Skip to main content

Integrating Temporal Extensions of Answer Set Programming

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8148))

Abstract

In this paper we study the relation between the two main extensions of Answer Set Programming with temporal modal operators: Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) and Temporal Answer Sets (TAS). On the one hand, TEL is a complete non-monotonic logic that results from the combination of Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) with Equilibrium Logic. On the other hand, TAS is based on a richer modal approach, Dynamic LTL (DLTL), whereas its non-monotonic part relies on a reduct-based definition for a particular limited syntax. To integrate both approaches, we propose a Dynamic Linear-time extension of Equilibrium Logic (DTEL) that allows accommodating both TEL and TAS as particular cases. With respect to TEL, DTEL incorporates more expressiveness thanks to the addition of dynamic logic operators, whereas with respect to TAS, DTEL provides a complete non-monotonic semantics applicable to arbitrary theories. In the paper, we identify cases in which both formalisms coincide and explain how this relation can be exploited for adapting existing TEL and TAS computation methods to the general case of DTEL.

The authors would like to thank Pedro Cabalar and Martín Diéguez for their suggestions and comments about the contents of this paper. This research was partially supported by Spanish MEC project TIN2009-14562-C05-04.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brewka, G., Eiter, T., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set programming at a glance. Communications of the ACM 54, 92–103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. del Cerro, L.F.: MOLOG: A system that extends Prolog with modal logic. New Generation Computing 4, 35–50 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabbay, D.: Modal and temporal logic programming. In: Galton, A. (ed.) Temporal Logics and their Applications, pp. 197–237. Academic Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abadi, M., Manna, Z.: Temporal logic programming. Journal of Symbolic Computation 8, 277–295 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Baudinet, M.: A simple proof of the completeness of temporal logic programming. In: del Cerro, L.F., Penttonen, M. (eds.) Intensional Logics for Programming, pp. 51–83. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baldoni, M., Giordano, L., Martelli, A.: A framework for a modal logic programming. In: Porc. of the Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, pp. 52–66 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabalar, P.: Temporal answer sets. In: Proc. of the 1999 Joint Conference on Declarative Programming, APPIA-GULP-PRODE 1999, pp. 351–366 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R.A., Bowen, K.A. (eds.) Logic Programming: Proc. of the Fifth International Conference and Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cabalar, P., Pérez Vega, G.: Temporal equilibrium logic: A first approach. In: Moreno Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2007. LNCS, vol. 4739, pp. 241–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Aguado, F., Cabalar, P., Diéguez, M., Pérez, G., Vidal, C.: Temporal equilibrium logic: a survey. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (to appear, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giordano, L., Martelli, A., Dupré, D.T.: Reasoning about actions with temporal answer sets. TPLP 13, 201–225 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano, L., Martelli, A., Dupré, D.T.: Verification of action theories in ASP: A complete bounded model checking approach. In: Lisi, F.A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 9th Italian Convention on Computational Logic, CILC 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 857, pp. 176–190. CEUR-WS.org (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearce, D.: A new logical characterisation of stable models and answer sets. In: Dix, J., Przymusinski, T.C., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds.) NMELP 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1216, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamp, J.A.: Tense Logic and the Theory of Linear Order. PhD thesis, University of California at Los Angeles (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Henriksen, J.G., Thiagarajan, P.S.: Dynamic linear time temporal logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96, 187–207 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cabalar, P., Demri, S.: Automata-based computation of temporal equilibrium models. In: Vidal, G. (ed.) LOPSTR 2011. LNCS, vol. 7225, pp. 57–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Heyting, A.: Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, 42–56 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hanks, S., McDermott, D.: Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection. Artificial Intelligence 33, 379–412 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vorob’ev, N.N.: A constructive propositional calculus with strong negation. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSR 85, 465–468 (1952) (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Vorob’ev, N.N.: The problem of deducibility in constructive propositional calculus with strong negation. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSR 85, 689–692 (1952) (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Cabalar, P., Diéguez, M.: STeLP – A tool for temporal answer set programming. In: Delgrande, J.P., Faber, W. (eds.) LPNMR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6645, pp. 370–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Cabalar, P., Diéguez, M.: ABSTEM – an automata-based solver for temporal equilibrium models (unpublished draft, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vardi, M., Wolper, P.: Reasoning about infinite computations. Information and Computation 115, 1–37 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Giordano, L., Martelli, A.: Tableau-based automata construction for dynamic linear time temporal logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 46, 289–315 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aguado, F., Pérez, G., Vidal, C. (2013). Integrating Temporal Extensions of Answer Set Programming. In: Cabalar, P., Son, T.C. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40563-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40564-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics