Abstract
Discourse about responsibility has become a fashionable contemporary subject. Much of it, at least in the social sciences and humanities, is related to claims that in traditional democracies we can observe decreasing demands on taking individual and collective responsibilities. Instead, we witness an increase in, and magnified claims for, more and more rights for individuals and specific groups. Charles Taylor’s (1995) analysis of this phenomenon has become classic, but many others have joined in. “Rights mania” has been viewed as a phenomenon of the twentieth century (e.g. Donahue 1990) continuing well to the present one; rights have become licenses of the media to make caricatures of whatever they like. Strong institutions have the power to judge and misrepresent the positions of their opponents. No wonder that balancing rights and responsibilities (Etzioni 1991, O’Neill 2002) has become an essential requirement of a civil society and democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakhtin MM (1979/1986) The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences. In: McGee V (Trans) Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 103–131
Bakhtin MM (1981) The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Holquist M (Ed), Emerson C, Holquist M (Trans). University of Texas Press, Austin
Brushlinski A (1994). Problems of the psychology of the subject (Problemy psichologii subjekta). Rossijskaja Akademia Nauk, Moskva
Charta 77. In: Precăn V (Ed) Charta 77 (1977-1998). Archa, Bratislava, SK, pp 9–13
Donahue WA (1990) The new freedom: individualism and collectivism in the social lives of Americans. Transaction, New Brunswick NJ
Etzioni A (1991) The community in an age of individualism: an interview with Amitai Etzioni. Futurist May–June:35–39
Grigorenko PG (1982) Memoirs. Whitney T (Trans). Norton, New York
Grossen M, Salazar-Orvig A (2006) The speaker’s positioning: a manifestation of the dialogicality of the self. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Braga, Portugal.
Havel V (1975) A letter to Gustáv Husák (Dopis Gustávu Husákovi). Reprinted in V. Havel (1990). O Lidskou Identitu. Rozmluvy, Praha, pp 19–49
Havel V (1983/1999) Responsibility as a fate (Odpovědnost jako osud). In: Havel V (Ed) Ouevre 4(Spisy 4). Torst, Praha, pp 402–417
Havel V (1985–1986/1999) A distant interrogation (Dálkový výslech). In: Havel V (Ed) Ouevre 4 (Spisy 4). Torst, Praha, pp 699–917
Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York
Linell P (1998) Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Marková I (1990) Ethics as a branch of societal psychology: its particular relevance to the social psychology of medicine. In: Himmelweit H, Gasell G (Eds) Societal psychology. Sage, London, pp 112–137
Marková I (2003) Dialogicality and social representations. The dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Marková I (2006) On the “inner Alter” in dialogue. Int J Dialog Sci 1:125–148
Marková I, Linell P, Grossen M, Salazar-Orvig A (2007) Dialogue in focus groups: exploring socially shared knowledge. Equinox, London
MeznÍk J (2005) My life during the communist rule (1948–1989) (Mů j Život za Vlády Komunistů [1948–1989]). Matice moravská, Brno
Moscovici S (1961/1976) La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Moscovici S (1972) Society and theory in social psychology. In: Israel J, Tajfel H (Eds) The context of social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 17–68
Moscovici S (1979) Psychologie des minorités actives. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Moscovici S (1984) Introduction: le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In: Moscovici S (Ed) Psychologie sociale. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 5–22
Moscovici S (2003) Age des masses, age des minorités. In: Segatori R, Crisofori C, Samtambrogio A (Eds) Sociologia edsesperienza di vita. Scritti in onore di Franco. Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna, pp 153–170
O’Neill O (2002) A question of trust. Reith Lectures, BBC 1. Retrieved April and May from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/lecture5.shtml
Orfali B (2004) Typologie des focus groups à partir d’un dilemme sur le SIDA: le rôle du ≪compère spontané≫. Bulletin de Psychologie 57:273–279
Orfali B, Marková I (2002) Analogies in focus groups: from the victim to the murderer and from the murderer to the victim. Eur Rew Appl Psychol 52:263–271
Patočka J (1977a) About the duty to defend oneself against injustice (O povinnosti bránit se proti bezprávÍ). In: Precăn V (Ed) (1990) Charta 77 (1977–1998). Archa, Bratislava, pp 31–34
Patočka J (1977b) What can we expect from the Charta 77? (Co můžeme očekávat od Charty 77?) In: Precăn V (Ed) (1990) Charta 77 (1977–1998). Archa, Bratislava, pp 38–42
Taylor C (1995) The politics of recognition. In: Taylor C (Ed) Philosophical arguments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–180
Vaculík L (1983) The Czech dreambook (Çeský Snář). Sixty-Eight Publishers, Toronto
Šimeçka, M. (1984) The restoration of order: the normalization of Czechoslovakia 1969–1976. Verso, Lond
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marková, I. (2008). A Dialogical Perspective of Social Representations of Responsibility. In: Sugiman, T., Gergen, K.J., Wagner, W., Yamada, Y. (eds) Meaning in Action. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-74679-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-74680-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)