi-urban areas in landscape research: a review. Living Rev Landsc Res 2:3
METREX (2010) Intra-metropolitan polycentricity in practice: reflections, challenges and conclusions from 12 European metropolitan areas. METREX, Glasgow
Moriconi-Ebrard F (1994) Geopolis, pour comparer les villes du monde. Anthropos, Paris
Nordregio (2000) Study programme on European spatial planning. Final report. Stockholm, Nordregio
OECD (2002) Redefining territories: the functional regions. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD), Paris
OECD (2007) OECD regional typology. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD), Paris
Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) (2011) Peri-urbanisation in Europe: towards a European policy to sustain urban–rural futures. Synthesis report. Academic Books, Frederiksberg
Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York
Sieverts T (2003) Cities without cities: between place and world, space and time, town and country. Routledge, London
Wolfgang Loibl, Klaus Steinnocher, Mario Köstl: AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Donau-City-Straße 1, 1220 Vienna, Austria
Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban areas: a review of societal demands and agricultural provision of goods and services. Land Use Policy 28(4):639–648
Zasada I, Berges R, Hilgendorf J, Piorr A (in press) Horse-keeping and the peri-urban development in the Berlin Metropolitan Region. J Land Use Sci. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2011.628706
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Stefanie Lange and Petri Kahila from Nordregio, Stockholm for their kind reviewing work helping to improve this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zasada, I. et al. (2013). Rural–Urban Regions: A Spatial Approach to Define Urban–Rural Relationships in Europe. In: Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., Sick Nielsen, T. (eds) Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30528-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30529-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)