Abstract
Despite profound differences, both the German Historical School and the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School share a common theoretical and cultural heritage in Central European traditions of social thought and philosophy. Although both schools often are perceived as quintessentially German traditions of economic and social research, their methodological presuppositions and critical intent diverge strongly. Since the objective of the Frankfurt School was to carry the theoretical critique initiated by Marx into the twentieth century, and since its members did so on a highly abstract level of theoretical criticism, the suggestion may be surprising that in terms of their respective research agendas, there was a common denominator between the German Historical School and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. To be sure, as will become apparent, the common ground was rather tenuous and indirect. We must ask, then: in what respects did their theoretical and analytical foundations and orientations overlap? How did the German Historical School, as a nineteenth-century tradition of economic thinking, influence the development of the Frankfurt School?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agger, B.: Western Marxism: An Introduction. Classical and Contemporary Sources, Santa Monica, Calif. ( Goodyear ) 1979.
Anderson, P.: Considerations of Western Marxism, London (NLB) 1976.
Baran, P. A., SWEEZY, P.:Monopoly Capitalism. An Essay on the American Economic and Social OrderNew York (Monthly Review Press) 1966.
Benhabib, S.: Critique, Norm, and Utopia, New York (Columbia University Press) 1986.
Cassel, G.: Sozialismus oder Fortschritt, Berlin (R. Hobbing ) 1929.
Dahms, H. F.: “From Creative Action to the Social Rationalisation of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Social Theory”, Sociological Theory, 13 (1995), pp. 113.
Dahms, H. F.: “Theory in Weberian Marxism: Critical Social Theory in Lukâcs and Habermas”, Sociological Theory, 15 (1997), pp. 181–214.
Dahms, H. F.: “Beyond the Carousel of Reification: Critical Social Theory After Lukâcs, Adorno, and Habermas”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 18 (1998), pp. 3–62.
Dahms, H. F. (Ed.):Transformations of Capitalism: Economy Society and State in Modern TimesNew York (New York University Press) 1999.
Dubiel, H.:Wissenschaftsorganisation und politische Erfahrung. Studien zur fruehen kritischen TheorieFrankfurt/M. (Suhrkamp) 1978.
Glaser, E.: Im Umfeld des Austromarxismus. Ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte des österreichischen SozialismusWien (Europaverlag) 1981, p. 214.
Habermas, J.: “The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno”, in: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures [1985], translated by Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge, Mass. (MIT Press) 1987, pp. 106–130.
Halm, G.: Die Konkurrenz. Untersuchungen über die Ordnungsprinzipien und Entwicklungstendenzen der kapitalistischen Verkehrswirtschaft, München (Duncker & Humblot) 1929.
Hilferding, R.:Finance Capital. A study of the latest phase of capitalist development [1910], London (Routledge & Kegan Paul) 1981.
Horkheimer, M.: “The Authoritarian State”, in: A. ARATO, E. GEBHARDT (Eds.): The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, New York (Urizen Books) 1978, pp. 95117.
Horkheimer, M.: “Traditional and Critical Theory” [ 1937 ], in: Critical Theory. Selected Essays, trans. by M. J. O’Connell and others, New York (Continuum) 1986, pp. 188–243.
Horkheimer, M., ADORNO, TH. W.: Dialectic of Enlightenment [1944], translated by John Cummings, New York (Continuum) 1995.
Jacoby, H.: The Bureaucratization of the World, Berkeley (University of Caifornia Press) 1973.
Jay, M.: Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923–1950, Boston (Little, Brown and Co. ) 1973.
Keynes, J. M.: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York ( Harcourt, Brace ) 1936.
Korsch, K.: Marxism and Philosophy [1923], translated by Fred Halliday, London (Verso) 1970.
Luxacs, G.: History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics [ 1923 ], translated by R. Livingstone, Cambridge, Mass. (MIT Press) 1971.
Lowy, M.: “Figures of Weberian Marxism”, Theory and Society, 25 (1996), pp. 431–446.
Marx, K.: Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft) [1857–58], trans. by M. Nicolaus, London (Penguin Books) 1973.
Marx, K.: Capital. A Critique of Political Economy [1867], translated by Ben Fowkes, New York (Vintage Books) 1977.
Neumann, F.: Behemoth. The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, New York (Oxford University Press) 1942.
Pollock, F.: “Sombarts `Widerlegung’ des Marxismus”, Beihefte zum Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 3, ed. by C. Grünberg, Leipzig (Hirschfeld) 1926.
Pollocx, F.: “Zur marxschen Geldtheorie”, Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 13 (1927), pp. 193–209.
Pollock, F, F.: “Die planwirtschaftlichen Versuche in der Sowjetunion 1917–1927”, Schriften des Instituts für Sozialforschung, 2, Leipzig (Hirschfeld) 1929.
Pollook, F.: “Book Review of Gustav Cassel, Sozialismus oder Fortschritt, etc. ”, Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 15 (1930),pp. 464–473.
Pollook, F. (1932a): “Die gegenwärtige Lage des Kapitalismus und die Aussichten einer planwirtschaftlichen Neordnung”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 1 (1932), pp. 8–27.
Pollook, F. (1932b): “Sozialismus und Landwirtschaft”, in: Festschrift für Carl Grünberg zum 70. Geburtstag, Stuttgart (Kohlhammer) 1932.
Pollook, F.: “Bermerkungen zur Wirtschaftskrise”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 2 (1933), pp. 321–54.
Pollock, F. (1941a): “State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations”, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9 (1941), pp. 200–25.
Pollock, F. (1941b): “Is National Socialism a New Order?” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9 (1941), pp. 440–55.
Pollock, F.: “Automation. Materialien zur Beurteilung der ökonomischen und sozialen Folgen” [ 1956 ], Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, 5, Frankfurt/M. ( EVA ) 1964.
Pot_Lock, F.: The Economic and Social Consequences of Automation, transi. by W. O. Henderson and W. H. Chaloner, Oxford (Basil Blackwell ) 1957.
Postone, M.: Time, Labour, and Social Domination. A reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1993.
Postone, M., BRICK, B.: “Critical Pessimism and the Limits of Traditional Marxism”, Theory and Society, 11 (1982), pp. 617–58.
Schumpeter, J. A.: Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig (Duncker & Humblot) 1912.
Schumpeter, J. A.: “Max Weber’s Work” [1920], in: R. SWEDBERG (Ed.): The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Princeton (Princeton University Press) 1991, pp. 220–227.
Schumpeter, J. A.: The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle [ 1926 ], transi. by R. Opie, Cambridge, Mass. (Harvard University Press) 1934.
Schumpeter, J. A.: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York (Harper & Brothers) 1942.
Schumpeter, J. A.: History of Economic Analysis, ed. by E. Boody Schumpeter, New York (Oxford University Press) 1954.
Simmel, G.: The Philosophy of Money [1907], ed. by D. Frisby, transi. by T. Bottomore and D. Frisby, London (Routledge) 1990.
Weber, M.: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New York (Charles Scribner’s Sons) 1930.
Weber, M.: “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in: H. H. GERTH, C. WRIGHT MILLS (Eds.): From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York (Oxford University Press) 1946, pp. 267–301.
Weber, M.: Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology [ 1922 ], translated by E. Fischoff ; edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley (University of California Press) 1978.
Wellmer, A.: Critical Theory of Society [ 1969 ], translated by J. Cumming, New York (Continuum) 1971.
Wiggershaus, R.: The Frankfurt School. Its History, Theories, and Political Significance [ 1986 ], Cambridge, Mass. ( MIT Press ) 1994.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dahms, H.F. (2000). The Early Frankfurt School Critique of Capitalism: Critical Theory Between Pollock’s “State Capitalism” and the Critique of Instrumental Reason. In: Koslowski, P. (eds) The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04084-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04084-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08592-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04084-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive