Zusammenfassung
In den letzten Jahren haben Unternehmen in fast allen Branchen eine Reihe von Initiativen zur Identifizierung neuer digitaler Technologien und zur Nutzung ihrer Vorteile durchgeführt (Technology Foresight). Sowohl die Weiterentwicklung bestehender als auch die Implementierung neuer Technologien führt zu einer digitalen Transformation der gesamten Wertschöpfungskette, die nahezu alle Produkte und Prozesse sowie Organisationsstrukturen und Managementkonzepte betrifft (Kersten et al., 2017). Die möglichen Vorteile der Digitalisierung sind vielfältig und umfassen unter anderem Umsatz- oder Produktivitätssteigerungen, Innovationen in der Wertschöpfung sowie neuartige Formen der Interaktion mit Kunden. Durch die Anwendung von Technologien wie beispielsweise künstlicher Intelligenz, maschinellem Lernen oder der Blockchain-Technologie können ganze Geschäftsmodelle transformiert oder ersetzt werden (Downes und Nunes, 2015).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Auramo, J., Aminoff, A. und Punakivi, M., 2002. Research agenda for e-business logistics based on professional opinions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(7), 513–531.
Bjork, S., Offer, A. und Söderberg, G., 2014. Time series citation data: The Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics, 98(1), 185–196.
Bourlakis, M. und Bourlakis, C., 2006. Integrating logistics and information technology strategies for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(4), 389–402.
Boyack, K.W. und Klavans, R., 2010. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404.
Briner, R.B. und Denyer, D., 2012. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool, Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms and research, 112–129.
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W.A. und Bauin, S., 1983. From translations to problematicnetworks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191– 235.
Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E. und Herrera, F., 2011. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
Downes, L. und Nunes, P., 2015. Big-Bang Disruption. Harvard Business Review, 91(3), 44–56.
Egghe, L. und Rousseau, R., 1990. Introduction to Informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science, Elsevier Science Publishers.
Fera, M., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., Macchiaroli, R. und Miranda, S., 2017. The role of uncertainty in supply chains under dynamic modeling. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 8(1), 119–140.
Freeman, L.C., 1977. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35.
Fruchterman, M.J. und Reingold, E.M., 1991. Graph Drawing by Force-directed Placement. Software: Practice and experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.
Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S.F., Childe, S.J., Hazen, B. und Akter, S., 2017. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 308–317.
Harris, I., Wang, Y. und Wang, H., 2015. ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: Unleashing potential for the future. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 88–103.
Hazen, B.T., Boone, C.A., Ezell, J.D. und Jones-Farmer, L.A., 2014. Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 72–80.
Hofmann, E. und Osterwalder, F., 2017. Third-Party Logistics Providers in the Digital Age: Towards a New Competitive Arena?. Logistics, 1(2), 9.
Kache, F. und Seuring, S., 2017. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 10–36.
Kersten, W., Schröder, M. und Indorf, M., 2017. Potenziale der Digitalisierung für das Supply Chain Risikomanagement: Eine empirische Analyse, in: Seiter, M., Grünert, L. und Berlin, S. (Hrsg.), Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte von Industrie 4.0, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 47–74.
Kessler, M.M., 1963. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10–25.
King, J., 1987. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13(5), 261–276.
Le, Q. V. und Mikolov, T., 2014. Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents. International Conference on Machine Learning, 1188–1196.
Leydesdorff, L., 2008. On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosineversus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.
Lichtenthaler, E., 2004. Technological change and the technology intelligence process: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 21(4), 331–348.
van der Maaten, L. und Hinton, G., 2008. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579–2605.
Marshakova, I., 1973. System of document connections based on references. Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2 - Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy, (6), 3–8.
De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G. und Provetti, A., 2011. Generalized Louvain method for community detection in large networks. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, IEEE, 88–93.
Merigó, J.M. und Yang, J.B., 2017. Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71–100.
Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T. und Childe, S.J., 2018. Big Data and supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 270(1– 2), 313–336.
Müller, J.M., Buliga, O. und Voigt, K.I., 2018. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 2–17.
Porter, A.L. und Cunningham, S.W., 2004. Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage, 1. Aufl., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Pritchard, A., 1996. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Reaidy, P.J., Gunasekaran, A. und Spalanzani, A., 2015. Bottom-up approach based on Internet of Things for order fulfillment in a collaborative warehousing environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 29–40.
Rip, A. und Courtial, J.P., 1984. Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381–400.
Sandison, A., 1989. Documentation Note: Thinking about citation analysis. Journal of Documentation, 45(1), 59–64.
Scott, J., 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2. Aufl., Sage Publications.
Slavin, R.E., 1986. Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5–11.
Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Smith, L.C., 1981. Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.
De Solla Price, D., 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G.L. und Rangaswamy, A., 2002. Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47– 60.
Su, H.N. und Lee, P.C., 2010. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79.
Wu, D., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Terpenny, J., Gao, R.X., Kurfess, T. und Guzzo, J.A., 2017. A fog computing-based framework for process monitoring and prognosis in cybermanufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43, 25–34.
Xu, L. Da, Xu, E.L. und Li, L., 2018. Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–22.
Ziman, J., 1968. Public Knowledge : An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science, CUP Archive.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwarz, J., Ihl, C. (2019). Einfluss digitaler (Startup-)Technologien im Operations Management. In: Schröder, M., Wegner, K. (eds) Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25411-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25412-4
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)