Abstract
The central result of classical game theory states that every finite normal form game has a Nash equilibrium, provided that players are allowed to use randomized (mixed) strategies. However, in practice, humans are known to be bad at generating random-like sequences, and true random bits may be unavailable. Even if the players have access to enough random bits for a single instance of the game their randomness might be insufficient if the game is played many times.
In this work, we ask whether randomness is necessary for equilibria to exist in finitely repeated games. We show that for a large class of games containing arbitrary two-player zero-sum games, approximate Nash equilibria of the n-stage repeated version of the game exist if and only if both players have \(\varOmega (n)\) random bits. In contrast, we show that there exists a class of games for which no equilibrium exists in pure strategies, yet the n-stage repeated version of the game has an exact Nash equilibrium in which each player uses only a constant number of random bits.
When the players are assumed to be computationally bounded, if cryptographic pseudorandom generators (or, equivalently, one-way functions) exist, then the players can base their strategies on “random-like” sequences derived from only a small number of truly random bits. We show that, in contrast, in repeated two-player zero-sum games, if pseudorandom generators do not exist, then \(\varOmega (n)\) random bits remain necessary for equilibria to exist.
P. Hubáček—Supported by the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 4/11).
M. Naor—Incumbent of the Judith Kleeman Professorial Chair. Research supported in part by grants from the Israel Science Foundation, BSF and Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology and from the I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 4/11).
J. Ullman—Supported by a Junior Fellowship from the Simons Society of Fellows. Part of this work was done while the author was at postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Research on Computation and Society at Harvard University.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We have adopted Colin and Rowena from Aumann and Hart [1].
References
Aumann, R.J., Hart, S.: Long cheap talk. Econometrica 71(6), 1619–1660 (2003)
Blum, M., Micali, S.: How to generate cryptographically strong sequences of pseudo-random bits. SIAM J. Comput. 13(4), 850–864 (1984)
Budinich, M., Fortnow, L.: Repeated matching pennies with limited randomness. In: ACM EC 2011, pp. 111–118 (2011)
Dodis, Y., Halevi, S., Rabin, T.: A cryptographic solution to a game theoretic problem. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 112–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Goldreich, O.: The Foundations of Cryptography. Basic Techniques, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Halpern, J.Y., Pass, R.: Algorithmic rationality: Game theory with costly computation. J. Econ. Theory (2014)
Halprin, R., Naor, M.: Games for extracting randomness. ACM Crossroads 17(2), 44–48 (2010)
Håstad, J., Impagliazzo, R., Levin, L.A., Luby, M.: A pseudorandom generator from any one-way function. SIAM J. Comput. 28(4), 1364–1396 (1999)
Hubáček, P., Naor, M., Ullman, J.: When can limited randomness be used in repeated games? CoRR abs/1507.01191 (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.01191
Impagliazzo, R.: Pseudo-random generators for cryptography and for randomized algorithms. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1992)
Impagliazzo, R., Luby, M.: One-way functions are essential for complexity based cryptography (extended abstract). In: FOCS 1989, pp. 230–235 (1989)
Kalyanaraman, S., Umans, C.: Algorithms for playing games with limited randomness. In: Arge, L., Hoffmann, M., Welzl, E. (eds.) ESA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4698, pp. 323–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Naor, M., Rothblum, G.N.: Learning to impersonate. In: ICML 2006, pp. 649–656 (2006)
Neyman, A., Okada, D.: Repeated games with bounded entropy. Games Econ. Behav. 30(2), 228–247 (2000)
Yao, A.C.: Theory and applications of trapdoor functions (extended abstract). In: FOCS 1982, pp. 80–91 (1982)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hubáček, P., Naor, M., Ullman, J. (2015). When Can Limited Randomness Be Used in Repeated Games?. In: Hoefer, M. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9347. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48433-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48433-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48432-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48433-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)