Abstract
The goal of this paper is to propose a new approach to activity-travel schedule modeling that provides a unifying framework for past research in different areas. This approach is based on empirical evidence gathered using a Computerized Household Activity SchEduling (CHASE) survey. The survey provided a means to examine the underlying scheduling behavior of household over a one week period as it occurs in reality. Results show that a clear distinction can be made between routine scheduling decisions that are pre-planned before the week commences, and the more short-term, impulsive, opportunistic decisions made as the schedule is executed during the week. This distinction allows one to conceptualize the modeling task as a multi-stage process, wherein routine planning is approached with existing optimization models (assuming that routine activities are the result of a long-term thought and experimentation process) followed by a more sub-optimal rule-based simulation model to replicate the decisions process during the week within the constructs of the optimal routine plan. Such a model is proposed in this paper as a long term development, and would rely on the type of data provided by new data collection techniques such as CHASE. Operationalization of the model as an event-oriented simulation is proposed. Various components of the model are explored in detail, and discussed within context of existing models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Ettema and H. Timmermans, Theories and models of activity patterns. In: Activity-based approaches to travel analysis, eds. D. Ettema and H. Timmermans, 1–36 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1997).
J.L. Bowman and M. Ben-Akiva, Activity-based travel forecasting. In: Summary, Recommendations and Compendium of Papers from the Activity-based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2–5, 1996, 3–36. Sponsored by the Travel Model Improvement Program (1997).
K.W. Axhausen and T. Gärling, Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews 12(4): 323-341 (1992).
R. Kitamura, C. Chen, R. Pendyala and R. Narayanam, Micro-simulations of daily activity-travel patterns for travel demand forecasting. Paper presented at The Eighth Meeting of the International Association of Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, Texas. September 21–25 (1997).
R. Kitamura and M. Kermanshah, Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choice. Transportation Research Record 944: 22–30 (1983).
T. van der Hoorn, Development of an activity model using a one-week activity-diary data base. In Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, ed. S. Carpenter, and P. Jones, 335–349 (Gower, Aldershot, 1983).
P.M. Jones, M.C. Dix, M.I. Clarke and I.G. Heggie, Understanding travel behaviour (Gower, Aldershot, 1983).
W.W. Recker, M.G. McNally and G.S. Root, A model of complex travel behavior: Part I - Theoretical development. Transportation Research 20A(4): 307–318 (1986).
W.W. Recker, M.G. McNally and G.S. Root, A model of complex travel behavior: Part II - An operational model. Transportation Research 20A(4): 319–330 (1986).
S. Kawakami and T. Isobe, Development of a one-day travel-activity scheduling model for workers. In Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis,ed. P. Jones, 184–205 (Avebury, Aldershot, 1990).
J. Bowman and M. Ben-Akiva, Activity-based model system of urban passenger travel demand. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 74th Annual Meeting, January 22–28, Washington, DC (1995).
J. L. Bowman, M. Bradley, Y. Shiftan, T. K. Lawton and M.E. Ben-Akiva, Demonstration of an activity based model system for Portland. Paper presented at The 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, June (1998).
T. Gärling, Behavioural assumptions overlooked in travel choice modelling. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Santiago, Chile, June 13–16 (1994).
J.W. Payne, J.R. Beaman, E. Coupey and E.J. Johnson, A constructive process view of decision making: multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica 80: 107–141 (1992).
B. Hayes-Roth and F. Hayes-Roth, A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science 3: 275–310 (1979).
T. Gärling, M.-P. Kwan and R.G. Golledge,. Computational-process modelling of household activity scheduling. Transportation Research 28B(5): 355–364 (1994).
T. Gärling, M.-P. Kwan and R. G. Golledge, Computational-process modelling of household travel decisions using a geographic information system. Papers in Regional Science 73(2): 99–117 (1994).
D. Ettema, A. Borgers and H Timmermans, Simulation model of activity scheduling behavior. Transportation Research Record 1413: 1–11 (1993).
C.G. Lundberg, On the structuration of multiactivity task-environments. Environment and Planning 20A: 1603–1621 (1988).
T. Gärling, T. Kal¨¦n, J. Romanus and M. Selart, Computer simulation of household activity scheduling. Environment and Planning A 30: 665–679 (1998).
M. Vause, A rule-based model of activity scheduling behavior. In: Activity-based approaches to travel analysis, eds. D. Ettema and H. Timmermans, 73–88 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1997).
D. Ettema, A. Borgers and H. Timmermans, Using interactive computer experiments for identifying activity scheduling heuristics. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Travel Behaviour, Valle Nevado, Satiago, Chile, June 13–16 (1994).
E.I. Pas, State-of-the-art and research opportunities in travel demand: another perspective. Transportation Research A 19: 460–464 (1985).
J. Polak and P. Jones, A tour-based model of journey scheduling under road pricing. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1994).
M. Wegener, Current and future land use models. Paper presented at the Travel Model Improvement Program’s Land Use Models Conference, Dallas, Texas, February 19–22 (1995).
M. Wegener, Applied models of urban land use, transport and environment: State of the art and future developments. To appear in: Network Infrastructure and the Urban Environment: Recent Advance in Land-use/Transportation Modeling (Sprinter Verlag, New York, 1998).
C. Barrett, K. Berkbigler, L. Smith, V. Loose, R. Beckman, J. Davis, D. Roberts and M. Williams, An operational description of TRANSIMS (Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, 1995). Report LA-UR-95–2393.
L. Smith, R. Beckman, K. Baggerly, D. Anson and M. Williams, TRANSIMS: TRansportation ANalysis and SIMulation System: Project summary and status. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mexico, 1995).
R. Beckman, TRANSIMS methods. Presentation at the Activity-Based Travel Forecasting conference, June 2–5, New Orleans, Louisiana (1996).
K.W. Axhausen and P.B. Goodwin, EUROTOPP: Towards a dynamic and activity-based modelling framework. In Advanced Telematics in Road Transport, 1020–1039 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).
E.J. Miller and P.A. Salvini, A microsimulation approach to the integrated modeling of land use, transportation and environmental impacts. Paper presented at: The 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 11–15 (1998).
S.H. Putnam, EMPAL and DRAM Location and Land Use Models: an overview. Paper presented at the Land Use Modeling Conference, Dallas, TX, February 19–21 (1995).
S.T. Doherty and E.J. Miller, Tracing the household activity scheduling process using a one week computer-based survey. Paper presented at The Eighth Meeting of the International Association of Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, Texas. September 2125 (1997).
G.C. Winston, The Tinting of Economic Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1982).
J. Supernak, Temporal utility profiles of activities and travel: Uncertainty and decision making, Transportation Research B, 26B (1): 61–76 (1992).
T. Gärling, M.-P. Kwan and R. G. Golledge, Computational-process modelling of household travel decisions using a geographic information system. Papers in Regional Science 73(2): 99–117 (1994b).
I. Cullen and V. Godson, Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns. Progress in Planning 4(1): 1–96 (1975).
R. Kitamura, Sequential, history-dependent approach to trip-chaining behavior. Transportation Research Record 944: 13–22 (1983).
K.W. Axhausen, A simultaneous simulation of activity chains and traffic flow. In Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis, ed. P. Jones, 206–225 (Avebury, Aldershot, 1990).
K.W. Axhausen, J. Polak, M. Boltze and J. Puzicha, Effectiveness of the parking guidance system in Frankfurt/Main. Traffic Engineering and Control, 35 (5): 304–309 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doherty, S.T., Axhausen, K.W. (1999). The Development of a Unified Modeling Framework for the Household Activity-Travel Scheduling Process. In: Brilon, W., Huber, F., Schreckenberg, M., Wallentowitz, H. (eds) Traffic and Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60236-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60236-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64316-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60236-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive