Skip to main content

GAP-Tree Extensions Based on Skeletons

  • Conference paper
Advances in Spatial Data Handling

Abstract

The Generalized Area Partitioning tree (GAP-tree) is a model that supports on-the-fly generalisation of planar partitions of polygon objects. This paper focuses on solving some limitations of the existing GAP-tree and explores two extensions. The first extension enables the handling of a disjoint polygonal cluster (within the partition) and allows aggregation operations to be performed. The skeleton partitioning model, which is based on the constrained Delaunay triangulation for the polygonal cluster, is used to define the bridge areas between aggregated polygons. The second extension involves the improvement of removing insignificant objects by separating them into parts around the adjusted skeleton and assigning these parts to different neighbours. The adjusted skeleton is defined by the compatibility between the removed object and its neighbours, which considers not only topological relationships but also importance and semantic similarity. This process again uses the Delaunay triangulation. The algorithm is given to construct the extended GAP-tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ai T, Guo R, Liu Y (2000) A Binary Tree Representation of Bend Hierarchical Structure Based on Gestalt Principles. In: Forer P, Yeh AGO, He J (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Beijing, pp 2a30–2a43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ai T, Guo R (2000) A Constrained Delaunay Partitioning of Areal Objects to Support Map Generalization. Journal of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping 25(1):35–41 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader M, Weibel R (1997) Detecting and Resolving Size and Proximity Conflicts in the Generalization of Polygonal Maps. In: Ottoson L (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Cartographic Conference. Stockholm, pp 1525–1532

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez D, Clementini E (1995) Qualitative Distance. In: Proceedings of COSIT’95, Semmering, Austria, pp 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CB, Bundy GL, Ware JM (1995) Map Generalization with a Triangulated Data Structure. Cartography and Geographic Information System 22(4): 317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterom P Van (1995) The GAP-tree, An Approach to On-the-Fly Map Generalization of An Area Partitioning. In: Muller J C, Lagrange J P, Weibel R (eds) GIS and Generalization: Methodology and Practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 120–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterom P Van (1994) Reactive Data Structure for Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterom P Van (1991) The Reactive-Tree: A Storage Structure for a Seamless, Scaleless Geographic Database. In: Auto-Carto 10, pp 393–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorten P, Jones C B (1999) Customisable Line Generalization Using Delaunay Triangulation, CD-Rom Proceedings of the 19th ICC, Ottawa, Section 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Preparata FP, Shamos MI (1985) Computational Geometry An Introduction. Springers-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Putten J Van, Oosterom P Van (1998) New Results with Generalized Area Partitionings. In: Proceedings of Spatial Data Handling, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JM, Jones CB (1995) A Triangulated Spatial Model for Cartographic Generalization of Areal Objects. In: Proceedings COSIT’95. Semmering, Austria, pp 173–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JM, Jones CB (1997) A Spatial Model for Detecting (and Resolving) Conflict Caused by Scale Reduction. In: Kraak MJ, and Molenaar M (eds) In: Advance in GIS Research II (7th Int. Symposium on Spatial Data handling), Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ai, T., van Oosterom, P. (2002). GAP-Tree Extensions Based on Skeletons. In: Richardson, D.E., van Oosterom, P. (eds) Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56094-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56094-1_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62859-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56094-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics