Skip to main content

Modeling and Enacting Complex Data Dependencies in Business Processes

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8094))

Abstract

Enacting business processes in process engines requires the coverage of control flow, resource assignments, and process data. While the first two aspects are well supported in current process engines, data dependencies need to be added and maintained manually by a process engineer. Thus, this task is error-prone and time-consuming. In this paper, we address the problem of modeling processes with complex data dependencies, e.g., m:n relationships, and their automatic enactment from process models. First, we extend BPMN data objects with few annotations to allow data dependency handling as well as data instance differentiation. Second, we introduce a pattern-based approach to derive SQL queries from process models utilizing the above mentioned extensions. Therewith, we allow automatic enactment of data-aware BPMN process models. We implemented our approach for the Activiti process engine to show applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case Handling: A New Paradigm for Business Process Support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C., Wainer, J.: Proclets: A Framework for Lightweight Interacting Workflow Processes. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 10(4), 443–481 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Activiti: Activiti BPM Platform, https://www.activiti.org/

  5. Bonitasoft: Bonita Process Engine, https://www.bonitasoft.com/

  6. Cohn, D., Hull, R.: Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 32(3), 3–9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dori, D.: Object-Process Methodology. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eshuis, R., Van Gorp, P.: Synthesizing Object Life Cycles from Business Process Models. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2012 Main Conference 2012. LNCS, vol. 7532, pp. 307–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: Towards a Framework for Object-aware Process Management. J. Softw. Maint. Evol.R 23(4), 205–244 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Küster, J., Ryndina, K., Gall, H.: Generation of Business Process Models for Object Life Cycle Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lanz, A., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Robust and flexible error handling in the aristaflow bpm suite. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 174–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, R., Wu, F.Y., Kumaran, S.: Transforming activity-centric business process models into information-centric models for soa solutions. J. Database Manag. 21(4), 14–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Modeling and Enacting Complex Data Dependencies in Business Processes. Tech. Rep. 74, HPI at the University of Potsdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Nigam, A., Caswell, N.: Business artifacts: An Approach to Operational Specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. OMG: Unified Modeling Language (UML), Version 2.4.1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Redding, G., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Iordachescu, A.: A flexible, object-centric approach for business process modelling. In: SOCA 2010, vol. 4(3), pp. 191–201 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., Dadam, P.: Flexibility in process-aware information systems. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (eds.) ToPNoC II. LNCS, vol. 5460, pp. 115–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silberschatz, A., Korth, H.F., Sudarshan, S.: Database System Concepts, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vanderfeesten, I.T.P., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Product-based workflow support. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 517–535 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J., Kumar, A.: A Framework for Document-Driven Workflow Systems. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 285–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Z., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Ouyang, C., Wynn, M., Wang, J., Zhu, X.: How to Guarantee Compliance between Workflows and Product Lifecycles? Tech. rep., BPM Center Report BPM-11-10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M. (2013). Modeling and Enacting Complex Data Dependencies in Business Processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8094. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40175-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40176-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics