Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vantaggi e limiti dei magneti ad alto campo (3T)

  • Chapter
Imaging RM della prostata

  • 639 Accesses

Riassunto

Negli ultimi anni si stanno diffondendo sempre più nella ricerca e nella pratica clinica scanner whole-body ad alto campo con magnete a 3T (3 Tesla). L’uso di campi magnetici più potenti consente di ottenere un più alto rapporto segnale-rumore, con significativi vantaggi in termini di risoluzione spaziale, temporale e di contrasto.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. de Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC (2004) MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0T: preliminary results. Radiology 230: 652–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sosna J, Pedrosa I, Dewolf WC et al (2004) MR imaging of the prostate at 3-Tesla: comparison of an external phasedarray coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Acad Radiol 11:857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sosna J, Rofsky NM, Gaston SM et al (2003) Determinations of prostate volume at 3-Tesla using an external phased-array coil: comparison to pathologic specimens. Acad Radiol 10:846–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornfeld DM, Weinreb JC (2007) MR imaging of the prostate: 1,5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15: 433–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Futterer JJ, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ et al (2004) Initial experience of 3T endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol 39: 671–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A, Muellner A, Hricak H (2008) MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practice. MAGMA 21(6):379–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim CK, Park BK (2008) Update of prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. JCAT 32:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlani M, Mancino S, Bonanno E et al (2008) Combined morphological, [1H]-MR spectroscopic and contrast-enhanced imaging of human prostate cancer with a 3-Tesla scanner: preliminary experience. Radiol Med 113:670–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G et al (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G et al (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging and quantitative analysis of prostate cancer at 3 Tesla. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 14:109

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim CK, Park BK, Park W, Kim SS (2008) Prostate MR imaging at 3T using a phased-arrayed coil in predicting locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: preliminary experience. Abdominal Imaging [Jan 7 Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim CK, Park BK, Lee MH (2009) Prediction of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: incremental value of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:391–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim CK, Park BK, Han JJ et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results. JCAT 31(3):449–454

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kajihara H, Hayashida Y, Murakami R et al (2009) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the localization of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 74(2):399–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshizako T, Wada A, Hayashi T et al (2008) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer. Acta Radiol 49:1207–1213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, Kwon GY (2007) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 42:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manenti G, Squillaci E, Di Roma M (2006) In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging. Radiol Med 111(8):1124–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Somford DM, Futterer JJ, Hambrock T, Barentsz JO (2008) Diffusion and perfusion MR imaging of the prostate. Magn Res Imaging Clin N Am 16(4):685–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiebler ML, Tomaszewski JE, Bezzi M et al (1989) Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 172:131–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ackerstaff E, Pflug BR, Nelson JB, Bhujwalla AM (2001) Detection of increased choline compounds with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy subsequent to malignant transformation of human prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res 61:3599–3603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng LL, Wu CL, Smith MR, Gonzalez RG (2001) Nondestructive quantitation of spermine in human prostate tissue samples using HRMAS H-1 NMR spectroscopy at 9.4 T. FEBS Lett 494:112–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van der Graaf M, Schipper RG, Oosterhof GO et al (2000) Proton MR spectroscopy of prostatic tissue focused on the detection of spermine, a possible biomarker of malignant behavior in prostate cancer. MAGMA 10:153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner N. et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels. BJU International. 2009; 103:730–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Squillaci E, Manenti G, Mancino S et al (2005) MR spectroscopy of prostate cancer. Initial clinical experience. J Exp Clin Cancer Research 24(4):523–530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Manenti G, Squillaci E, Carlani M et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with spectroscopic imaging using a surface coil. Initial clinical experience. Radiol Med 111(1):22–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheenen TW, Heijmink SW, Roell SA et al (2006) 3D 1HMR spectroscopic imaging of the vivo human prostate at 3T with a body array coil: a step towards MR screening of prostate cancer? Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 113

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klomp DWJ, Bitz AK, Heerschap A et al (2009) Proton spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 7T. NMR Biomed; published online

    Google Scholar 

  28. Near J, Romagnoli C, Bartha R (2009) Reduced power magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 4.0 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61:273–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C et al (2001) High resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T:technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 46:955–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenman RL, Shirisky JE, Mulkern RV et al (2003) Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:648–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Kurhanewicz J et al (2006) High-resolution 3D MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 3T with the MLEV-PRESS sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 24:825 832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim DH, Margolis D, Xing L et al (2005) In vivo prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using two-dimensional J-resolved PRESS at 3T. Magn Reson Med 53: 1177–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Università degli Studi di Roma «Tor Vergata», Roma, Italia

    Guglielmo Manenti & Gabriele Bazzocchi

Authors
  1. Guglielmo Manenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriele Bazzocchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche “Sapienza”, Università di Roma, Roma, Italia

    Roberto Passariello  & Valeria Panebianco  & 

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze Urologiche “Sapienza”, Università di Roma, Roma, Italia

    Franco Di Silverio  & Alessandro Sciarra  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manenti, G., Bazzocchi, G. (2010). Vantaggi e limiti dei magneti ad alto campo (3T). In: Passariello, R., Panebianco, V., Di Silverio, F., Sciarra, A. (eds) Imaging RM della prostata. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1515-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1516-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation