Skip to main content

Innovation Networks and Regional Policy in Europe

  • Conference paper
Innovation Networks

Part of the book series: Technology, Innovation and Policy ((3217,volume 12))

Abstract

One of the priorities for the new generation of regional development programmes in the European Union for the period 2000–2006 is the promotion of innovation. This is clearly stated in the official Commission Guidelines adopted in June 1999 as the basis for the negotiation of the new generation of regional programmes which should channel to the European regions, less favoured in particular,1 most of the 213 billion € of the Structural Funds for this period. These Guidelines2 entitled “Economic and social cohesion: growth and competitiveness for employment” are based on two broad principles: i)—identification of integrated strategies for development and conversion and ii)—the creation of a decentralised, effective and broad partnership. They state that "Structural assistance should therefore give an increasing priority to promoting RTD and innovation capacities in an integrated manner in all fields of intervention of the Funds" though actions such as: i) Promoting innovation: new forms of financing (e.g. venture capital) to encourage startups, spin-outs/spin-offs, specialised business services, technology transfer, ii) interactions between firms and higher education/research institutes, iii) encourage small firms to carry out RTD for the first-time, iv) networking and industrial co-operation, NO developing human capabilities.

The opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ alone and not necessarily those of the European Commission.

Over two thirds of this amount is earmarked for regions whose income per capita is less than 75 % of the European average. Nearly 20 % of people in the Eu still live in regions with ouput per head 25 % or more below the EU average. By comparison, just 2 % of the people in the U.S. are im a similar position, and average disparities between States are less than half those between equivalent regions in the EU (CEC 1998b).

CEC (199); CEC (1998a: 12)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, B.T. (1998): Learning regions as development coalitions: partnership as governance in European workfare states? Paper presented at the second European Urban and Regional Studies Conference on “Culture, place and space in contemporary Europe”, University of Durham, UK, 17–20th September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (1998): Evaluation of R&TD in Regional Systems of InnovationEuropean Planning Studies6, pp. 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini, N. (1998):Services to Industry in the Framework of Regional and local Industrial Policy.Draft paper OECD Modena Conference (May 28–29 1998) on “Up-grading knowledge and diffusing technology to small firms: building competitive regional environments”.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1998a):Seventh Survey on State Aid in the manufacturing and certain other sectors.SEC (99) 148. Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1998b):Sixth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation and Development of the Regions of the European Union.Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1999):The Structural Funds and their Co-ordination with the cohesion fund: guidance for programmes in the period 2000–2006 tabled by Mrs. WulfMathies in agreement with Mr. Flynn Mr. Fischler and Ms BoninoBrussels. (http://www.inforegio.cec.eu.int/wbdoc/docoffic/coordfon/coord_en.htm)

  • Chabbal, R. (1994):OECD Programme on Technology and Economy.OECD Pa-per. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1998): The role of Innovation in Regional Competitiveness, COBBENHAGEN, J. (Ed.)Cohesion Competitiveness and RTDI: their impact on regions. Conference Proceedings, Maastricht, The Netherlands, May 28 and 29, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., MORGAN, K. (1998):The Associational Economy: Firms Regions and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ECOTEC (1999):The On-going evaluation of Regional Innovation Strategies Pilot Projects.Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundacion COTEC (1997):Tecnología e Innovación en España; Report 1997.Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, R.W. (1996): The German apprenticeship system: lessons for Austin, TexasAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science544, pp. 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D., Morgan, K. (1999): Regions as laboratories: the rise of regional experimentalism in Europe, Wolfe, D., Gertler, M. (Eds.)Innovation and Social Learning.Macmillan, St. Martins Press, North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgings, T., ET AL. (1999):R&TDI Thematic Evaluation of the Structural Funds 1994–1999 — Spain country report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, K. (1998): Firm innovation and region: the role of space in innovation processesInternational Journal of Innovation Management2, pp. 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, S. ET AL. (1999):Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation SystemsFinal report of the Advanced Science & Technology Policy Planning Network, Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanbabaso, M. (1997): The promotion of Innovation in regional policy: proposals for a regional innovation strategyEntrepreneurship & Regional Development9, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landabaso, M. (2000): EU Policy on innovation and regional development, Boekema, F., Morgan, K., Bakkers, S., Rutten, R. (Eds.)Knowledge inno- vation and economic growth: the theory and practice of learning regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.) (1992):National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A., Borras, S. (1997):The globalising learning economy: implications for technology policy.Final Report under the TSER Programme. Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A., Ivarne, E. (1998):Competitiveness Localised Learning and Regional Development. Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. London: Routledge (=Routledge frontiers of political economy 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1997): The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewalRegional Studies31, pp. 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers, C., Ireid, A. (1995):Innovative Regions.Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Aragón Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Calabria Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Castilla La Mancha Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Dytiki Makedonia Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Galicia Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Niederosterreich Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Norte Final Report, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS North Sweden Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Pais Vasco Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Shannon, Final Report. EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Strathclyde Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Thessaly, Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Weser-Ems Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS West Midlands Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIS Yorkshire and Humberside Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RITTS Canarias Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RITTS Overijssel Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RITTS Umbria Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Castilla y Leon Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Central Makedonia Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Leipzig-Halle-Dessau Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Limburg Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Lorraine Final Report, EU Commission 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTP Northern EU Final Report RIS+ proposal, EU Commission 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel, C.F. (1994): Flexible Specialisation and Re-emergence of Regional Economies, AMIN, A. (Ed.)Post-Fordism. A Reader.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 101–156.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L. Arundel, A. (Eds.) (1993):An integrated approach to European Innovation and Technology Diffusion Policy: A Maastricht Memorandum.Brus-sels: CEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sri Consulting (1997):A new formula for competitiveness: trust.BIT3M Future-script. London: SRI Consulting Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997):The Regional World. Territorial Development in a Global Economy.New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, G. (1999):Local and regional innovation: governance issues in technological economic and social change. Report of the Six Countries Programme conference in Ireland 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1998) The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Landabaso, M., Oughton, C., Morgan, K. (2001). Innovation Networks and Regional Policy in Europe. In: Koschatzky, K., Kulicke, M., Zenker, A. (eds) Innovation Networks. Technology, Innovation and Policy, vol 12. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57610-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57610-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1382-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57610-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics