Skip to main content

A Dialogical Perspective of Social Representations of Responsibility

  • Chapter
Meaning in Action

Abstract

Discourse about responsibility has become a fashionable contemporary subject. Much of it, at least in the social sciences and humanities, is related to claims that in traditional democracies we can observe decreasing demands on taking individual and collective responsibilities. Instead, we witness an increase in, and magnified claims for, more and more rights for individuals and specific groups. Charles Taylor’s (1995) analysis of this phenomenon has become classic, but many others have joined in. “Rights mania” has been viewed as a phenomenon of the twentieth century (e.g. Donahue 1990) continuing well to the present one; rights have become licenses of the media to make caricatures of whatever they like. Strong institutions have the power to judge and misrepresent the positions of their opponents. No wonder that balancing rights and responsibilities (Etzioni 1991, O’Neill 2002) has become an essential requirement of a civil society and democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakhtin MM (1979/1986) The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences. In: McGee V (Trans) Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 103–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin MM (1981) The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Holquist M (Ed), Emerson C, Holquist M (Trans). University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brushlinski A (1994). Problems of the psychology of the subject (Problemy psichologii subjekta). Rossijskaja Akademia Nauk, Moskva

    Google Scholar 

  • Charta 77. In: Precăn V (Ed) Charta 77 (1977-1998). Archa, Bratislava, SK, pp 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue WA (1990) The new freedom: individualism and collectivism in the social lives of Americans. Transaction, New Brunswick NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A (1991) The community in an age of individualism: an interview with Amitai Etzioni. Futurist May–June:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko PG (1982) Memoirs. Whitney T (Trans). Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossen M, Salazar-Orvig A (2006) The speaker’s positioning: a manifestation of the dialogicality of the self. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Braga, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel V (1975) A letter to Gustáv Husák (Dopis Gustávu Husákovi). Reprinted in V. Havel (1990). O Lidskou Identitu. Rozmluvy, Praha, pp 19–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel V (1983/1999) Responsibility as a fate (Odpovědnost jako osud). In: Havel V (Ed) Ouevre 4(Spisy 4). Torst, Praha, pp 402–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel V (1985–1986/1999) A distant interrogation (Dálkový výslech). In: Havel V (Ed) Ouevre 4 (Spisy 4). Torst, Praha, pp 699–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell P (1998) Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková I (1990) Ethics as a branch of societal psychology: its particular relevance to the social psychology of medicine. In: Himmelweit H, Gasell G (Eds) Societal psychology. Sage, London, pp 112–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková I (2003) Dialogicality and social representations. The dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková I (2006) On the “inner Alter” in dialogue. Int J Dialog Sci 1:125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková I, Linell P, Grossen M, Salazar-Orvig A (2007) Dialogue in focus groups: exploring socially shared knowledge. Equinox, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MeznÍk J (2005) My life during the communist rule (1948–1989) (Mů j Život za Vlády Komunistů [1948–1989]). Matice moravská, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (1961/1976) La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (1972) Society and theory in social psychology. In: Israel J, Tajfel H (Eds) The context of social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 17–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (1979) Psychologie des minorités actives. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (1984) Introduction: le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In: Moscovici S (Ed) Psychologie sociale. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici S (2003) Age des masses, age des minorités. In: Segatori R, Crisofori C, Samtambrogio A (Eds) Sociologia edsesperienza di vita. Scritti in onore di Franco. Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna, pp 153–170

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (2002) A question of trust. Reith Lectures, BBC 1. Retrieved April and May from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/lecture5.shtml

  • Orfali B (2004) Typologie des focus groups à partir d’un dilemme sur le SIDA: le rôle du ≪compère spontané≫. Bulletin de Psychologie 57:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfali B, Marková I (2002) Analogies in focus groups: from the victim to the murderer and from the murderer to the victim. Eur Rew Appl Psychol 52:263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka J (1977a) About the duty to defend oneself against injustice (O povinnosti bránit se proti bezprávÍ). In: Precăn V (Ed) (1990) Charta 77 (1977–1998). Archa, Bratislava, pp 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka J (1977b) What can we expect from the Charta 77? (Co můžeme očekávat od Charty 77?) In: Precăn V (Ed) (1990) Charta 77 (1977–1998). Archa, Bratislava, pp 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1995) The politics of recognition. In: Taylor C (Ed) Philosophical arguments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaculík L (1983) The Czech dreambook (Çeský Snář). Sixty-Eight Publishers, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimeçka, M. (1984) The restoration of order: the normalization of Czechoslovakia 1969–1976. Verso, Lond

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marková, I. (2008). A Dialogical Perspective of Social Representations of Responsibility. In: Sugiman, T., Gergen, K.J., Wagner, W., Yamada, Y. (eds) Meaning in Action. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics