Abstract
The verification of patient positioning during radiotherapy relies on the comparison of portal iamges to a reference image which may be a simulator film or a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) from the computerised treatment planning system. While the comparison has been traditionally done by physicians and/or radiation therapists, much research has been undertaken in recent years to determine the differences between simulator and portal images utilising automatic and quantitative systems (1–4). The outcome is a numerical value for the shift and/or rotation of the treatment field as determined in each portal image in relation to the simulator image.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Meertens H, Bijhold J, and Strackee J 1990 A method for the measurement of field placement errors in digital portal images Phys. Med. Biol. 35 299–323
Jones S, and Boyer A 1991 Investigation of an FFT-based correlation technique for verification of treatment set-up. Med. Phys. 18 1116–1125
van Herk M, Bel A, Gilhuijs K, and Vijlbrief R 1993 A comprehensive system for the analysis of portal images. Radiother. Oncol. 29 221–229
Gilhuijs K, and van Herk M 1993 Automatic on-line inspection of patient set-up in radiation therapy using digital portal images. Med. Phys. 20 667–677
Morgan T, Banks D, and Kagan R 1998 Radiation therapy port films: a quality assurance study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 42 223–227
Bel A, van Herk M, Bartelink H, and Lebesque J 1993 A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. Radiother. Oncol. 29 253–260
Denham J, Dally M, Hunter K, et al. 1993 Objective decision making following a portal film: the results of a pilot study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 26 869–876
Shalev S, and Gluhchev G 1994 Decision rules for the correction of field set-up parameters. Med. Phys. 21 952
Kron T, Hamilton C, Wratten C, and Denham J 1999 A two-dimensional decision making model after comparing portal and reference images. Med. Phys. 26 1131
Morrison D 1976 Multivariate statistical methods. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill, p 128–134
See A, Kron T, Johansen J, Hamilton C, Bydder S, Hawkins J, Roff M and Denham J 1999 Decision making models in the analysis of portal films: a clinical pilot study. Australas. Radiol. (in print)
Shalev S 1996 On-line portal imaging: contributions and limitations in clinical practice. Front. Radiat. Ther. Oncol. 29 156–167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kron, T., Hamilton, C., Hood, C., Wratten, C., Denham, J. (2000). Computer assisted decision making after portal imaging. In: Schlegel, W., Bortfeld, T. (eds) The Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_221
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_221
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67176-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59758-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive