Abstract
We propose an original way of applying the rough set theory to the analysis of multi-attribute preference systems in the choice (Pa) and ranking (Py) decision problematics. From the viewpoint of rough set theory, this approach implies to consider a pairwise comparison table, i.e. an information table whose objects are pairs of actions instead of single actions, and whose entries are binary relations instead of attribute values. From the viewpoint of multi-attribute decision methodology, this approach allows both representation of decision maker’s (DM’s) preferences in terms of “if …then…” rules and their use for recommendation in Pa and Py problematics, without assessing such preference parameters as importance weights and substitution rates. The rule representation of DM’s preferences is alternative to traditionally decision support models. The rough set approach to (Pα) and (Pβ) is explained in detail and illustrated by a didactic example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fishburn, P. C.: Methods for estimating additive utilities. Management Science 13 (1967) 435–453.
Grzymala-Busse, J. W.: “LERS — a system for learning from examples based on rough sets”. In: R. Slowinski (ed): Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1992, pp. 3–18.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10 (1982) 151–164.
Mousseau, V.: Problèmes liés à l’évaluation de l’importance en aide multicritère à la décision: Réflexions théoriques et expérimentations. Thèse, Université de Paris-Dauphine, Paris 1993.
Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Information & Computer Sciences 11 (1982) 341–356.
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1991.
Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets, Rough Relations and Rough Functions. Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Computer Science, Technical Report, 24, Warsaw 1994.
Pawlak, Z., Slowinski, R.: Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 72 (1994) 443–459.
Roubens, M., Vincke, Ph.: Preference Modelling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1985.
Roy, B.: Classement et choix en présence de point de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle 8 (1968) 57–75.
Roy, B.: Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision. Economica, Paris 1985.
Roy, B.: Decision science or decision aid science. European Journal of Operational Research. Special Issue on Model Validation in Operations Research. 66 (1993) 184–203.
Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris 1993.
Slovic, P.: Choice between equally-valued alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance 1 (1975) 280–287.
Slowinski, R: “Rough set learning of preferential attitude in multi-criteria decision making”. In: J. Komorowski, Z. W., Ras (eds), Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 689, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1993, pp. 642–651.
Slowinski, R, Stefanowski, J.: “RoughDAS and RoughClass software implementations of the rough sets approach”. In: R. Slowinski (ed): Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Application and Advances of the rough Sets Decision Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1992, pp. 445–456.
Slowinski, R., Stefanowski, J.: “Rough classification with valued closeness relation”. In: E. Diday et al. (eds): New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1994, pp. 482–488.
Tsoukias, A., Vincke, Ph.: A survey on non conventional preference modelling. Ricerca Operativa 61 (1992) 5–49.
Tsoukias, A., Vincke, Ph.: A new axiomatic foundation of the partial comparability theory. Theory and Decision 39 (1995) 79–114.
Vincke, Ph.: Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem. Theory and Decision 32 (1992) 221–240.
Yao, Y. Y., Xining L.: “Uncertain Reasoning with Interval-Set Algebra”. In: W. Ziarko (ed): Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1994, pp. 178–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R. (1997). Rough Set Approach to Multi-Attribute Choice and Ranking Problems. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 448. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59132-7_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62097-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59132-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive