Skip to main content

False Autoregulation (Pseudoautoregulation) in Patients with Severe Head Injury. Its Importance in CPP Management

  • Conference paper
Brain Edema XI

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 76))

Abstract

False autoregulation has been described as an alteration of autoregulation in which the apparent maintenance of a constant cerebral blood flow (CBF) when increasing cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is due to an increase in brain tissue pressure. The objective of our study was to investigate how often false autoregulation occurred in patients with a severe head injury. In forty-six patients with a moderate or severe head injury autoregulation was studied using arterio-jugular differences of oxygen (AVDO2) to estimate changes in CBF after inducing arterial hypertension with phenylephrine. Changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and AVDO2 were calculated before and after inducing hypertension. Ninety-five episodes of provoked hypertension were studied in 46 patients. In 28 tests (29.5%) a constant or even reduced CBF was detected simultaneously with a median increase in parenchymal ICP of 8.5 mm Hg (false autoregulation). In this group the median of the induced increase in MABP was 20.6 mm Hg with a median increase in CPP of 11.5 mm Hg. From our data we can conclude that false autoregulation is frequently found in patients after a severe head injury. Increasing MABP to obtain a better CPP in these patients is not beneficial because CBF is not modified or may even be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Enevoldsen EM, Jensen FT (1977) “False” autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury. Acta Neurol Scand [Suppl] 64: 514–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Enevoldsen EM, Jensen FT (1978) Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury. J Neurosurg 48: 698–703

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson PC (1964) Review of previous studies and current theories of autoregulation. Circ Res [Suppl] 1:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miller JD, Garibi J, North JB, Teasdale GM (1975) Effects of increased arterial pressure on blood flow in the damaged brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38: 657–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Milnor WR (1990) Regional circulations. In: Milnor WR (ed) Cardiovascular physiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 387–428

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nordström CH, Grände PO (1998) The “Lund Concept” in neurointensive care. In: von Wild KRH, Nordström CH, Hernández-Meyer F (eds) Pathophysiological principles and controversies in neurointensive care. W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, München Bern Wien New York, pp 67–74

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olesen J (1973) Quantitative evaluation of normal and pathologic cerebral blood flow regulation to perfusion pressure. Changes in man. Arch Neurol 28: 143–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Riley RL, Permutt S, Bromberger-Barnea B (1962) Elastic properties of tissues and autoregulation of blood flow. Physiologist 5: 203

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosner MJ (1987) Cerebral perfusion pressure: Link between intracranial pressure and systemic circulation. In: Wood JH (ed) Cerebral blood flow. Physiological and clinical aspects. McGraw-Hill Company, New York, pp 425–448

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosner MJ, Daughton S (1990) Cerebral perfusion pressure management in head injury. J Trauma 30: 933–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahuquillo J, Munar F, Báguena M, Poca MA, Pedraza S, Rodriguez-Baeza A (1998) Evaluation of cerebrovascular CO2-reactivity and autoregulation in patients with post-traumatic diffuse brain swelling (diffuse injury type III). Acta Neurochir [Suppl] (Wien) 71: 233–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahuquillo J, Poca MA, Ausina A, Baguena M, Gracia RM, Rubio E (1996) Arterio-jugular differences of oxygen (AVDO2) for bedside assessment of CO2-reactivity and autoregulation in the acute phase of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138: 435–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomura N, Kato T, Kanno I, Shishido F, Inugami A, Uemura K, Higano S, Fujita H, Mineura K, Kowada M (1993) Increased blood flow in human brain tumor after administration of angio-tensin-II: demonstration by PET. Comput Med Imaging Graph 17: 443–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sahuquillo, J. et al. (2000). False Autoregulation (Pseudoautoregulation) in Patients with Severe Head Injury. Its Importance in CPP Management. In: Mendelow, A.D., et al. Brain Edema XI. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 76. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6346-7_102

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6346-7_102

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7257-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6346-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics