Abstract
Social business and social entrepreneurship offer an exciting field for empirical and conceptual management research. Yet, while there are many attempts to define either social entrepreneurship or social business, the boundaries and overlaps of both phenomena often remain vague or contested – thus rendering empirical or conceptual learning more difficult. We propose a three-dimensional definitional framework to define social business and social entrepreneurship, distinguish them, and relate them to each other. Our framework interprets the pure forms of both social business and social entrepreneurship as the two-dimensional combination of a pure social mission with either pure financial self-sustainability (social business) or a pure innovation focus (social entrepreneurship). Since the finance and innovation perspective are distinct yet independent dimensions, we derive and illustrate four cases of how social business and social entrepreneurship may but need not overlap. Challenging the assumption that each dimension is confined to two dichotomous values, we then interpret each dimension as a full spectrum and introduce the idea of mission, finance, and innovation hybridity. Our discussion suggests that multidimensional hybridity is the empirical rule rather than the exception. It is for this reason that the study of the pure forms of social business and social entrepreneurship promises particularly fruitful insights for management research. We conclude with implications for future management research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alsop, R. (2007, January 31). How boss’s deeds buff a firm’s reputation. Wall Street Journal. pp. B1.
Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Lerts, C. W. (2003). Social entrepreneurship and social transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Studies, 40(3), 260–282.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1.22.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
Battilana, B. J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Stanford (summer), 49–55.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bentham, J. (2009). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (Dover Philosophical Classics). Mineola: Dover Publications.
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory (pp. 1–418). Oxford: Robertson.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Dacin, T. A., Dacin, P., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 36–56.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship” (pp. 1–5). Retrieved from http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CD8QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.caseatduke.org%2Fdocuments%2Fdees_sedef.pdf&ei=yXS8UKf1N8jitQaCkYDIDw&usg=AFQjCNFtTKSFhxk71lH-hZ8IbAYEG74KiA
Dees, J. G. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 55–67. Wiley.
Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In D. Williamson (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding (vol. 3, pp. 39–66). Indianapolis: ARNOVA. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Framing+a+theory+of+social+entrepreneurship:+Building+on+two+schools+of+practice+and+thought#0
Defourney, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergence and divergence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. New York: Harper Business.
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349. doi:10.1177/014920630302900304.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business (p. 417). Chichester: Capstone.
Freeman, E. (1984). Stakeholder management. A strategic approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.
GEM. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor report. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.
Hockerts, K. (2006). CafeDirect: Fair trade as social entrepreneurship. In F. Perrini (Ed.), What awaits social entrepreneurial ventures? (pp. 192–209). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hoffman, A. J., Badiane, K. K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit & non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive social change and organizations: Building and theoretical and research foundation (pp. 131–153). New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Kreutzer, K., & Jager, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661. doi:10.1177/0899764010369386.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
Mackey, J. (2006). Winning the battle for freedom and prosperity. Liberty, 20(6), 1–13.
Mair, J. (2006). Introduction to Part II: Exploring the intentions and opportunities behind social entrepreneurship. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 89–95). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.
Martin, B. R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 29–39.
Mill, J. S. (1998). In R. Crisp (Ed.), Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millar, R. (2012). Social enterprise in health organisation and management: Hybridity or homogeneity? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(2), 143–148. doi:10.1108/14777261211230817.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(4), 805–930.
Murphy, P. J., & Coombes, S. M. (2008). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325–336. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). Inside the hybrid organization: An organizational level view of responses to conflicting institutional demands. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
Popper, K. (1944). The poverty of historicism, I. Economica, 11(42), 86–103.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. (2011, January–February). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. pp. 62–77.
Rangan, V. K., & Thulasiraj, R. D. (2007). Making sight affordable (Innovations case narrative: The Aravind Eye Care System). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(4), 35–49. doi:10.1162/itgg.2007.2.4.35.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Salam, A. (2005). Unification of fundamental forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sattar, Z. (2012). Social business: Capitalism with a human face. Social Business, 2(1), 39–47.
Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, democracy. New York/London: Harper Business.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Smith, W. K., Besharow, M. I., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). Paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 463–478.
Stehr, N., Henning, C., & Weiler, B. (2006). The moralization of the markets. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Suchmann, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 571–610.
Tan, W.-L., Williams, J., & Tan, T.-M. (2005). Defining the “social” in “social entrepreneurship”. Altruism and Entrepreneurship, 1, 353–365.
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logic. In R. Greenwood, C. Olivier, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.
Volery, T., & Hackl, V. (2010). The promise of social franchising as a model to achieve social goals. In A. Fayolle & H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship (pp. 155–179). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Weerawardena, A. J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41, 21–35.
Weisbrod, B. (1977). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In B. Weisbrod (Ed.), The voluntary nonprofit sector (pp. 51–76). Lexington: DC Heath.
Wilson, F., & Post, J. E. (2011). Business models for people, planet (& profits): Exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0.
Yujuico, E. (2008). Connecting the dots in social entrepreneurship through the capabilities approach. Socio-Economic Review, 6(3), 493–513. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn003.
Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty. How social business can transform our lives: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building social business. The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.
Ziegler, R. (2010). Innovations in doing and being: Capability innovations at the intersection of Schumpeterian political economy and human development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 255–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beckmann, M., Zeyen, A., Krzeminska, A. (2014). Mission, Finance, and Innovation: The Similarities and Differences Between Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business. In: Grove, A., Berg, G. (eds) Social Business. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45274-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45275-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)