Skip to main content

Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0

  • Chapter
Daten- und Informationsqualität
  • 5449 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Entwicklungen zum Web 2.0 haben das World Wide Web (WWW) grundlegend verändert. Nachdem die meisten Nutzer im WWW zunächst „nur“ nach Informationen suchten stellen Nutzer inzwischen sehr ausgiebig Informationen über sich selbst oder ihnen vertraute Themen in Blogs und Communities bereit. Facebook und Wikipedia sind zwei prominente Webseiten. Ihre Attraktivität entstammt allein den Informationen, welche die Nutzer selber zur Verfügung stellen.

Die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit entstand im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01MQ07014 geförderten Forschungsprogramms THESEUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Agichtein, E./Brille, E./Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 6–11, 2006, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antiqueira, L./Graças, M./Nunesm, V./Oliveira, O. N./Da F. Costa, L.: Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features. In: Physica, A, 373, 2007, S. 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenstock, J. E.: Automatically Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. School of Information, Paper 2008–021, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, M./Le, P./Wased, M./Brown, D.: Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, January 14 - 17, 2001, IUI ’01, ACM, New York, NY, 2001, S. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. D.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (10), 2001, S. 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBay, W. H.: The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa, Calif., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty, D./McNamara, D./Louwerse, M./Cai, Z./Graesser, A.: Automatic Evaluation of Aspects of Document Quality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: The engineering of quality documentation, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J.: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. In: Nature, 43, 2005, S. 900–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, S./Huberman, B.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. In: Journal of Information Science 32 (2), 2006, S. 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C./McNamara, D. S./Louwerse, M. M./Cai, Z.: Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. In: Behavior Research Methods 36 (2), 2004, S. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, G./Maaß, C./Heß, A.: Alternative Searching Services: Seven Theses on the Importance of “Social Bookmarking”. In: The Social Semantic Web 2007: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Social Semantic Web (CSSW), GI Edition, Lecture Notes in Informatics, 2007, S. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammwöhner, R./Fuchs, K.-P./Kattenbeck, M./Sax, C.: Qualität der Wikipedia – Eine vergleichende Studie. Internationales Symposium Informationswissenschaft, ISI 2007, Köln, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachims, T./Granka, L./Pan, B./Hembrooke, H./Radlinkski, F./Gay, G.: Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 25 (2), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. D.: Understanding Implicit Feedback and Document Preference: a Naturalistic User Study. Doctoral Thesis, UMI Order Number: AAI3117613, Rutgers University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J./Oard, D. W./Romanik, K.: Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching. University of Maryland, CLIS, Technical Report 00–01, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M./Richter, A.: Enterprise 2.0 – Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenburg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, Germany, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, J./Miller, B./Maltz, D./Herlocker, J./Gordon, L./Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM 40 (3), 1997, S. 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S./Bollacker, K./Giles, C. L.: Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, Missouri, United States, November 02 - 06, 1999), S. Gauch, Ed. CIKM ’99, ACM, New York, NY, 1999, S. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lih, A: Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, April 16–17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. B./Kantor, P./Strzalkowski, T./Wacholder, N./Tang, R./Bai, B./Rittman, R./Song, P./Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities: Research Articles. In: American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57 (9), 2006, S. 1155–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D.: Implicit ratings and filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Budapest, Hungary 10–12, ERCIM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F.: Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: Heckhausen, J./Heckhausen, H (Hrsg.): Motivation und Handeln, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg, 2006, S. 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, J./Polanco, M. J.: Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web. In: Communications of the ACM, 40 (3) 1997, S. 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, Y./Zhang, B.: Learning user’s preferences by analyzing Web-browsing behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Barcelona, Spain, June 03 - 07, 2000), AGENTS ’00, ACM, New York, NY, 2000; S. 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stvilia B./Twidale, M. B./Smith, L.C./Gasser, L.: Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality - ICIQ 2005, S. 442–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R./Ng, K. B./Strzalkowski, T./Kantor, P. B.: Automatically Predicting Information Quality in News Documents. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology - North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W.: Implicit Feedback for Interactive Information Retrieval. Doctoral Thesis, Glasgow University, 2004. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.84.6781&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediansEditsGt5.htm.

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria.

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Splitting (letzte Änderung vom 19. April 2010, 20:38h).

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_for_nominating_good_articles (letzte Änderung vom 2. November 2009, 03:41h).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism (letzte Änderung vom 17. Mai 2010, 23:35h).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanbe, Y./Jatowt, A./Nakamura, S./Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries, June 18–23, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007, S. 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Vieweg+Teubner Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahlheid, S., Graefe, G., Krebs, A., Schuster, D. (2011). Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0. In: Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., Mielke, M. (eds) Daten- und Informationsqualität. Vieweg+Teubner. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9953-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics